Is there any proof, or even hard evidence, after years of deep investigations into these activities, that any of them did? Nah, you're too busy regurgitating completely discredited theories and cheap guilt by association character assassination to look into the distinct and abject absence of any such evidence.
For using unidentified sources - you know, like your reporter in that NBC disinformation piece did. LOL!
The overarching fact is that Trump remains unindicted.
Trump has been under investigation for a decade. Link us to all the investigations of Biden, why don't ya...
While guys like Biden go around being referred to in the national press as "the senator from MBNA" without ever even being sniffed by the gendarmes, amirite?
Criminal indictments? Got a link?
Where did I ever suggest they didn't? No states pursued my "approach to covid." Sweden did the most and ended up coming through it just fine:
www.theweek.co.uk
When you attacked the idea of investigating their funny business.Where did I ever suggest they didn't? No states pursued my "approach to covid." Sweden did the most and ended up coming through it just fine:
Did Sweden’s Covid-19 experiment pay off in the end?
Scandinavian country had lower excess death rate than many but immigrants and elderly bore the brunt
I didn't - I passionately defended the facts.
www.politicaljack.com
How many times did you defend Guccifer 2.0 before finding out they were Russian intelligence?Where did I ever suggest they didn't? No states pursued my "approach to covid." Sweden did the most and ended up coming through it just fine:
Did Sweden’s Covid-19 experiment pay off in the end?
Scandinavian country had lower excess death rate than many but immigrants and elderly bore the brunt
I didn't - I passionately defended the facts.
link to all the indictments. Durham has been at it for three years.
He got fired for using his own lawyers as sources and keeping that hidden. His stories have been shown to be more rumor and innuendo than based in fact. He was fired by Fox news as well as The Hill
www.politico.com
You keep arguing that there should have been no investigation.
Where did I ever say there shouldn't have been an investigation of the DNC hack? I'd love to see areal (public) investigation of that. One focused on:
And again, none of his stories were removed. He used "unnamed sources" - just like your NBC story on Kilimnik. Were "his lawyers" in a position to provide factual information on the matters he wrote about? Evidently the were, or you'd be "hair on fire" incensed about his failure to retract the stories.He got fired for using his own lawyers as sources and keeping that hidden. His stories have been shown to be more rumor and innuendo than based in fact. He was fired by Fox news as well as The Hill
The Hill finds John Solomon 'failed' to identify key details of sources
The publication reviewed the former columnist's work after it came under scrutiny during the impeachment inquiry.
Fox News Parts Ways With John Solomon, Architect of Trump’s Ukraine Conspiracies
The pro-Trump writer became a paid contributor as he was a fixture on Fox’s right-wing opinion programming, despite the network’s research arm warning of his “disinformation.”
Fox News Parts Ways With John Solomon, Architect of Trump’s Ukraine Conspiracies
The pro-Trump writer became a paid contributor as he was a fixture on Fox’s right-wing opinion programming, despite the network’s research arm warning of his “disinformation.”www.thedailybeast.com
Look who's bandying about the CIA in a piss poor "appeal to authority." When did the commies fall in love with the spooks at the CIA? Don't tell me - I bet it was when Obama put the commie in charge of it...amirite?
What's your point?Obamagate
It will be a happy day when John Brennan goes to prison. He claims he has nothing to hide. He has had a few problems in the past, however: You may recall, as director of the CIA, Brennan oversaw an operation of illegal spying on a staffer of the legislative branch of the United States...
Not according to the WHO - read the article.
read why he was fired by Fox.And again, none of his stories were removed. He used "unnamed sources" - just like your NBC story on Kilimnik. Were "his lawyers" in a position to provide factual information on the matters he wrote about? Evidently the were, or you'd be "hair on fire" incensed about his failure to retract the stories.
As for his reporting on Ukraine efforts to hurt Trump in 2016, he's not alone:
Ukraine Worked With Democrats Against Trump in Election 2016 to Stop Putin. That Bet Backfired Badly.
Ukrainian-Democratic coordination traces back to 2014, when then-Obama Vice President Joe Biden helped install Petro Poroshenko in Kiev. Then came collusion against Trump. By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvwww.realclearinvestigations.com
I thought you accepted the broadly accepted conclusion that they were GRU, based on the evidence made public.
