EatTheRich
President
No ... saying people who are men aren’t men because they can get pregnant is not looking at them as people. It is treating reproductive potential as superior to personality.So men aren't people? LMBO!
No ... saying people who are men aren’t men because they can get pregnant is not looking at them as people. It is treating reproductive potential as superior to personality.So men aren't people? LMBO!
Hint, it's why they have OvariesSo you say. Because you look at them not as people but as instruments of reproduction.
No men can get pregnantNo ... saying people who are men aren’t men because they can get pregnant is not looking at them as people. It is treating reproductive potential as superior to personality.
Yes, Affirmative action sought to reduce the level of discriminations, not to increase discrimination of other groups.Affirmative action means putting limits on the extent of racial and sex discrimination. Bull Connor opposed affirmative action, like you. Martin Luther King supported it, like me.
By “unmarginalized” what you mean is “privileged” and by “discrimination against” you mean “reducing the unearned privilege of.”Yes, Affirmative action sought to reduce the level of discriminations, not to increase discrimination of other groups.
You don't support racial equality or affirmative action. You support discrimination against unmarginalized groups and you call it affirmative action, but it's just racial discrimination of different races.
What I mean is that you're okay discriminating against people based on race so long as it's not one of the races considered sacrosanct by fascist leftiesBy “unmarginalized” what you mean is “privileged” and by “discrimination against” you mean “reducing the unearned privilege of.”
A claim you make based on no evidence. Remember that diminishing the amount of discrimination in favor of a group is not the same as discriminating against them.What I mean is that you're okay discriminating against people based on race so long as it's not one of the races considered sacrosanct by fascist lefties
And conversely, discriminating against a racial group that you claim had privilege, is still racial discrimination. Something you have defended on multiple threads.A claim you make based on no evidence. Remember that diminishing the amount of discrimination in favor of a group is not the same as discriminating against them.
lofl, it truly is common theme with that guythere‘s Dawg, talking about male on male sex again. Nobody is surprised.
No, what I’m defending is diminishing the privilege of those who verifiably still have a racial hand up at others’ expense.And conversely, discriminating against a racial group that you claim had privilege, is still racial discrimination. Something you have defended on multiple threads.
Through racial discrimination targeting whites and Asians.No, what I’m defending is diminishing the privilege of those who verifiably still have a racial hand up at others’ expense.
That’s a dishonest characterization. According to you, Martin Luther King supported racial discrimination.Through racial discrimination targeting whites and Asians.
We know
You support racial discrimination.
That isn't a dishonest anything. You support racial discrimination and have defended it on several occasions.That’s a dishonest characterization. According to you, Martin Luther King supported racial discrimination.
Explain how it is “racial discrimination” to place limits on the amount of unearned advantage whites get for being white.That isn't a dishonest anything. You support racial discrimination and have defended it on several occasions.
Unearned advantage? What advantage have blacks earned? Why should whites who score better on entrance exams lose their place because someone else is a color that you prefer?Explain how it is “racial discrimination” to place limits on the amount of unearned advantage whites get for being white.
Even with affirmative action, whites are more likely to get into their first place schools with below-average test scores, edging out both whites and Blacks who score higher on those tests. Affirmative action means more Blacks with a great combination of personality, unique backgrounds, leadership achievements, academic and extracurricular interests, grades, and test scores are admitted alongside all those more mediocre white matriculants.Unearned advantage? What advantage have blacks earned? Why should whites who score better on entrance exams lose their place because someone else is a color that you prefer?
it's racial discrimination, and you support it. You hate that I say it, but it's the truth.
AA is the only way many blacks get into college and on the TV court shows after loaning their students loans to their boyfriends that don't repayEven with affirmative action, whites are more likely to get into their first place schools with below-average test scores, edging out both whites and Blacks who score higher on those tests. Affirmative action means more Blacks with a great combination of personality, unique backgrounds, leadership achievements, academic and extracurricular interests, grades, and test scores are admitted alongside all those more boyfriendsmediocre white matriculants.
Yes. If not for AA the colleges would be almost entirely white, with next to no Black, Latino, Native, or Asian students, not because those other students wouldn’t make the colleges better, but because opportunity would be distributed almost entirely based on race alone.AA is the only way many blacks get into college and on the TV court shows after loaning their students loans to their boyfriends that don't repay
You keep pushing that and it's BS. Harvard and other colleges have been caught discriminating against whites and Asians.Even with affirmative action, whites are more likely to get into their first place schools with below-average test scores, edging out both whites and Blacks who score higher on those tests. Affirmative action means more Blacks with a great combination of personality, unique backgrounds, leadership achievements, academic and extracurricular interests, grades, and test scores are admitted alongside all those more mediocre white matriculants.
What you call “discriminating against whites and Asians” consists of “admitting exceptional students who aren’t white or Asian too.”You keep pushing that and it's BS. Harvard and other colleges have been caught discriminating against whites and Asians.
Your claim is simply another lie.