Met and met again.Nope. More of a challenge from me. Which you cannot meet.
Met and met again.Nope. More of a challenge from me. Which you cannot meet.
Yes. There is.Not “anti religion” … separation of church and state.
Because you refuse to answer questions asking you to apply those principles to cases where you claim to decide differently.That's an odd tack.. what makes you think I don't take my own principles seriously? Or is this another one of those you need to tell me what I think type scenarios?
I've answered every question put to me. Just because you and others don't like my answer doesn't mean that I have to change my answerBecause you refuse to answer questions asking you to apply those principles to cases where you claim to decide differently.
Nope. You can demonstrate that you take your principles seriously by asking questions aimed at seeing whether you can support what you say. The Socratic method. Simply claiming you take your principles seriously is an empty gesture.That's an odd tack.. what makes you think I don't take my own principles seriously? Or is this another one of those you need to tell me what I think type scenarios?
Owe me a Coke.Because you refuse to answer questions asking you to apply those principles to cases where you claim to decide differently.
Show where you answered the specific request for information put to you in post #83. Not just where you replied to the post … where you replied by distinguishing as asked between those cases of prayer led by public school officials you deem acceptable and those you deem unacceptable.I've answered every question put to me. Just because you and others don't like my answer doesn't mean that I have to change my answer
Sure. Are Americans freely able to express their faith?Nope. You can demonstrate that you take your principles seriously by asking questions aimed at seeing whether you can support what you say. The Socratic method. Simply claiming you take your principles seriously is an empty gesture.
Sure. I answered in 81.Show where you answered the specific request for information put to you in post #83. Not just where you replied to the post … where you replied by distinguishing as asked between those cases of prayer led by public school officials you deem acceptable and those you deem unacceptable.
Challenged to answer my questions, you decline again and ask a question instead. Even worse, you ask a rhetorical question that I and others have nevertheless answered repeatedly.Sure. Are Americans freely able to express their faith?
So you disagree with the Supreme Court decision about a coach leading prayer?Sure. I answered in 81.
"No. Leads ..no.. if your context is indoctrination.. voluntarily..yes . This is America"
See it? Here it is copied in quotes.
My answer was no. Teachers and coaches cannot lead..in the context of indoctrinating, (and I'll add..nor where it may be prayer lead by requirement organized by the school). But, voluntarily, yes..a coach or teacher may voluntarily pray. This is America. People may join them voluntarily if they so choose .
It's ok. My points are clear all owver this exchangeChallenged to answer my questions, you decline again and ask a question instead. Even worse, you ask a rhetorical question that I and others have nevertheless answered repeatedly.
I rest my case.
Well, yes. Or…no. Maybe…kinda sorta.So you disagree with the Supreme Court decision about a coach leading prayer?