eh, he posted that's what he doesoh my bad....that wasnt you jumping on the get a life routine with the 'he watching his boy on video' routine?
Still not able to post on topic. Can't seem to tell the truth, Eithereh, he posted that's what he does
he damn sure never leaves the safe room with video
would you enjoy a job where the daddy, states away, watched your every move via video while working for the son_______
Simply untrue. Mask mandates verifiably reduced infection levels.No, "me" says the data doesn't support your "fact" in that there is largely no difference in infection levels between areas that masked and those that didn't. And LOL, way to move the goalposts - the mandatory masking was sold on the basis of covid being AN AIRBORNE VIRUS. We could get it simply by breathing the air exhaled by the infected, or so we were told. Now its "larger particulate matter and droplets?" We can protect ourselves from that by simple hand washing, like we have done with every contagious disease since the 1800s. And, in case you haven't noticed, China, which has hands down the strictest forced masking and quarantining regime ever employed, currently has a (conservatively estimated) quarter billion cases. Your "facts" are bullshit.
So even though you have no evidence at all of widespread ballot harvesting, you continue to post not only that there was, but that it illegally or corruptly changed the results of the election.I don't dispute any of them, other than the claim that there wasn't prolific use of "ballot harvesting."
There is no evidence to support claims made by social media users that there is a nationwide effort to “harvest ballots” that will result in massive voter fraud in the 2022 U.S. midterm elections this November.www.reuters.com
There's Reuters "debunking" it...by pointing out that it is perfectly legal (when done properly). Indeed, but how do they know it was "done properly?" They, like you, cite "lack of evidence of ballot fraud." But how do they know everyone involved followed all of the letters of every law? They don't, but, like you, that doesn't stop them from claiming they do.
I have the outcome of the election, whereby suddenly in the middle of election night, representatives from the heavily democratic precincts show up with bushel baskets of "absentee ballots" that put unpopular democrats into office.So even though you have no evidence at all of widespread ballot harvesting, you continue to post not only that there was, but that it illegally or corruptly changed the results of the election.
1. If ballot harvesting took place, the only person who may have violated election law is the person collecting ballots. The voter still cast a legal vote.
2. D'Souza failed to show any evidence of ballot harvesting. In fact, he lied. Cell phone GPS is not as accurate as he claimed, as proven by links I provided to researchers who were tasked with testing various phones in 2019.
Let us know when you actually have some evidence.
From your link:Simply untrue. Mask mandates verifiably reduced infection levels.
The Effectiveness Of Government Masking Mandates On COVID-19 County-Level Case Incidence Across The United States, 2020 | Health Affairs
China has had 1.9 million all-time Covid cases.
COVID-19 Data Explorer - Our World in Data
Exactly, it wasn't anything of "get a life"oh my bad....that wasnt you jumping on the get a life routine with the 'he watching his boy on video' routine?
The outcome of the election is determined by the final count of ballots...not after only the in person votes have been tallied. In most states the absentee ballots are not counted until all in person votes have been counted. You know that. It has been pointed out to you on number of threads.I have the outcome of the election, whereby suddenly in the middle of election night, representatives from the heavily democratic precincts show up with bushel baskets of "absentee ballots" that put unpopular democrats into office.
1. Yeah, so what? Do we really want our politicians elected by people who really don't give a sh*t if they voted?
2. Again, so what? He still showed these people were repeatedly visiting the vicinity of the drop boxes. Does it prove they were putting votes into the drop boxes? No, but it does make you wonder what they were doing.
I especially don't need a defense from you. I think he is actually pointing out what a troll you are.Exactly, it wasn't anything of "get a life"
and neither of us have "161,002" post is why I questioned the #
Mine are higher due to I don't post anywhere but in PJ and I'm not here 24/7 w/lower post counts.............hummmmmmmmmm
MV is suppose to be grown and surely doesn't need defending?