So when I say something about the Constitutionality of the lock-down, and you reply with some kind of snarky ignorance thinking you have identified a "conspiracy theory" - what was your point?
This lockdown is unconstitutional, the president has no authority to lock down the nation, he can declare a national emergency, sure, even if it doesn't really constitute a national emergency, that is his decision. But lock down the nation, terminate employment for half of the people that were working? Not legal. And the Governors who gave those orders... just as illegal.
there are about a half dozen major wild cat strikes happening right now... not being covered by the MSM. Whether this social distancing was necessary or not, it sure as hell was not legal. You can play uninformed and ignorant all you want, you can even pretend this lockdown isn't happening, you can post any way you want to, but last time i checked i was responding to your top post asking when the stay at home should have been ordered? So I am directly on topic. Excuse me if my facts are inconvenient to your politics, but they are the facts, this ain't no conspiracy theory. If Trump doesn't end this farce soon, and even if he does, if it doesn't end well (there's no guarantee the economy will start back up again, no nation has ever shut down its entire economy before) ... there will be more strikes, riots, and maybe even revolution.
You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't take away 100 million jobs and not expect a revolution unless you can give them their jobs back and fast.