New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

This is a serious question

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Again, another BS argument. Women have a uterus and they still make the decisions they do now.

It's not a matter of sex, it's a matter of responsibility and being responsible. You coddle people so that they don't have to be, and it costs the lives of millions.
So those women are not responsible people? You know enough to judge their lives and their ability to raise a child? How about the men who screw and scoot? If you want to eliminate a woman's choice to have an abortion then you should also favor requiring the father to take responsibility as well....both financially and his time raising the child...
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
So those women are not responsible people? You know enough to judge their lives and their ability to raise a child? How about the men who screw and scoot? If you want to eliminate a woman's choice to have an abortion then you should also favor requiring the father to take responsibility as well....both financially and his time raising the child...
A good project for you to work on in da Hood
 

Spamature

President
It may sound comedic but, with the scotus about to rule on Roe v Wade, I think it's relevant.

If forcing a woman to have a child according to your god's will, then shouldn't Viagra be banned because impotence was his will also?
Cancer cells are alive and in your body too.
Also, what about the body of an attached twin hanging off the side of your head.

God's will ?
 
Top