New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

The overturning of Roe v Wade is just the beginning by the far right SC

write on

Senator
You didn't read it.
Here's the quote from God:
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”

To bring you up to speed, this is the Bible claiming a baby is a human being.
For the Bible's view on abortion, you need to look in the Book of Exodus, to the section on the Ten Commandments, where one says "thou shalt not kill."

Your side of the aisle has maintained that a baby is a useless group of cells, (a distinction only determined by the mother) that can be killed even an hour after birth.) The Bible defines a baby as a human being.
The bible contradicts itself time and time again. No wonder all I hear from its thumpers are platitudes.

In the verses below, it calls for an abortion if a wife gets pregnant because of her adultery. But wingers want a woman to have the child, no matter what the circumstances, such as rape.

 
Well, as a matter of fact, pollsters usually sample a lot more Democrats than Republicans, (probably because a lot of polls are taken during the day when Republicans are working at a job and Democrats are home watching soap operas thanks to welfare checks).
Good point - and BTW , that's why Obama got more people at his inauguraton than Trump. Trump's people were AT WORK.

Also, it's because the polls are from universities, liberal think tanks, and the mainstream media, all of which is viewed by conservatives as leftist and biased.
 

write on

Senator
Good point - and BTW , that's why Obama got more people at his inauguraton than Trump. Trump's people were AT WORK.
Have you ever heard of sick days and, more importantly, know the historical significance of Obama's inauguration?

Also, it's because the polls are from universities, liberal think tanks, and the mainstream media, all of which is viewed by conservatives as leftist and biased.
Are you serious with that nonsense?

Polls are taken by both party's and most are close with their findings.

Always a scapegoat with cons nowadays. Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower are rolling in their graves.
 

EatTheRich

President
Well, as a matter of fact, pollsters usually sample a lot more Democrats than Republicans, (probably because a lot of polls are taken during the day when Republicans are working at a job and Democrats are home watching soap operas thanks to welfare checks).
No, it’s because the population includes a lot more Democrats than Republicans.
 

EatTheRich

President
You didn't read it.
Here's the quote from God:
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”

To bring you up to speed, this is the Bible claiming a baby is a human being.
For the Bible's view on abortion, you need to look in the Book of Exodus, to the section on the Ten Commandments, where one says "thou shalt not kill."

Your side of the aisle has maintained that a baby is a useless group of cells, (a distinction only determined by the mother) that can be killed even an hour after birth.) The Bible defines a baby as a human being.
That’s a quote from the author of Jeremiah. Not from God. Anyway “before I formed you in the womb I knew you” suggests that there’s nothing special about conception.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
That’s a quote from the author of Jeremiah. Not from God. Anyway “before I formed you in the womb I knew you” suggests that there’s nothing special about conception.
even YOU once looked like this

1656381828741.png
would you rather have been sucked by by a vaccum
 
Have you ever heard of sick days and, more importantly, know the historical significance of Obama's inauguration?


Are you serious with that nonsense?

Polls are taken by both party's and most are close with their findings.

Always a scapegoat with cons nowadays. Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower are rolling in their graves.
1. The historical significance of Obama's inauguration was it was the start of massive Muslim terrorism, Obama-inspired race riots, and a SINKING economy of 2015/2016 rescued by the rising GDPs of Trump in 2017/2018.

2. Generally Republicans do not answer polls, seeing them as part of the leftist media enemy. All Republicans know this. Few Democrats do.
 
even YOU once looked like this

View attachment 71071
would you rather have been sucked by by a vaccum
What could be a more low-life and downright creepy occupation than being an abortion doctor ?

If I ever met a woman whom I was attracted to, and initially considered as a possible love interest, and she told me she was an abortion doctor, without saying one word, I would get up out of my seat and walk away.
 

reason10

Governor
Have you ever heard of sick days and, more importantly, know the historical significance of Obama's inauguration?

You have to have a job to get a sick day. A left wing welfare bum just needs to turn off The View and walk out of the house.


Are you serious with that nonsense?

Polls are taken by both party's and most are close with their findings.

When you make the polling calls during the day, you won't get anyone who is actually working a job for a living. All you get are left wingers, because they are m mostly on welfare.

Always a scapegoat with cons nowadays. Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower are rolling in their graves.

And you somehow think Lincoln, TR, and Ike would be okay with crushing a baby' skull and sucking him or her into a sink? Seriously?

Eisenhower's troops never saw any horrors like that when they liberated the concentration camps.
 

Jen

Just me... take it or leave it.
The decision of R v W has verified that they see women as second class citizens.
The RvW decision did no such thing.

That decision took an arbitrary decision that makes it legal to kill unborn babies back to the states. Abortion should have always been an issue that each state would vote for thus giving the power to the people.... to women.

If your state has laws regarding abortion that you don't like, then elect different legislators.
 

EatTheRich

President
The RvW decision did no such thing.

That decision took an arbitrary decision that makes it legal to kill unborn babies back to the states. Abortion should have always been an issue that each state would vote for thus giving the power to the people.... to women.

If your state has laws regarding abortion that you don't like, then elect different legislators.
Allowing women to choose for themselves was not “arbitrary” … it was the inevitable consequence of treating them as fully human.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Jen

Jen

Just me... take it or leave it.
Allowing women to choose for themselves was not “arbitrary” … it was the inevitable consequence of treating them as fully human.
Choosing to kill one's own baby is a choice that should be discouraged rather then encouraged. Women are not empowered by the right to kill their children. They are empowered by the right not to give their bodies to every man who smiles at them. They are empowered by being able to say "no" to sex. Women are empowered by having children when and by whom they choose.

Taking the life of a tiny, defenseless baby she should be willing to protect with her own life does not in any way make a woman "fully human". It diminishes her in every way possible.
 

EatTheRich

President
Choosing to kill one's own baby is a choice that should be discouraged rather then encouraged. Women are not empowered by the right to kill their children. They are empowered by the right not to give their bodies to every man who smiles at them. They are empowered by being able to say "no" to sex. Women are empowered by having children when and by whom they choose.

Taking the life of a tiny, defenseless baby she should be willing to protect with her own life does not in any way make a woman "fully human". It diminishes her in every way possible.
The court took away women’s right to have children when and with whom they choose. Which will make it much easier for employers, landlords, etc., to coerce women into sex when they don’t want it.
 

Jen

Just me... take it or leave it.
The court took away women’s right to have children when and with whom they choose. Which will make it much easier for employers, landlords, etc., to coerce women into sex when they don’t want it.
I disagree.
 

Jen

Just me... take it or leave it.
The court took away women’s right to have children when and with whom they choose. Which will make it much easier for employers, landlords, etc., to coerce women into sex when they don’t want it.
I disagree.
What part of my factual post do you disagree with?
All of it.

No woman's right to have a child and choose the father has been taken away.

Rape and sexual coercion are still crimes. That has not changed.
 

EatTheRich

President
I disagree.

All of it.

No woman's right to have a child and choose the father has been taken away.

Rape and sexual coercion are still crimes. That has not changed.
And if every unwanted pregnancy resulted from “Rape and sexual coercion” you would have a point.
 

Jen

Just me... take it or leave it.
If you're LGBT, you're next on their hit list.
The overturning of Roe V Wade is, indeed, the first step ... the step to bring us from the far and disgusting edges of the Left back to a sane center.
*States should make the decisions about abortion according to what their population want and need.
*Toleration of everyone's lifestyle is one thing. Catering to every deviant behavior, protection of pedophiles and rapists is quite another. The Left has us teetering on the edge of a requirement for complete acceptance of pedophiles as "normal" activities.

So perverts ARE next on the list. I doubt that any LGBT people who aren't molesting children or flashing their genitals to the public will be bothered by the reigning in of flagrant perversion.
 

Jen

Just me... take it or leave it.
And if every unwanted pregnancy resulted from “Rape and sexual coercion” you would have a point.
What you are saying is that if a woman screws up and gets pregnant when she didn't want a baby.......she should be able to kill that baby as if that tiny human life was no more than an oopsy daisy. I adamantly disagree.

Anyone wrong with people taking responsibility for their actions BEFORE a pregnancy occurs?
 
Top