... and they're continuing the "taking" process with the anti democracy laws.Trumpism couldn't get over losing to America.
So they decided to take our ball and go home.
In other words it was allowed to happen for political purposes. As Obama's White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said, " Never let a crisis go to waste."Manufactured:
View attachment 63625
If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.
Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.
It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?
A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.
We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
Revolver news - kook site alert !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and this one posts and believes them !Manufactured:
View attachment 63625
If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.
Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.
It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?
A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.
We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
As I recall, Drudge made its mark by scooping the mainstream media on these kinds of stories they wouldn't touch out of fear of not being invited to the next White House Press Corp dinner. You guys have a lot of nerve trying to continue to run this "fact checking" scam after having it blow up so spectacularly in your faces over the past several years.Revolver news - kook site alert !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and this one posts and believes them !
Probably paid the 4.99 to go ad free !
Is the revolver news site biased or questionable?
Overall, we rate Revolver.News right biased and Questionable based on poor sourcing techniques and a complete lack of transparency. Founded in 2020, Revolver.News is a conservative news aggregation/curation website that claims to be the new Drudge Report.
That's some imagination you have there. Wow... such an unbelievable, fictional, scenario you created.In other words it was allowed to happen for political purposes. As Obama's White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said, " Never let a crisis go to waste."
But when the [D]'s didn't have one they improvised and created one hoping to imprison President Trump and once and for all, after 5 years of trying dispose of him and prevent him from ever holding office again.
Evil is incurable.
WTF ?Manufactured:
View attachment 63625
If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.
Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.
It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?
A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.
We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
They are trying to rewrite history, plain and simple, these type of lies need to be called out every time(anywhere and any place) they are repeated.WTF ?
The HEAD OF THE FEDERAL GOVT organized the entire thing. Are you just going to pretend that this was not Trump's event and that he should not be responsible for it outcome ? He literally told them to go there and even told them that he was going to march there with them.
The lying and the right has become purely pathological and unhinged.
So it's gone from blue lives matter to the cops are the real criminals.They are trying to rewrite history, plain and simple, these type of lies need to be called out every time(anywhere and any place) they are repeated.
___________________________
How the FBI became the target of a conspiracy theory about the Jan. 6 Capitol riot
snip---
On Tuesday night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson told his roughly three million viewers that it appeared “the FBI was organizing the riots of Jan. 6.” Though Carlson provided no evidence for this inflammatory allegation, his claim was quickly picked up and repeated as fact by a number of other conservative pundits and Republican lawmakers.
Over the course of two days, outraged calls for the truth about the FBI’s supposed involvement in the Capitol riots ricocheted across social media, making their way to FBI headquarters and even into the Congressional record.
The FBI false-flag narrative did not originate with Tucker Carlson, however, but with an article published Monday by Revolver News, a right-wing website run by former Trump speechwriter Darren Beattie. Beattie, who was fired from the White House in 2018 for attending a conference alongside white supremacists, was later appointed by Trump on his way out of office to a government commission that preserves Holocaust-related sites in Europe.
It’s unclear whether anyone other than Beattie writes for Revolver, as no bylines appear to be on the site’s original posts, including this week’s “exclusive” suggesting the FBI was behind the Capitol riots.
So true... quite the contrast from an earlier show of support.So it's gone from blue lives matter to the cops are the real criminals.
Trumpism is one helluva drug.
"IF IT TURNS OUT"....So at the moment you have no evidence what so ever, but you would like to have investigations into the issue to see if you can dig something up...Manufactured:
View attachment 63625
If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.
Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.
It is unsettling to entertain the possibility that the federal government knew of a potential for violence on 1/6 and did nothing to stop it. It presents the question: why would agencies, or certain elements within, sit back and let something like this happen on purpose?
A still more disturbing possibility arises from a careful study of the unindicted co-conspirators listed throughout the various charging documents of individuals facing the most serious charges related to 1/6.
We at Revolver News have noticed a pattern from our now months-long investigation into 1/6 — and in particular from our meticulous study of the charging documents related to those indicted. In many cases the unindicted co-conspirators appear to be much more aggressive and egregious participants in the very so-called “conspiracy” serving as the basis for charging those indicted.
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
Yes, you could call going from the middle of the day to the dark of midnight a "contrast", at the very least.So true... quite the contrast from an earlier show of support.
We should be used to their hypocrisy by now... still it needs to be pointed out. Jim Acosta does it well.Yes, you could call going from the middle of the day to the dark of midnight a "contrast", at the very least.
Link please to Trump's comments that fomented "armed insurrection?"WTF ?
The HEAD OF THE FEDERAL GOVT organized the entire thing. Are you just going to pretend that this was not Trump's event and that he should not be responsible for it outcome ? He literally told them to go there and even told them that he was going to march there with them.
The lying and the right has become purely pathological and unhinged.
Link please to Trump's comments that fomented "armed insurrection?"
I said outcome.Link please to Trump's comments that fomented "armed insurrection?"
Thank you. I appreciate that Addy. Wouldn't it be wonderful if more folks were openminded and curious enough to try to explain baffling puzzles?That's some imagination you have there. Wow... such an unbelievable, fictional, scenario you created.