Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
What post says, I am gonna shoot_______?His post threatening to shoot people.
Try to pay attention.
None.
I win!
What post says, I am gonna shoot_______?His post threatening to shoot people.
Try to pay attention.
The reason then: an import tariff. The reason now: the systematic police murder of hundreds every year.there was a reason... here, it is an incongruous reaction to the tragedy
Did you think the tea belonged to the ptrotesters?no. they're not. One protested. The other robs a target.
Evidence?No, they police other conservatives harder then they police Trump. Liberals can say what they want.
Thus being called out on this issue.
Who are “you people”?You do understand that if "you people tm" would not kill black folk this would not happen. First Georgia, then this in Minneapolis. Tsk...Tsk!
hmm. i'm pretty sure it's not that cut and dried... but, no matters... anarchists need them some anarchy..The reason then: an import tariff. The reason now: the systematic police murder of hundreds every year.
no. why would you even suggest such a thing..Did you think the tea belonged to the ptrotesters?
You seemed to distinguish what the Boston Tea Party protesters were doing from “robbery” by protesters today. But in both cases they were taking property that didn’t belong to them.no. why would you even suggest such a thing..
if they (today's protesters) were looting your store, or your home... you'd be cheering?
And, no, I’m not “cheering” looters at all. Just pointing out that protests don’t always take the form of a polite admonition over sweet tea and cucumber sandwiches with the mayor.no. why would you even suggest such a thing..
if they (today's protesters) were looting your store, or your home... you'd be cheering?
no. ive offered no distinction. posters seem to want to interject it repeatedly as though it had some bearing. it doenst. these are common thieves with no higher purposeYou seemed to distinguish what the Boston Tea Party protesters were doing from “robbery” by protesters today. But in both cases they were taking property that didn’t belong to them.
again.. it it were your house, or business, you'd sing a different song..And, no, I’m not “cheering” looters at all. Just pointing out that protests don’t always take the form of a polite admonition over sweet tea and cucumber sandwiches with the mayor.
You are ignoring the context of protests against systematic police murder.no. ive offered no distinction. posters seem to want to interject it repeatedly as though it had some bearing. it doenst. these are common thieves with no higher purpose
no i'm not. we're discussing wanton theft and destruction..You are ignoring the context of protests against systematic police murder.
People do care, which is why they rise up in revolt against this rotten system and the police violence that maintains it.no i'm not. we're discussing wanton theft and destruction..
systematic...connotes a volume of murders that requires redress..
take chicago killings...for example.. that's rampant systematic killing..yet no one gives much of a shit.. why is that?
bull shit. statistically there a minute fraction of an overwhelming majority of decent committed servants.People do care, which is why they rise up in revolt against this rotten system and the police violence that maintains it.
It’s not a matter of individual police being corrupt, it’s a matter of the institution being inherently violent and oppressive, by virtue of its social role maintaining the class rule of the wealthy (thereby limiting the options of the poor and often driving people into lives of violent crime by economic imperative).bull shit. statistically there a minute fraction of an overwhelming majority of decent committed servants.
Does this man deserve to go to jail? absolutely. and those officers stand trial to ascertain their role in the crime? absolutely.
are all police corrupt like these? no.
Absolutely not.
PS.. no one is rising in Chicago where deaths number in the dozens.. in a weekend... why is that?
odd stuff. no such imperative exists.. other than among a relative few..It’s not a matter of individual police being corrupt, it’s a matter of the institution being inherently violent and oppressive, by virtue of its social role maintaining the class rule of the wealthy (thereby limiting the options of the poor and often driving people into lives of violent crime by economic imperative).
Are you seriously so ignorant as to think that Chicago has never risen in revolt?
Now the criminals are “a relative few” ... a few minutes ago their activity was so pressing that we couldn’t possibly deal with any other matter (like government-sanctioned brutality) until all crime ceased.odd stuff. no such imperative exists.. other than among a relative few..
and, i'm sorry? dont go backhand fellah....we're just having a conversation.. one youre executing poorly, but a conversation none the less..
anarchy is for barbarians.. ours is a nation of law.
silly tag lines will not result in progress, that's for sure..Now the criminals are “a relative few” ... a few minutes ago their activity was so pressing that we couldn’t possibly deal with any other matter (like government-sanctioned brutality) until all crime ceased.
The law in this country is a tool of the ruling class. You don’t free yourself using your master’s tools.
It is all there in the open, look for yourself, I am not spending the day combing the vast wasteland that is Twitter. The threats of violence etc. that Phil pointed out, the constant assertions for the last four years that our President was a puppet of the Kremlin, by several MSM organizations...Evidence?