Cops/National GuardI'm backing my shit up too, as shown.
Tell me, why aren't cities all across the nation burning day and night 24/7/365?
Cops/National GuardI'm backing my shit up too, as shown.
Tell me, why aren't cities all across the nation burning day and night 24/7/365?
You lump everyone among the protesters together: if one person starts a fire they are all arsonists. What it means that one person was seen with Ziminski is that Ziminski was in the same town they were in. There is no evidence he or anyone seen with him started a fire, and no evidence that when he fired his gun it was not to deter an immediate deadly threat from Rittenhouse or one of his Proud Boys allies. It is not surprising or revelatory that people wanted to harm Rittenhouse after he started shooting unarmed protesters.Its not a self serving view to speak on the facts of the matter. It's self serving to speak in a context that doesn't exist, which would fall on your narrative
Ziminski et all we're seen together several times, presumably planning on what to burn next, and were saying they wanted to get, kill, kick the ass of Rittenhouse. So there's that
.
And that explains why the same crowd that wasn’t chasing or beating anyone came to “attack” Rittenhouse, no?I don't.
If you mean the part prior to the initial shooting when Ziminski fired and the others said get him....
Then I've seen that yes.
What do the unproven charges against Ziminski have to do with the people Rittenhouse shot?You really suck at this.
BREAKING: New Footage Shows Moment Kyle Rittenhouse Was Attacked By Rosenbaum, Ziminski
New footage shows the moment Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked by a group of rioters on August 24, 2020. The teenager can be seen, by himself, walking down a road while offering medical assistance. “Medical!” Rittenhouse, who was equipped with a first aid kit, could be hear shouting. He then came...nationalfile.com
Somehow it didn’t annoy “the rioting arsons” (as you call the protesters who tried to defend themselves against his aggression) that other people were there. Only him. What made his presence different?Yes. He was there. That annoyed the rioting arsons
It's dirty laundry for the media. Remember my post with the song from Henley about how the media loves the bs that brings the dollars in?I did speak up.No I don't ....if you think there is some correlation to the events in Kenosha (the topic), then speak up.
Cities not burning across the nation mean what? These purposeful riots are to? (Still mean little to law-abiding people ie. Most Americans.
Then don't look like you're defending the right wing argument and not trying to do what would end the strife.I'm still not right wing.. my opinion is these were thieves and slobs destroying shit, lashing out because they are failures in life.
Rosenbaum, the first person he killed, was a Kenosha resident, while Rittenhouse lived in a different state. Anyway, the right of the others to peaceably assemble there was protected by the 1st Amendment, which does not in the same way protect violent provocations like Rittenhouse’s.He had the same right to be there as anyone else, all of whom lived the same distance from or further than Rittenhouse
Yes, in response to his terrorist attack.No, the evidence showed the tried to kick his ass or kill him
So you continue to claim, without any evidence.Yes, but not the people we're discussing
How many times must I do that?Post the video or STFU
No I don't. I've specifically addressed the three or four that were involved. I provided reference to Ziminski being charged for arson. As well as links outlining what they were up to.You lump everyone among the protesters together: if one person starts a fire they are all arsonists. What it means that one person was seen with Ziminski is that Ziminski was in the same town they were in. There is no evidence he or anyone seen with him started a fire, and no evidence that when he fired his gun it was not to deter an immediate deadly threat from Rittenhouse or one of his Proud Boys allies. It is not surprising or revelatory that people wanted to harm Rittenhouse after he started shooting unarmed protesters.
No..because Rittenhouse actions followed Ziminskis, and the guy with the chain etc was going for him.... Remember Rittenhouse fked until they were between the cars ...that was after the Ziminski shotAnd that explains why the same crowd that wasn’t chasing or beating anyone came to “attack” Rittenhouse, no?
Well..in this instance it dispels your liesWhat do the unproven charges against Ziminski have to do with the people Rittenhouse shot?
I'm not defending the right wing argument. The rw argument positions him as some hero. I don't support thatIt's dirty laundry for the media. Remember my post with the song from Henley about how the media loves the bs that brings the dollars in?
Plutocracy
Our nation is on a fast downward spiral. As I've said many times, I see it as how it's happening...
1. Democracy
2. Plutocracy
3. Fascist state
We're fast approaching #3
Then don't look like you're defending the right wing argument and not trying to do what would end the strife.
It's....dirty laundry.
Grossy lived in same state as KRRosenbaum, the first person he killed, was a Kenosha resident, while Rittenhouse lived in a different state. Anyway, the right of the others to peaceably assemble there was protected by the 1st Amendment, which does not in the same way protect violent provocations like Rittenhouse’s.
I listed where who resided upstream....Rosenbaum, the first person he killed, was a Kenosha resident, while Rittenhouse lived in a different state. Anyway, the right of the others to peaceably assemble there was protected by the 1st Amendment, which does not in the same way protect violent provocations like Rittenhouse’s.
You haven't posted the video yet as I've seenHow many times must I do that?
No. That is a lie..and you can't substantiate beyond your lies.Yes, in response to his terrorist attack.
The terrorist died or lost part of his armYes, in response to his terrorist attack.
Zimmy started the shooting........What do the unproven charges against Ziminski have to do with the people Rittenhouse shot?