New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

They tried to wipe it from history

Colorforms

Senator
No, I don’t. I argue for concrete measures to reduce racial inequality ... to which you hysterically object.
You argue for violence and discrimination. You chose to perpetuate inequity and further racial division. It's what lefties do, and you fall right in line every time.
 

EatTheRich

President
You argue for violence and discrimination. You chose to perpetuate inequity and further racial division. It's what lefties do, and you fall right in line every time.
Just more of your “War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength” inversion of reality.
 

EatTheRich

President
What does that even mean? And how do you get "solidarity" by discriminating against whites and Asians?
It means uniting people of different races against the common capitalist oppressor.

It only looks like “discrimination” to those so accustomed to unearned racial privilege that a merit-based system looks like a punishment.
 

Colorforms

Senator
It means uniting people of different races against the common capitalist oppressor.

It only looks like “discrimination” to those so accustomed to unearned racial privilege that a merit-based system looks like a punishment.
Ah, so discriminating against Whites and Asians only LOOKS like discrimination because their place in the country is "unearned" and they're not worthy of being treated as equals.

Wow, that should bring people together. :)
 

EatTheRich

President
Wow, that should bring people together. :)
[/QUOTE]
No. My point is that it is not “discriminating against whites and Asians” to continue to protect Asians’ rights to be included while reducing the extent of discrimination in favor of whites.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Wow, that should bring people together. :)
No. My point is that it is not “discriminating against whites and Asians” to continue to protect Asians’ rights to be included while reducing the extent of discrimination in favor of whites.
[/QUOTE]

What you have supported is exactly racial discrimination against whites and Asians, particularly in regards to college admissions.

What you're proposing is essentially black supremacy. And to say that whites and Asians aren't worthy of being treated as equals is just as racist as claiming blacks shouldn't be treated as equals.
 

EatTheRich

President
No. My point is that it is not “discriminating against whites and Asians” to continue to protect Asians’ rights to be included while reducing the extent of discrimination in favor of whites.
What you have supported is exactly racial discrimination against whites and Asians, particularly in regards to college admissions.

What you're proposing is essentially black supremacy. And to say that whites and Asians aren't worthy of being treated as equals is just as racist as claiming blacks shouldn't be treated as equals.
[/QUOTE]
No. The current system does NOT treat Blacks and Asians as the equals of whites ... DESPITE affirmative action, whites are STILL more likely to get into their first-choice schools with substandard grades and test scores than applicants of any other race. And getting rid of affirmative action would mean a return to the old standard of almost 100% white admissions.
 

Colorforms

Senator
What you have supported is exactly racial discrimination against whites and Asians, particularly in regards to college admissions.

What you're proposing is essentially black supremacy. And to say that whites and Asians aren't worthy of being treated as equals is just as racist as claiming blacks shouldn't be treated as equals.
No. The current system does NOT treat Blacks and Asians as the equals of whites ... DESPITE affirmative action, whites are STILL more likely to get into their first-choice schools with substandard grades and test scores than applicants of any other race. And getting rid of affirmative action would mean a return to the old standard of almost 100% white admissions.
You keep telling that lie even though I have shown multiple times that colleges have actually been discriminating in favor of blacks, and you supported it.

YOU want unequal treatment because YOU don't think whites and Asians deserve what they have worked for.

It really is a sick mindset and certainly divisive. There is really no better way to propagate racism than what you advocate.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
You keep telling that lie even though I have shown multiple times that colleges have actually been discriminating in favor of blacks, and you supported it.

YOU want unequal treatment because YOU don't think whites and Asians deserve what they have worked for.

It really is a sick mindset and certainly divisive. There is really no better way to propagate racism than what you advocate.
You have not "shown" that. You have claimed it, without evidence, in the face of the documented reality that I have linked to.
 

EatTheRich

President
Another one of these "yeah you supplied all these links but I don't care" arguments.

What a waste of time you are.
Feel free to point out where you have linked to a factual article contradicting the scientists’ findings. Opinion pieces from whites supremacist groups are not reliable sources.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Feel free to point out where you have linked to a factual article contradicting the scientists’ findings. Opinion pieces from whites supremacist groups are not reliable sources.
LOL like you're worth the effort anymore. It's already been done once and the effort was wasted. Not happening again.

I do find it interesting, however, that you consider NPR and the Washington times "opinion pieces from white supremacist groups". You have been programmed beyond my ability to impart fact.

Just a good little leftist.
 
Last edited:

EatTheRich

President
LOL like you're worth the effort anymore. It's already been done once and the effort was wasted. Not happening again.

I do find it interesting, however, that you consider NPR and the Washington times "opinion pieces from white supremacist groups". You have been programmed beyond my ability to impart fact.

Just a good little leftist.
You never linked to a news story from either of those sources supporting your claim. An opinion piece, maybe.
 
You don't understand.

I was born and raised in Oklahoma. I had the class 'Oklahoma History'.

That black time in history wasn't in the textbook.

Yet, you till campaign against CRT and Project 1619.

Once again, you're proving my point.
Real-Life Experience Tells Which Version Is the Truth

Selling cocaine is what funded that fake "economic miracle." When the Aframs started hooking rich White teenagers, the authorities fought back and ended the charade.

Or we can believe the Socialist Justice Warlord jurinalists: "Lowlife characters straight out of Deliverance, whose poverty was caused by their own laziness and stupidity, were jealous of the hard-working and intelligent African Americans and destroyed Black Wall Street because it made them look bad."
 

EatTheRich

President
Real-Life Experience Tells Which Version Is the Truth

Selling cocaine is what funded that fake "economic miracle." When the Aframs started hooking rich White teenagers, the authorities fought back and ended the charade.

Or we can believe the Socialist Justice Warlord jurinalists: "Lowlife characters straight out of Deliverance, whose poverty was caused by their own laziness and stupidity, were jealous of the hard-working and intelligent African Americans and destroyed Black Wall Street because it made them look bad."
White business owners organized the pogrom to rid themseves of competition
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
So you're excusing this division by saying "you just don't know".

No, I have never been black, and most of them have never had to deal with the things that I have been through. However, dredging up the past and calling out one group for perpetuating it when they have never done a racist thing in their lives is psychotic. All they are doing is fostering division. But then, that's the modern day leftist.
You probably don't even see the irony in those two sentences....condemning divisiveness while being divisive...
 
Top