New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Women should understand that they aren't so much being prohibited from getting an abortion...

EatTheRich

President
Hilarious...."Our doctors, our choice"? What makes them yours?
Sounds pretty authoritarian to me.

Ordering the death of a child to prevent a high school slut from looking fat in a prom dress is even more authoritarian. Some would call it monstrous.

Doctors are not going out and forcing women to have abortions. They are honoring a woman's choice to end a pregnancy. That is the decision to be made by a woman related to her own body. Not by politicians sucking up to right wingers like you.

Abortion techs (since there's no way they could be called doctors, not after this holocaust) get PAID to dismember human beings and suck them into a sink. And they are doing this to a HUMAN BEING, not a woman. It's not her fuckkkkgin body. It's a baby.

Oh, and by the way....what republicans are doing is also outlawing morning after pills that would not involve a doctor to perform an abortion.

Not only is that a flat out LIE, it ignores the history of that pill.
Back in 1980, when that pill was first introduced, a lot of people were opposed because it gave a lot of mothers cervix cancer in later years.
I did a search for the morning after pill and Republicans, and as usual was swamped with a bunch of left wing opinion rags. No reliable source could be found.

In certain red states, abortion is allowed up to six weeks.
That means a slut has SIX WEEKS to decide. One state calls it the HEARTBEAT ACT.

You monsters aren't pro choice. You are PRO ABORTION.

You are DESPICABLE.
Abortion at six weeks means two weeks after the first missed period to decide, get the money together, make 2 appointments (in many of the same states) for mandatory anti-abortion counseling and unnecessary invasive vaginal ultrasounds, and then make another appointment to get the procedure done, in a clinic besieged by anti-abortion terrorists and overflowing with other women desperate to make that two-week window.
 

EatTheRich

President
Reasons women gave for having abortions in the UCSF study (about 2/3 gave more than one reason):

Not financially prepared 40%
Not the right time for a baby 36%
Partner-related reasons 31%
Needs to focus on other children 29%
Interferes with future opportunities 20%
Not emotionally or mentally prepared 19%
Health-related reasons 12%
Wants a better life for the baby than she could provide 12%
Not independent or mature enough for a baby 7%
Influences from family or friends 5%
Doesn’t want a baby or to place baby for adoption 4%
Other 1%
Alcohol, tobacco, or drugs 5% (included in “health-related reasons” above)
 

EatTheRich

President
How is that a forced medical procedure? Contorting speech isn't making your point.

If you commit the crime you do the time. Prison isn't safe either but actions have consequences and you don't get to kill to get out of your consequences.
And here you have it … consensual sex is a “crime” … explains why so much of your agenda (like banning abortions) will inevitably lead to more forced and coerced sex. But even if you accept the premise that consensual sex is a crime, forced pregnancy (literally an enumerated crime against humanity) is cruel and unusual punishment.
 

God of War

Governor
And here you have it … consensual sex is a “crime” … explains why so much of your agenda (like banning abortions) will inevitably lead to more forced and coerced sex. But even if you accept the premise that consensual sex is a crime, forced pregnancy (literally an enumerated crime against humanity) is cruel and unusual punishment.
It's a metaphor. For actions having consequences.


You don't get to murder children you dip shit!
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
The practice of medicine is regulated. Supposed to be. Think of euthanasia. Think of pharmacy (off label treatment). There is a whole field of ethics that regulates medical practice as to what is ethical and not. So this whole "atrocity" claim of yours is just so much emotional claptrap with no basis in medicine.
So your ethics should override anyone else's. That is exactly the problem.
 

God of War

Governor
So your ethics should override anyone else's. That is exactly the problem.
My "ethics" is that your family member shouldn't be allowed to hire a hitman to get rid of you and get the business. Do you object to that? Why do you object to my "ethics" that unborn children can't be murdered? Well, actually my morals and YOUR ethics on the matter. ha ha
 
Last edited:

God of War

Governor
So why don’t you stick to committing metaphorical crimes against humanity rather than the literal ones?
Do you feel I've committed some crime against you? Do you feel injured in debate? Typical leftist impulse. Presumably you'd have my opinion censored, right?
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
My "ethics" is that your family member shouldn't be allowed to hire a hitman to get rid of you and get the business. Do you object to that? Why do you object to my "ethics" that unborn children can't be murdered? Well, actualy my morals and YOUR ethics on the matter. ha ha
You compare an assassination, which nobody disputes would be murder, to terminating a pregnancy, which is clearly debatable.

Your version of morality is not shared by everyone when it comes to abortion....but you insist on forcing it on others.
 

God of War

Governor
You compare an assassination, which nobody disputes would be murder, to terminating a pregnancy, which is clearly debatable.
No, it isn't debatable anymore. It's crystal clear.

Your version of morality is not shared by everyone when it comes to abortion....but you insist on forcing it on others.
How many states have laws since the recent SCOTUS rulling that prohibit to varying degrees abortion? Does your silly butt think I passed those all on my own? No, other people passed them. I'm not imposing anything but the vote of many, many people is. That is how it works Middler.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
No, it isn't debatable anymore. It's crystal clear.


How many states have laws since the recent SCOTUS rulling that prohibit to varying degrees abortion? Does your silly butt think I passed those all on my own? No, other people passed them. I'm not imposing anything but the vote of many, many people is. That is how it works Middler.
Most people are against repeal of Roe. The votes it took to pass those laws were not being cast by voters. They were votes from a handful of people who happen to be in the legislatures of those states.

Now that the republicans had done that we'll see how much support they have in November.
 

God of War

Governor
Most people are against repeal of Roe. The votes it took to pass those laws were not being cast by voters. They were votes from a handful of people who happen to be in the legislatures of those states.

Now that the republicans had done that we'll see how much support they have in November.
That kind of reasoning cuts both ways but YOU never accept it. ha ha That's called hypocrisy.
 

God of War

Governor
Right, leaving women only option but the clothes hanger abortion is not something to be proud of.
That's okay pregnancy out of wed lock is not the humiliation it once was. So the clothes hanger option will not be the option chosen. Adoption will be the viable option. That and prevention.

Also... you don't own the doctors.
Actually, you miss the forest for the trees because you surely don't either. We are talking about whether our medical system has the room to participate in the mass slaughter of patients. They don't anymore.
 
That's okay pregnancy out of wed lock is not the humiliation it once was. So the clothes hanger option will not be the option chosen. Adoption will be the viable option. That and prevention.


Actually, you miss the forest for the trees because you surely don't either. We are talking about whether our medical system has the room to participate in the mass slaughter of patients. They don't anymore.
Out of wedlock pregnancy is not the only reason people choose to get abortions.
 
That was the big deal then that got 7 old men feeling sorry for the 2 dumb young women lawyers arguing roe.
Roe vs. Wade had far larger implications than just one instance of abortion.
It gave people the right to decide what happens in their body.
Now ya Boi, Mullah Alito is gonna force you get the shot next.
 

EatTheRich

President
Do you feel I've committed some crime against you? Do you feel injured in debate? Typical leftist impulse. Presumably you'd have my opinion censored, right?
By a socialist government? You bet. There is nothing to be gained from entertaining the “opinion” that women should be bred like livestock.
 
Top