Spamature
President
The subjects of this thread.It would help if you would post NAMES, instead of "his", "he", so we know what/who the hell you're talking about.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
There is 1 him and 1 her.
The subjects of this thread.It would help if you would post NAMES, instead of "his", "he", so we know what/who the hell you're talking about.
I have no idea what you're talking about.
I am only talking about the cop and the victim.In the course of the thread, a NUMBER of people have been mentioned. Duh....
5 murders.If you mean Daunte Wright, then yes, killing him was OK
If you mean Walter Scott, then yes. killing him was OK.
Both cases are justifiable homicide.
Same as Terrence Crutcher, Philando Castille, Daniel Shaver.
He fought with a cop, and tried to grab his gun. Felony in every state in America.What felony had Scott committed?
But other names have ALSO been mentioned in the thread (ex Michael Slager and Walter Scott. Don't be lazy.The subjects of this thread.
There is 1 him and 1 her.
He was not a "victim". He was a criminal, who created his own demise. Justifiable homicide.I am only talking about the cop and the victim.
So ?But other names have ALSO been mentioned in the thread (ex Michael Slager and Walter Scott. Don't be lazy.
There was an offender and that offender's victim, and a trial.He was not a "victim". He was a criminal, who created his own demise. Justifiable homicide.
But they have been discussed, so unless you specify which ones you're talking about, no one has any way of knowing. We don't read minds.So ?
I never discussed those people, and it's your thread.
Potter committed no offense. She carried out normal and perfectly reasonable self-defense, which your liberal teachers were too clueless to ever teach you, which is why you are just as clueless now, as they were.There was an offender and that offender's victim, and a trial.
A trail at which the offender was convicted of killing the victim.
I am supposed to discuss stuff I haven't read anything about and know nothing about ?But they have been discussed, so unless you specify which ones you're talking about, no one has any way of knowing. We don't read minds.
She killed someone.Potter committed no offense. She carried out normal and perfectly reasonable self-defense, which your liberal teachers were too clueless to ever teach you, which is why you are just as clueless now, as they were.
Wright victimized himself, but he was also vicitimized by the liberal schools that neglected to teach him police confrontation behavior.
Yeah. When you post in a thread you should have read the thread - especially when it not very long.I am supposed to discuss stuff I haven't read anything about and know nothing about ?
I understand, that to you, and other liberals having "killed someone" is not necessarily a bad thing.She killed someone.
I understand, that to you, his life didn't matter.
This thread is 150 post long.Yeah. When you post in a thread you should have read the thread - especially when it not very long.
Killing someone is always a bad thing.I understand, that to you, and other liberals having "killed someone" is not necessarily a bad thing.
Liberals have no sense of self-defense, or the concept of justifiable homicide.
If someone was about to hack you to pieces with a machete, you would just stand there and let them do it ? Or you would shoot them?
1. 150 posts is not long. Long posts are those that number over 1,000.This thread is 150 post long.
Unless you posted it to me in a reply, don't expect that I have read it.
I would not expect you to have read every post made to everyone else in other threads, either.
Killing someone is always a bad thing.
Killing that person at that time because of her own negligence
is a very bad thing.
Here is the problem with your argument that you have overlooked.
She meant to taser him, not kill him.
Even she didn't think he was the danger you claim he was, and even she did not think lethal force was necessary or justifiable.
Which is why she intended to use a taser instead of using her gun.
Even Kim Potter herself proves you are wrong.
1. 150 posts is not long. Long posts are those that number over 1,000.
2. Wow! > what a clear cut revelation of liberal ignorance, stupidity, and lunacy. This just goes to show how far out in the fringe liberal thinking actually is.
EARTH TO LIBERALS: not only is killing someone not always a bad thing, in many cases, it is an exceptionally GOOD thing. Literally millions of examples exist.
UPDATED: Civilian shoots, kills man attacking deputy in Florida (leoaffairs.com)
CCW Permit Holder Shoots Accused Robber, Carjacker (ammoland.com)
It is also a good thing for a murderer to be executed. This death penalty eliminates the risk of that killer creating more murder victims, by him/her killing again. Strange how liberals can't comprehend this simple reality.
3. Potter did not intend to use a taser, she carried out normal/proper police procedure by shooting a suspect resisting arrest, hands disappearing from view, and representing a lethal threat, killing was ordinary self-defense, of which cops are cleared from all charges, all the time. I've repeatedly posted a list of named examples. HO HUM.
No I haven't. In fact, the light sentence she got PROVES ME RIGHT. She downplayed the shooting, to reduce the charge. It worked.Expert: Kim Potter was not justified in using deadly force
A use-of-force expert has testified that former Minnesota police officer Kim Potter was not justified in using deadly force when she fatally shot Daunte Wrightabcnews.go.com
Potter, who resigned from the Brooklyn Center police force two days after she shot and killed Wright, has said she meant to pull her Taser instead of her gun
Seriously, you are now trying to call her a liar too ?
Look, there is nothing left to say here.
You've been proven wrong even by Kim Potter herself.
So you're calling her a liar who cheated the justice system with her lies.No I haven't. In fact, the light sentence she got PROVES ME RIGHT. She downplayed the shooting, to reduce the charge. It worked.
If she wasn't working in a blue city (where no cop should ever be), she would have said nothing about a taser, and would not even been charged (like Jeronimo Yanez and Betty Shelby)
Too HEAVILY involved in the Ukraine/Russia issue now, to deal with this anymore.So you're calling her a liar who cheated the justice system with her lies.
No wonder you wingers support her.
You do love and worship your lying cheats.
Deplorable !