New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Trump: Gimme back those documents the FBI planted!

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Judge - Obama appointee flunky
Jury - nobody surprised by the verdict and that Durham was behind the eight ball from the start, due to pre-trial rulings by Judge Christopher Cooper, as well as the DC Clinton donor jury bias. You mean they let Clinton's guy go ? Shocking!!! :rolleyes:

. Hunter Biden off next then Paul Pelosi etc etc. We all know how this goes by now…Only people not tied to the establishment DC swamp ever face accountability.”
(Donald Trump, Jr.)
Durham hasn't brought shit to the trial to prove guilt.
 

protectionist

Governor
Durham hasn't brought shit to the trial to prove guilt.
Of course he did - including Sussman's documents billing Hillary Clinton for services (whom he told the FBI he had not spoken to). Your post is ludicrous and with condom's endorsement, that worsens it.

And how could Durham bring stuff to trial when the biased judge kept him from doing that ? Some awfully 1661084797038.png posting goes on in this forum. Lesser quality than US Message Board.
 
Last edited:

Raoul_Luke

I feel a bit lightheaded. Maybe you should drive.
You mean the Russian hack and collusion investigation?

In my opinion, a campaign that has over 100 contacts with the Russian government and two campaign advisors who have worked directly for or with Putin, even as the Russians put effort into getting the candidate elected is pretty much justification for an investigation.

There was no hoax. It was an honest investigation that did not claim to find evidence of collusion. If the intent was to frame Trump then why didn't they do it?
What is your opinion on an "investigation" run by hacks with "over 100" anti-Trump texts and emails?
 

EatTheRich

President
Of course he did - including Sussman's documents billing Hillary Clinton for services (whom he told the FBI he had not spoken to). Your post is ludicrous and with condom's endorsement, that worsens it.

And how could Durham bring stuff to trial when the biased judge kept him from doing that ? Some awefully View attachment 72065 posting goes on in this forum. Lesser quality than US Message Board.
He’s trying the case in the media because he doesn’t have that kind of evidence to bring to court.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Of course he did - including Sussman's documents billing Hillary Clinton for services (whom he told the FBI he had not spoken to). Your post is ludicrous and with condom's endorsement, that worsens it.

And how could Durham bring stuff to trial when the biased judge kept him from doing that ? Some awefully View attachment 72065 posting goes on in this forum. Lesser quality than US Message Board.
Do you really think a lawyer would have to speak to Hillary to have done work for her campaign?

Durham failed to present evidence that he was directed by the campaign to speak to the FBI.

You claim Durham had evidence he wasn't allowed to use. Prove it.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Judge - Obama appointee flunky
Jury - nobody surprised by the verdict and that Durham was behind the eight ball from the start, due to pre-trial rulings by Judge Christopher Cooper, as well as the DC Clinton donor jury bias. You mean they let Clinton's guy go ? Shocking!!! :rolleyes:

. Hunter Biden off next then Paul Pelosi etc etc. We all know how this goes by now…Only people not tied to the establishment DC swamp ever face accountability.”
(Donald Trump, Jr.)
Cooper was confirmed by a vote of 100-0 by the senate in 2014. Of course, any judge that doesn't suck up to the Trump crew is a target for you....

So what rulings did the judge use to wreck Durham's case?

 

protectionist

Governor
Do you really think a lawyer would have to speak to Hillary to have done work for her campaign?

Durham failed to present evidence that he was directed by the campaign to speak to the FBI.

You claim Durham had evidence he wasn't allowed to use. Prove it.
What I claimed was that Sussman had told the FBI that he had no contact with Hillary Clinton. Durham was able to prove otherwise, with Sussman's document billing Hillary for services.

Some people have to be told twice. :rolleyes:
 

protectionist

Governor
Cooper was confirmed by a vote of 100-0 by the senate in 2014. Of course, any judge that doesn't suck up to the Trump crew is a target for you....

So what rulings did the judge use to wreck Durham's case?

Any judge that sucks up to the anti-Trump movement is a hero for you.

For starters, Cooper has enough conflicts of interest that he never should have been anywhere near a court in DC.
1. He is married to Amy Jeffries, Lisa Page’s lawyer since at least 2018, and current corrupt AG Merrick Garland presided over their marriage. Page was fired for misconduct, having played a pivotal role in both the Clinton-emails and Trump-Russia probes, including in the efforts to pursue both Gen. Mike Flynn—wrecking his reputation and finances—and former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page—foisting a fraud on the FISA court while undermining basic civil liberties.
1661132766459.png
2. Cooper and Michael Sussmann both worked in the DOJ together. Cooper has even described himself, and the accused, Michael Sussmann, as "professional acquaintances." The two overlapped in President Bill Clinton's DOJ.
3. Cooper first refused to allow a Hillary Clinton tweet be used in the case against Sussmann where Hillary claimed candidate Trump was connected to Russia. We now know that this entire story was a lie.
4. Cooper allowed some Hillary Clinton donors be admitted in the jury pool.
5. Cooper's wife, Amy Jeffress contributed $2,700 to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign. She and her husband Judge Cooper—prior to his appointment to the court—had routinely cut checks to Democratic candidates and the DNC. Blatant violation of the legal principle “Nemo iudex in causa sua,”
6. As for more rulings by the judge to wreck Durham's case, law professor Jonathan as Turley notes, Cooper has "barred Durham from arguing that there was a 'joint venture' in deception [between Sussmann and Rodney Joffe] with the Clinton campaign," "limited the evidence that Durham can present" and "refused prosecution access to some evidence and, while allowing access to some emails between the campaign and an opposition-research firm [Fusion GPS]...barred their introduction at trial due to the late request from the prosecutors."
7. Jury selection was a fiasco. Here, Cooper's rulings overruled prosecutors when they objected to the seating of several jurors. One was a Hillary donor. 2 others were AOC donors. Another was a member of the Sierra Club, who said she thought police ought to be defunded. Still another prospective juror said her husband worked for Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign. She too was permitted to remain on the panel. One juror whose daughter plays on the same high school crew team as Sussmann's.
8. Cooper refused to allow the infamous Sussman text to FBI General Counsel James Baker, specifically saying that he wasn’t coming in to see him on behalf of a client. the judge just ruled on Thursday that the prosecution can’t argue in its summation that the text is the false statement with which he is charged, thereby taking away that smoking gun.
9. This is a complicated case and the judge made it be far more complicated than necessary. We could get into all the semantics and complexities, but that would be more concentration on one issue (which is already past), taking tome away from the dozens of ither issues that need attention, Enough has already been posted here to show that Cooper should not have been the judge in this case, and his rulings were heavily biased.

 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Any judge that sucks up to the anti-Trump movement is a hero for you.

For starters, Cooper has enough conflicts of interest that he never should have been anywhere near a court in DC.
1. He is married to Amy Jeffries, Lisa Page’s lawyer since at least 2018, and current corrupt AG Merrick Garland presided over their marriage. Page was fired for misconduct, having played a pivotal role in both the Clinton-emails and Trump-Russia probes, including in the efforts to pursue both Gen. Mike Flynn—wrecking his reputation and finances—and former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page—foisting a fraud on the FISA court while undermining basic civil liberties.
View attachment 72067
2. Cooper and Michael Sussmann both worked in the DOJ together. Cooper has even described himself, and the accused, Michael Sussmann, as "professional acquaintances." The two overlapped in President Bill Clinton's DOJ.
3. Cooper first refused to allow a Hillary Clinton tweet be used in the case against Sussmann where Hillary claimed candidate Trump was connected to Russia. We now know that this entire story was a lie.
4. Cooper allowed some Hillary Clinton donors be admitted in the jury pool.
5. Cooper's wife, Amy Jeffress contributed $2,700 to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign. She and her husband Judge Cooper—prior to his appointment to the court—had routinely cut checks to Democratic candidates and the DNC. Blatant violation of the legal principle “Nemo iudex in causa sua,”
6. As for more rulings by the judge to wreck Durham's case, law professor Jonathan as Turley notes, Cooper has "barred Durham from arguing that there was a 'joint venture' in deception [between Sussmann and Rodney Joffe] with the Clinton campaign," "limited the evidence that Durham can present" and "refused prosecution access to some evidence and, while allowing access to some emails between the campaign and an opposition-research firm [Fusion GPS]...barred their introduction at trial due to the late request from the prosecutors."
7. Jury selection was a fiasco. Here, Cooper's rulings overruled prosecutors when they objected to the seating of several jurors. One was a Hillary donor. 2 others were AOC donors. Another was a member of the Sierra Club, who said she thought police ought to be defunded. Still another prospective juror said her husband worked for Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign. She too was permitted to remain on the panel. One juror whose daughter plays on the same high school crew team as Sussmann's.
8. Cooper refused to allow the infamous Sussman text to FBI General Counsel James Baker, specifically saying that he wasn’t coming in to see him on behalf of a client. the judge just ruled on Thursday that the prosecution can’t argue in its summation that the text is the false statement with which he is charged, thereby taking away that smoking gun.
9. This is a complicated case and the judge made it be far more complicated than necessary. We could get into all the semantics and complexities, but that would be more concentration on one issue (which is already past), taking tome away from the dozens of ither issues that need attention, Enough has already been posted here to show that Cooper should not have been the judge in this case, and his rulings were heavily biased.
Lotsa smoke..no fire.

Durham had to ptove one thing...that he went to the FBI on the instructions of his client. He failed.
 
Top