So if I wasn’t doing that, my mimicry of the rhetoric of those who were defending Rittenhouse’s violence was tongue-in-cheek, no?
I think it's less of a matter of defending rittenhouse's violence, if you think that's the case why don't you take it up with people who are doing that, and more a matter of defending against the blanket statements that you keep spewing. As though everyone on the right or otherwise not a leftist or somehow applauding this something Noble..
I really don't give a shit about those types of dialogue. The fact of the matter is it's a tragedy all around and the premise of self-defense extends equally to all parties involved
On the one hand writtenhouse got caught up in this situation by his own doing, on the other hand so too did everyone else the majority of whom were there to burn and loot and destroy and commit acts of violence
So let's address it from that context and not from the context of Rittenhouse is the only and sole evil doer, and in fact from the reality that it was which is a whole host of evildoers.. on the spectrum of which this kid falls as the least culpable given the circumstances, and in reality as adjudicated by a jury is supported by the facts of the matter