New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why are lesbians so pro abortion?

reason10

Governor
Doesn't make sense.

1. Lesbians are never going to be in a position to need an abortion. (Yes, ACDC types might, but I'm talking straight ahead Holland Dykes.)

2. Yes, a lesbian can be artificially inseminated. Two dykes want a kid, so they can raise the kid to be a queer. I get that. So why would a lesbian go to all that expense to get pregnant and then do the scrape and suck thing?
 

Colorforms

Senator
Doesn't make sense.

1. Lesbians are never going to be in a position to need an abortion. (Yes, ACDC types might, but I'm talking straight ahead Holland Dykes.)

2. Yes, a lesbian can be artificially inseminated. Two dykes want a kid, so they can raise the kid to be a queer. I get that. So why would a lesbian go to all that expense to get pregnant and then do the scrape and suck thing?
Gay men have to adopt if they want a child. Abortion limits their ability to do that. So you could say that abortion is anti-gay. :)
 

EatTheRich

President
Doesn't make sense.

1. Lesbians are never going to be in a position to need an abortion. (Yes, ACDC types might, but I'm talking straight ahead Holland Dykes.)

2. Yes, a lesbian can be artificially inseminated. Two dykes want a kid, so they can raise the kid to be a queer. I get that. So why would a lesbian go to all that expense to get pregnant and then do the scrape and suck thing?
Well, you have to remember that abortion rights are about whether women are the sexual property of the state. The same principle (that a woman’s body is not her own) that gives rise to abortion restriction also gives rise to rape, which does put Lesbians in the position of needing abortions. Abortion restrictions also mean skyrocketing female poverty, which puts social pressure on all women to form heterosexual relationships as a means of economic security by making women as a sex more economically dependent on men as a sex (by denying them so many opportunities for educational and professional advancement and adding unplanned economic obligations for their children from unplanned pregnancies they are forced to carry to term. There is a snowballing effect where the more women forced into this sort of dependence, the more a strengthened social force of male chauvinism results in all women losing opportunities for advancement and seeing their hours and wages cut. Since they are not in heterosexual marriages, Lesbians are among the most vulnerable women. Being twice discriminated against—as women and as Lesbians—at the least, Lesbians also tend to be more compassionate than for example straight men, all other things being equal, and to respect the human rights of those who are not exactly like them.
 

EatTheRich

President
Gay men have to adopt if they want a child. Abortion limits their ability to do that. So you could say that abortion is anti-gay. :)
There are far more children needing homes than people unable to adopt who want to. Restrictions on gay adoption are far more likely to prevent gay adoption which as a matter of fact harms those children.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
Well, you have to remember that abortion rights are about whether women are the sexual property of the state. The same principle (that a woman’s body is not her own) that gives rise to abortion restriction also gives rise to rape, which does put Lesbians in the position of needing abortions. Abortion restrictions also mean skyrocketing female poverty, which puts social pressure on all women to form heterosexual relationships as a means of economic security by making women as a sex more economically dependent on men as a sex (by denying them so many opportunities for educational and professional advancement and adding unplanned economic obligations for their children from unplanned pregnancies they are forced to carry to term. There is a snowballing effect where the more women forced into this sort of dependence, the more a strengthened social force of male chauvinism results in all women losing opportunities for advancement and seeing their hours and wages cut. Since they are not in heterosexual marriages, Lesbians are among the most vulnerable women. Being twice discriminated against—as women and as Lesbians—at the least, Lesbians also tend to be more compassionate than for example straight men, all other things being equal, and to respect the human rights of those who are not exactly like them.
No abortion rights is about if women are free to murder children in the womb when they can just deal with the consequences of their choices and then put the child up for adoption.
 

EatTheRich

President
No abortion rights is about if women are free to murder children in the womb when they can just deal with the consequences of their choices and then put the child up for adoption.
Fewer than 10% of women denied abortion consider adoption. One big reason for seeking abortion in the first place is knowing you won’t be able to give a child a good life. And putting a child up for adoption is almost guaranteeing a lifetime of abuse and neglect. Pregnancy and childbirth are not trivial things. For example, your risk of dying from being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is an order of magnitude greater than your risk of dying from a legal abortion.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
Fewer than 10% of women denied abortion consider adoption. One big reason for seeking abortion in the first place is knowing you won’t be able to give a child a good life. And putting a child up for adoption is almost guaranteeing a lifetime of abuse and neglect. Pregnancy and childbirth are not trivial things. For example, your risk of dying from being forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term is an order of magnitude greater than your risk of dying from a legal abortion.
So pulling a child apart limb from limb in the womb is better than adoption because you can't give the child a better life. That some evil logic right there.

Women just need to stop screwing around or start using birth control effectively.
 

EatTheRich

President
So pulling a child apart limb from limb in the womb is better than adoption because you can't give the child a better life. That some evil logic right there.

Women just need to stop screwing around or start using birth control effectively.
Removing a potential child with no capacity for sensation by surgical process before it can become a person and suffer is preferable according to some women.
 

God of War

Lets go Brandon!
Removing a potential child with no capacity for sensation by surgical process before it can become a person and suffer is preferable according to some women.
Quite the defense of a Satanic rite you got going there. You have the clear immorality of the typical atheist claimant who says they can formulate moral code that can build civilizations and create amity between mankind.
 

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
So pulling a child apart limb from limb in the womb is better than adoption because you can't give the child a better life. That some evil logic right there.

Women just need to stop screwing around or start using birth control effectively.
but your great people want to BAN birth control too ! lmao
 

sensible don

Governor
Supporting Member
Quite the defense of a Satanic rite you got going there. You have the clear immorality of the typical atheist claimant who says they can formulate moral code that can build civilizations and create amity between mankind.
Should women have the right to ban tobacco or alcohol? you know drunks kill thousands of people every month , amiright?
 

Colorforms

Senator
There are far more children needing homes than people unable to adopt who want to. Restrictions on gay adoption are far more likely to prevent gay adoption which as a matter of fact harms those children.
*cough* bullshit *cough".

The waiting list for adoptions can be as long as 10 years, which is why so many would be parents have to go to other countries to adopt.
 
Top