No, he's not. That's how they see it. You need to take them at their word on the matter and let that sober you up as to threat they are. In here its hair on fire. Out there it's a calm debate of reason that must take place not with their choir but for those listening to the two competing choirs: the independents.
It doesn't matter whether he said it or not. He supports only democrats and THEY want to register (and confiscate) all guns. Watch what they do, not what they say.
When Rittenhouse lawyers start the lawsuits they need come to PJ and send you a letter to appear
www.breitbart.com
No comparison to Rittenhouse Case
No...your limitations ...
No, you don’t have a right to defend yourself against people who are themselves defending themselves against your unlawful attack.
Ah, yes. But that is not what occurred.
If the “evidence” favors that self-serving view, why wasn’t anyone else beaten? Why was Rittenhouse the only one threatened?
You ignore the part of the video showing Rittenhouse chasing people and pointing his gun at them, before they start pursuing him to disarm him.
Grosskreutz had a clear shot at Rittenhouse when Rittenhouse was killing Huber. If his intent had been to kill, he would have shot then, as Rittenhouse knew.
Where is your evidence they went there to do any of that? Oh, wait, there isn’t any … you just made that up.
Almost as if Rittenhouse did something to provoke them that the others didn’t.
Everyone else managed not to shoot anyone. If Rittenhouse couldn’t have done the same, he shouldn’t have gone there. But of course he had no other reason to go.
It was clearly self-defense on the part of Rittenhouse’s victims. The right loves to accuse the left of what they are doing.
And you think the people trying to interrupt the violence reviewed the video before trying to disarm Rittenhouse?Nah, you need to repeatedly absolve yourself of reason in order to maintain your false narrative..
Kenosha protester charged with firing gun right before Kyle Rittenhouse began shooting
Kyle Rittenhouse's supporters say he fired his rifle in Kenosha after reacting to a nearby shot. That first shooter has now been charged.www.google.com
It is literally available everywhere, on the internet, in the testimony, as evidence admitted as the result of testimony, and in the actual video
Continue to lie though....it suits you
Probably because they didn’t know who fired first, and assumed it was the guy with the AR-15 who had been threatening all of them all night.
No, but White supremacists contributed lavishly on GoFundMe.
