Colorforms
Senator
Look up "private" as in "private twitter account".Look up the First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the government.
Look up "private" as in "private twitter account".Look up the First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the government.
Michigan AG doesn't have jurisdiction over POTUS.
You think presidents are above the law?Michigan AG doesn't have jurisdiction over POTUS.
Sorry ass, I wasn't posting to bugsy, I thought I was posting to you. If you don't know what you are talking about, and that would be the usual state of affairs, then admit itIf you don't know of the hairdresser given 7 days and $7,000 fine for breaking the Law bugs posting of, there's no reason for me and try educating you, do it yourself.
Unconstitutional state laws? You betcha! We all are...You think presidents are above the law?
Well, Baghdad Barr and GOP senators agree with you. But sane people don’t.
Some court has said the law Trump broke is unconstitutional?Unconstitutional state laws? You betcha! We all are...
So, like, did the Michigan legislature pass this law that Trump allegedly broke?Some court has said the law Trump broke is unconstitutional?
Nah, but it looks like you’re walking from the claim that Trump, as POTUS, is above the law. As you should.
I just don’t believe you’re too dopey to know the obvious answer to that question. You’re just pretending to be that dopey as your latest dissembling gambit.So, like, did the Michigan legislature pass this law that Trump allegedly broke?
I know, the answer is "no, they did not." It is an "executive order" which is unlikely to withstand a constitutional challenge.I just don’t believe you’re too dopey to know the obvious answer to that question. You’re just pretending to be that dopey as your latest dissembling gambit.
This didn’t age well. If you watched the whole thing you wouldn’t have posted this- but you enjoy looking stupid. So have at it.Everyone else is wearing a mask per the law, but Trump refuses.
The purpose of such masks, of course, is to protect others. But Trump doesn’t care about others - he’s a sociopath. A lawless sociopath.
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
No. It’s Bugs being Bugs. Sitting at the back of the short bus.So, like, did the Michigan legislature pass this law that Trump allegedly broke?
I said five times above that it was an executive order. Nice of you to finally catch on.I know, the answer is "no, they did not." It is an "executive order" which is unlikely to withstand a constitutional challenge.
Of course it did. It was quite some time before it was known that Trump wore a mask before joining the media. And when it became known I did a thread on that.This didn’t age well. If you watched the whole thing you wouldn’t have posted this- but you enjoy looking stupid. So have at it.
It’s classified as a public forum by the White House. Which is why his account is allowed to post racial incitements that would normally be removed from Twitter.Look up "private" as in "private twitter account".
EOs aren't "laws." And Trump is not subject to state executive orders.I said five times above that it was an executive order. Nice of you to finally catch on.
Is it your view that Trump is above the law because you say the law is “unlikely to withstand a constitutional challenge”?
You have yet to back that up. I posted all I could find on it, and none of it says that he can't use his twitter account as he sees fit. He just has to keep from deleting his tweets.It’s classified as a public forum by the White House. Which is why his account is allowed to post racial incitements that would normally be removed from Twitter.
You must have missed the court ruling saying he can’t block critics.You have yet to back that up. I posted all I could find on it, and none of it says that he can't use his twitter account as he sees fit. He just has to keep from deleting his tweets.
Sure they are. You seem to think that only statutes are laws. Executive orders are also laws. But you again claim that Trump is above the law. Trump thinks so too.EOs aren't "laws." And Trump is not subject to state executive orders.
While executive orders are legally binding, they are not laws; they are instructions on how the executive branch ought to enforce the law. These instructions must line up with existing U.S. laws and the U.S. Constitution.[2]Sure they are. You seem to think that only statutes are laws. Executive orders are also laws. But you again claim that Trump is above the law. Trump thinks so too.
That’s just another way of saying what I said. Executive orders are not statutes, as I said. If one’s semantical niggling leads one to say that only statutes are “laws,” then niggle you will. As your link notes though, EO’s are legally binding. They have the force of law. So, you can quibble away and call them “executive edicts with the force of law,” rather than “laws.”While executive orders are legally binding, they are not laws; they are instructions on how the executive branch ought to enforce the law. These instructions must line up with existing U.S. laws and the U.S. Constitution.[2]