New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The DOJ has finally gotten serious with Jan 6th traitors.

It was all a stupid parade of idiots and morons. The FBI/DOJ should investigate, charge, arrest, and try all of those who are guilty. The House Committee crap is a red meat factory for the so inclined. Idiot GOPers do this same garbage over and over again as well. It’s production for the cameras.
... who brought bombs, heavy weapons and handguns near and to the capital complex threatening to murder America's congress persons and hang the president of the united states.

There, fixed it for yah
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
As if you are elected to speak for the "smart money"?

It is rioters who are being charged...not political opposition. Seems odd that you don't see the difference. Clearly the planners knew there would be an easily riled up mob...
The majority did not enter the capitol building, but their presence strengthened the impact of those who did.
Seems odd that you missed the efforts to tar everyone from McCarthy to Trump as part of the "insurrection."

That sounds an awfully lot like an attempt at guilt by association to me.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
The leader of the Oathkeepers said he had a bunch of his militia with weapons nearby.

It is not propaganda to say that people didn't show up in military camouflage and carrying weapons (baseball bats, hockey sticks, metal pipes, spears and bear spray are weapons)....to simply protest.

It is not a coincidence that they came on the very day that the count of electors was done and Biden would be officially announced as the president elect.

There was an obvious point to Trump organizing that rally and then spending an hour in a nearly incoherent rant, punctuated by calls to stop the steal (stop the count) and that the failure to fight like hell would mean the end of our country.
"Said?" LOL!

People showed up in "military camouflage?" Hahahaha - wouldn't they show up in suits if they were really trying to "camouflage" themselves in the Capitol Building?

How many people actually had "weapons?" A couple dozen maybe? It certainly is propaganda to suggest everyone was armed.

What was that "obvious point?" To allow a couple dozen "camouflaged" and "armed" (with sticks) people to overthrow the government? You are a complete joke.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
... who brought bombs, heavy weapons and handguns near and to the capital complex threatening to murder America's congress persons and hang the president of the united states.

There, fixed it for yah
All you fixed were posting Lies
Who has been indicted for having "bombs,heavy weapons and handguns inside the capital?
Who threatened to hang Trump?

Democrats can't handle the truth (msn.com)

Yes, Youcan'thandledatruth
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
"Said?" LOL!

People showed up in "military camouflage?" Hahahaha - wouldn't they show up in suits if they were really trying to "camouflage" themselves in the Capitol Building?

How many people actually had "weapons?" A couple dozen maybe? It certainly is propaganda to suggest everyone was armed.

What was that "obvious point?" To allow a couple dozen "camouflaged" and "armed" (with sticks) people to overthrow the government? You are a complete joke.
keep trying to pretend they were no threat...140 cops need medical care...a couple thousand, did you mean? 700 charged with violent acts.

Why were they armed? Why in tactical gear?

It was all about interfering with a constitutional process. How you can argue a more innocent intent is good for a laugh.
 

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
keep trying to pretend they were no threat...140 cops need medical care...a couple thousand, did you mean? 700 charged with violent acts.

Why were they armed? Why in tactical gear?

It was all about interfering with a constitutional process. How you can argue a more innocent intent is good for a laugh.
LOL! "Pretend they were no threat?" What exactly was the threat? What "violent acts?" "Armed?" With hockey sticks and bear spray? With that they were going to overthrow the government? 700 charged with "violent acts?" The vast majority were charged with trespassing. If this was such a "threat" to the government, why do you have to gaslight over what in fact actually happened?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
LOL! "Pretend they were no threat?" What exactly was the threat? What "violent acts?" "Armed?" With hockey sticks and bear spray? With that they were going to overthrow the government? 700 charged with "violent acts?" The vast majority were charged with trespassing. If this was such a "threat" to the government, why do you have to gaslight over what in fact actually happened?
if it wasn't a threat why was congress evacuated? If a threat wasn't the intent then why the violence? Why break windows and doors?
 

EatTheRich

President
Seems odd that you missed the efforts to tar everyone from McCarthy to Trump as part of the "insurrection."

That sounds an awfully lot like an attempt at guilt by association to me.
You mean the evidence that Trump and possibly McCarthy helped plan and foment the insurrection?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
because they're wussies
This isn't high school. Do you really think the 50 and 60 year old members of congress should have engaged in a brawl with Trump's mob?

I think the cops should have shot more of the rioters....they were attacking the cops with weapons...baseball bats or metal pipes could kill.
 
Top