Bugsy McGurk
President
This one thinks it’s unconstitutional to selected a black female.As DNC just did with the black female appointed?
Deplorable!
This one thinks it’s unconstitutional to selected a black female.As DNC just did with the black female appointed?
You have need more than allegations from the wild imaginations of right wingers to turn someone into an offender let alone a repeat offender.Ah, so the repeat offenders who are harming and killing innocent people "aren't" violent criminals.
LOL
Read the article. There are "more than allegations from the wild imaginations of right wingers". Crime on the streets is at an all time high. Where do you think that comes from?You have need more than allegations from the wild imaginations of right wingers to turn someone into an offender let alone a repeat offender.
The wild imaginations of right-wingers.Read the article. There are "more than allegations from the wild imaginations of right wingers". Crime on the streets is at an all time High. Where do you think that comes from?
I have to admire your callous dedication to a violent and evil ideology in the face of so much increased death. That kind of irrational belief is worthy of your religion.The wild imaginations of right-wingers.
I created an entire thread on the topic.Right . The Trump cult released the draft of the sc ruling? Please share your evidence.
LIAR and I posted nothing that's in your mental mind........Stacked was subject.......YOU are what creates shooters like the punk at the NY grocery storeThis one thinks it’s unconstitutional to selected a black female.
Deplorable!
re-read thatYou have need more than allegations from the wild imaginations of right wingers to turn someone into an offender let alone a repeat offender.
CambodiaRead the article. There are "more than allegations from the wild imaginations of right wingers". Crime on the streets is at an all time High. Where do you think that comes from?
It’s mostly capitalism destroying “our” institutions … but also the leftist resistance it spawns. That destruction is two-sided … on the one hand it is a sweeping away of an archaic, barbaric , animalistic past … on the other capitalism generally makes no provision to remedy the loss of the relief, however pitiful, these institutions provide from the harshness of nature and unconscious (money-driven) culture.Dems? Cons?
Or is it crazies that seek to destroy everything that doesn't align to boorish group think?
No constitutionally valid law can prohibit protesting government decisions. Hundreds have been charged with arson and looting. Prosecutors mostly let dangerous people back on the street because they are informers helping the state go after its main enemies … labor organizers, leftists, and dissidents. But it also happens because even the formidable machinery of penal repression in this country gets overwhelmed by the sheer number of people who run afoul of the draconian legal system.Right now I think we have people who don't care about our laws and institutions and are willing to see them fall in order to gain power. These prosecutors who keep letting dangerous people back onto the streets, the burning and looting with literally no charges, even these protestors breaking federal laws by trying to influence judicial decisions and not one of them arrested.
It's really a shame that some people care more about their agenda than about the society they were sworn by oath to protect.
Part of the McCarran Act, one of the most notoriously blatantly unconstitutional laws of the Korea-era witch hunt.Title 18, Section 1507, of the U.S. Code. The law states that it is illegal, “with the intent of influencing any judge,” to:
- picket or parade “in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer”
- “or with such intent,” to resort “to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence”
I didn't create the law. I only admonish the people who have lied when they swore to uphold it and are now ignoring it.
All the time. There wouldn’t be all this right-wing terrorism if right-wingers hadn’t been conditioned to believe invented absurdities.Bail reform laws let alleged criminals back on the streets within hours, threatening public security
Hundreds of looters and rioters arrested by the New York Police Department over the past several days have been immediately released due to the state's new bail-reform law that some say is turning the criminal justice process into a mockery and threatening public safety.www.foxnews.com
Right, our "right wing imaginations" are getting people killed.
8th Amendment: “Excessive bail shall not be required.”Where in the constitution does it say that we need to let violent criminals out without bail to attack innocent people.
Why do you hate law abiding people so much that you want to see them harmed or killed?
They still took an oath to defend the Constitution, and will be in blatant violation of it. Many also clearly perjured themselves during their confirmation hearings.Good reminder..
Yes.. pretending the constitution doesn't afford the president the power to choose whom he pleases... Does contribute to the destroying of our institutions..
As does then trying to actually destroy the lives of those selected...
Good catch.
The deep crisis of capitalism in its death throes.Read the article. There are "more than allegations from the wild imaginations of right wingers". Crime on the streets is at an all time High. Where do you think that comes from?
Oh, the irony!I have to admire your callous dedication to a violent and evil ideology in the face of so much increased death. That kind of irrational belief is worthy of your religion.
I can't help you inability to distinguish between -ing and -ed.Except that no one’s life has been destroyed. Which has nothing to do with the institution itself in any event.
So there’s that.
Sure they do.If people lack confidence in the supreme court that is supreme court.
They don't need confidentiality to do there work. If they are embarrassed of Alito's exceptionally bad take then they probably shouldn't have written it.
CoolI created an entire thread on the topic.
Did the SCOTUS leak come from the right ?