New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

What the F u d g e

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
No ... saying people who are men aren’t men because they can get pregnant is not looking at them as people. It is treating reproductive potential as superior to personality.
No men can get pregnant
if possible two gay men wouldn't be trying to adopt!
 

Colorforms

Senator
Affirmative action means putting limits on the extent of racial and sex discrimination. Bull Connor opposed affirmative action, like you. Martin Luther King supported it, like me.
Yes, Affirmative action sought to reduce the level of discriminations, not to increase discrimination of other groups.

You don't support racial equality or affirmative action. You support discrimination against unmarginalized groups and you call it affirmative action, but it's just racial discrimination of different races.
 

EatTheRich

President
Yes, Affirmative action sought to reduce the level of discriminations, not to increase discrimination of other groups.

You don't support racial equality or affirmative action. You support discrimination against unmarginalized groups and you call it affirmative action, but it's just racial discrimination of different races.
By “unmarginalized” what you mean is “privileged” and by “discrimination against” you mean “reducing the unearned privilege of.”
 

Colorforms

Senator
By “unmarginalized” what you mean is “privileged” and by “discrimination against” you mean “reducing the unearned privilege of.”
What I mean is that you're okay discriminating against people based on race so long as it's not one of the races considered sacrosanct by fascist lefties
 

EatTheRich

President
What I mean is that you're okay discriminating against people based on race so long as it's not one of the races considered sacrosanct by fascist lefties
A claim you make based on no evidence. Remember that diminishing the amount of discrimination in favor of a group is not the same as discriminating against them.
 

Colorforms

Senator
A claim you make based on no evidence. Remember that diminishing the amount of discrimination in favor of a group is not the same as discriminating against them.
And conversely, discriminating against a racial group that you claim had privilege, is still racial discrimination. Something you have defended on multiple threads.
 

EatTheRich

President
And conversely, discriminating against a racial group that you claim had privilege, is still racial discrimination. Something you have defended on multiple threads.
No, what I’m defending is diminishing the privilege of those who verifiably still have a racial hand up at others’ expense.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Explain how it is “racial discrimination” to place limits on the amount of unearned advantage whites get for being white.
Unearned advantage? What advantage have blacks earned? Why should whites who score better on entrance exams lose their place because someone else is a color that you prefer?

it's racial discrimination, and you support it. You hate that I say it, but it's the truth.
 

EatTheRich

President
Unearned advantage? What advantage have blacks earned? Why should whites who score better on entrance exams lose their place because someone else is a color that you prefer?

it's racial discrimination, and you support it. You hate that I say it, but it's the truth.
Even with affirmative action, whites are more likely to get into their first place schools with below-average test scores, edging out both whites and Blacks who score higher on those tests. Affirmative action means more Blacks with a great combination of personality, unique backgrounds, leadership achievements, academic and extracurricular interests, grades, and test scores are admitted alongside all those more mediocre white matriculants.
 

Dawg

President
Supporting Member
Even with affirmative action, whites are more likely to get into their first place schools with below-average test scores, edging out both whites and Blacks who score higher on those tests. Affirmative action means more Blacks with a great combination of personality, unique backgrounds, leadership achievements, academic and extracurricular interests, grades, and test scores are admitted alongside all those more boyfriendsmediocre white matriculants.
AA is the only way many blacks get into college and on the TV court shows after loaning their students loans to their boyfriends that don't repay
 

EatTheRich

President
AA is the only way many blacks get into college and on the TV court shows after loaning their students loans to their boyfriends that don't repay
Yes. If not for AA the colleges would be almost entirely white, with next to no Black, Latino, Native, or Asian students, not because those other students wouldn’t make the colleges better, but because opportunity would be distributed almost entirely based on race alone.
 

Colorforms

Senator
Even with affirmative action, whites are more likely to get into their first place schools with below-average test scores, edging out both whites and Blacks who score higher on those tests. Affirmative action means more Blacks with a great combination of personality, unique backgrounds, leadership achievements, academic and extracurricular interests, grades, and test scores are admitted alongside all those more mediocre white matriculants.
You keep pushing that and it's BS. Harvard and other colleges have been caught discriminating against whites and Asians.
Your claim is simply another lie.
 
Top