Very shortly Elon Musk will be showing the collusion between Twitter and the WH

[Sickofleft]

Pwehaps we'll see whether the 2020 election was compromised.

More and more information is released from the Twitter Files.

Absent the FBI and Government involvement it would actually be fine, Twitter is a private company that can have people on its platform or not it is up to them.... however when speech is being restricted at the behest of the Federal Gov't that is clear violation of the 1st Amendment.

They banned and restricted anyone who ran contrary to the regime talking points, from the 2020 election to COVID19.

If you think this is not happening at YouTube, Facebook, Google... you are lying to yourself or you are OK with it because they are doing it for "your" side.

Every Time Twitter Execs Lied To Our Faces About Shadowbanning

Remember all the times Jack Dorsey and Vijaya Gadde assured us Twitter doesn't shadowban or target conservatives? Well, they lied.

thefederalist.com

 

[Boltlady]

More and more information is released from the Twitter Files.

Absent the FBI and Government involvement it would actually be fine, Twitter is a private company that can have people on its platform or not it is up to them.... however when speech is being restricted at the behest of the Federal Gov't that is clear violation of the 1st Amendment.

They banned and restricted anyone who ran contrary to the regime talking points, from the 2020 election to COVID19.

If you think this is not happening at YouTube, Facebook, Google... you are lying to yourself or you are OK with it because they are doing it for "your" side.

Every Time Twitter Execs Lied To Our Faces About Shadowbanning

Remember all the times Jack Dorsey and Vijaya Gadde assured us Twitter doesn't shadowban or target conservatives? Well, they lied.

thefederalist.com

There've been a number of times on PJ that I have commented about the number of people here (and elsewhere), who form their opinions based on partial information. Thanks to Elon Musk we are learning that the situation is actually worse than just partial information, their opinions are based on directed information. Yes folks, it's a form of mind control that nobody likes to think they have succumbed to. It's actually being orchestrated by the gov't.

Since it seems that the MSM is avoiding reporting on this it will still be a while before the non believers see what has been going on. As you've stated it is not confined to
Twitter. The other social media giants have been operating the same way.

We can only hope that this enlightenment will lead to strict laws that will put a stop to it. It's really important for all sides of any story to be heard so that truth can be known.

 

[middleview]

Where did I even suggest that? I said LESS PEOPLE WOULD HAVE VOTED FOR BIDEN if the "intelligence" community hadn't gaslighted the electorate by deeming it "propaganda." Again, are you for or against that sort of deep state election meddling? It is a simple question. Because there is no question whatsoever anymore that they did so...

Something else that you cannot actually prove.

The fact is that there is nothing at all on that laptop to indicate a reason not to vote for Joe Biden.

Did anyone stop the NYPost from publishing the article about the laptop? Nope. Was the laptop covered extensively by every single right wing media? Yup. Was it all over Facebook? Yes. The only place that stopped references to it was Twitter.

Again, the 50 retired intelligence people decided it smelled like Russian propaganda. Should they have been silenced because their opinions didn't match yours? You call someone voicing an opinion to be "deep state meddling". Seems odd for you to be so upset about the letter and ignore Trump's attempt to get Ukraine to announce an investigation into Biden, essentially requesting foreign meddling.

in the NYTimes article it says

"No concrete evidence has emerged that the laptop contains Russian Disinformation"
That was printed on 10/22/2020

What We Know and Don’t About Hunter Biden and a Laptop (Published 2020)

President Trump’s allies have promoted claims of corruption aimed at the former vice president’s son in an effort to damage the Biden campaign.

www.nytimes.com

 

[middleview]

More and more information is released from the Twitter Files.

Absent the FBI and Government involvement it would actually be fine, Twitter is a private company that can have people on its platform or not it is up to them.... however when speech is being restricted at the behest of the Federal Gov't that is clear violation of the 1st Amendment.

They banned and restricted anyone who ran contrary to the regime talking points, from the 2020 election to COVID19.

If you think this is not happening at YouTube, Facebook, Google... you are lying to yourself or you are OK with it because they are doing it for "your" side.

Every Time Twitter Execs Lied To Our Faces About Shadowbanning

Remember all the times Jack Dorsey and Vijaya Gadde assured us Twitter doesn't shadowban or target conservatives? Well, they lied.

thefederalist.com

So the FBI warning Twitter about Russian propaganda was equivalent to Congress passing a law prohibiting speech?

Here is the first amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

[middleview]

Pwehaps we'll see whether the 2020 election was compromised.

So now you think the Trump WH worked with Twitter to compromise the election? You do know who was president in November 2020, right?

 

[EvMetro]

Pwehaps we'll see whether the 2020 election was compromised.

We already know that it WAS compromised. Regardless of any government collusion, candidates on one side were censored and suppressed to give an unfair advantage to the other side. That's cheating.

 

[EvMetro]

So the FBI warning Twitter about Russian propaganda was equivalent to Congress passing a law prohibiting speech?

Here is the first amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

 

[EvMetro]

Twitter is American so of course it isn't "interference in our elections" it "participation in our elections"

I think monopoly is an American game. If you steal a bunch of the monopoly money before the game, it is still called cheating. It's not illegal, but it is still cheating. Regardless of if it is legal or not, censoring and suppressing information to give an advantage to your favorite political candidate is cheating and interfering too.

 

[ObamacareForever]

I think monopoly is an American game. If you steal a bunch of the monopoly money before the game, it is still called cheating. It's not illegal, but it is still cheating. Regardless of if it is legal or not, censoring and suppressing information to give an advantage to your favorite political candidate is cheating and interfering too.

Yea... what Twitter did is not censoring, nor suppressing, nor cheating, nor interfering.

It is just how american elections work. If you don't like it, tough shit.

 

[EvMetro]

Yea... what Twitter did is not censoring, nor suppressing, nor cheating, nor interfering.

It is just how american elections work. If you don't like it, tough shit.

That's a river. The longest in the world.

Your interpretation above of what censorship is qualifies you to apply to be a moderator.

 

[ObamacareForever]

That's a river. The longest in the world.

Your interpretation above of what censorship is qualifies you to apply to be a moderator.

My interpretation aligns with the 1st Amendment. Yours does not.

 

[EvMetro]

Here's how Wikipedia describes censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

This describes what Twitter did.

 

[EvMetro]

In a landmark 1973 case, Norwood v. Harrison, the Supreme Court held that government “may not induce, encourage or promote private persons to accomplish what it is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish.”

This is what the government did when it colluded with Twitter

 

[ObamacareForever]

Here's how Wikipedia describes censorship:

"Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient". Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies."

This describes what Twitter did.

Twitter didn't suppress any speech. Everyone was and still is able to say anything they damn well please.

 

[EvMetro]

Twitter didn't suppress any speech. Everyone was and still is able to say anything they damn well please.

Lol, this is lefty hall of fame material here. You lose. Folded up like a lawn chair.

 

[Sickofleft]

Oh ok, so as long as Congress does not pass a law the FBI/DOJ and White House may restrict speech all they want, to their little hearts content.....they may even get a private company to pick and choose what can be allowed.....

No Law.... all OK....... says the resident Fascist apologist for the Regime

Wow.... Thanks for clearing that up....

So the FBI warning Twitter about Russian propaganda was equivalent to Congress passing a law prohibiting speech?

Here is the first amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The FBI and the Intelligence Community knew that Hunters laptop was NOT Russian Disinformation.

The FBI specifically breifing Social Media companies on information they know is NOT Russian Propaganda is election interfernence.

 

[Sickofleft]

Something else that you cannot actually prove.

The fact is that there is nothing at all on that laptop to indicate a reason not to vote for Joe Biden.

Did anyone stop the NYPost from publishing the article about the laptop? Nope. Was the laptop covered extensively by every single right wing media? Yup. Was it all over Facebook? Yes. The only place that stopped references to it was Twitter.

Again, the 50 retired intelligence people decided it smelled like Russian propaganda. Should they have been silenced because their opinions didn't match yours? You call someone voicing an opinion to be "deep state meddling". Seems odd for you to be so upset about the letter and ignore Trump's attempt to get Ukraine to announce an investigation into Biden, essentially requesting foreign meddling.

in the NYTimes article it says

"No concrete evidence has emerged that the laptop contains Russian Disinformation"
That was printed on 10/22/2020

What We Know and Don’t About Hunter Biden and a Laptop (Published 2020)

President Trump’s allies have promoted claims of corruption aimed at the former vice president’s son in an effort to damage the Biden campaign.

www.nytimes.com

The 50 Losers who signed the letter LIED. The intelligence community knew the laptop was Hunters and NOT a Russian plot.

The FBI knew this and leaned on Social Media because the story hurt the candidate they backed, along with killing any investigation into it.

These are all facts.

Please reword (as usual) all your questions below reposting your debunked talking points.

 

[Sickofleft]

All you have to do is start a conspiracy theory in an attempt to deflect from the corroborated charges against Trump.

President Biden didn't withhold loan guarantees to protect his son. He, and other bipartisan entities including the EU and World Bank, et al, withheld them to stop a corrupt prosecutor who wouldn't go after corruption.

You know Trump and his minions are fuming at President Biden

Vengeance! coming.....

Right, his son leveraged his ties to this Father to get more money out of Burisma (Joe being the US Gov't point person for policy on the Ukraine) and when Burisma needed a pesky Prosecutor to go away.....

Joe rode to the rescue....... the ass-ole even bragged about it later...

BUT nothing to see, Trump asking about all of this was the problem, NOT the corruption...

The Regime thanks you for your blatant stupidity.

 

[ObamacareForever]

Lol, this is lefty hall of fame material here. You lose. Folded up like a lawn chair.

Except I didn't lose. You can keep spouting off bullshit. But it's why you keep losing elections.
Try coming back to reality.

 

[EvMetro]

Oh ok, so as long as Congress does not pass a law the FBI/DOJ and White House may restrict speech all they want, to their little hearts content.....they may even get a private company to pick and choose what can be allowed.....

No Law.... all OK....... says the resident Fascist apologist for the Regime

Wow.... Thanks for clearing that up....



The FBI and the Intelligence Community knew that Hunters laptop was NOT Russian Disinformation.

The FBI specifically breifing Social Media companies on information they know is NOT Russian Propaganda is election interfernence.

Twitter interfered with the election. They suppressed and censored their political opponents. The evidence of this interference has been exposed by Musk, Taibbi, and Weiss, via twitter. If lefties want to deny that Twitter interfered in the election, let them. They can claim that the world is flat if they like but it's not. Either way, Twitter interfered in the election. Using a form of cheating and corruption called censorship.

Worse yet, Twitter's election cheating and interference was assisted by the government. The cheating, interference, and government collusion really did happen.

Those on this thread who deny Twitter cheated and interfered in the election are not only wrong, but they are also providing aid and support to those who are undermining fair elections.