Drumcollie
* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Did you read? The article clearly writes at a level unknown to the poster. It's copy and paste fantasizing with no link to source cuz it's a discredited source already.Fantasizing again?
Did you read? The article clearly writes at a level unknown to the poster. It's copy and paste fantasizing with no link to source cuz it's a discredited source already.Fantasizing again?
So you have no facts, no verifiable sources and toss out a claim that I don't in response to a post with facts and a verifiable source.I bet you do. It's like 95 percent of the time for you.
I gave you a source. Has anyone come forward to say the letter was forged? Nope.Did you read? The article clearly writes at a level unknown to the poster. It's copy and paste fantasizing with no link to source cuz it's a discredited source already.
Why do you think Biden has to do anything? It would be a matter for the DOJ.Even if he did. What could Biden* do?
A discredited source? Like One America News or Russia Today or Tyler Durden and anything on ZeroHedge?Did you read? The article clearly writes at a level unknown to the poster. It's copy and paste fantasizing with no link to source cuz it's a discredited source already.
Funny position to take given your standard for investigating the stolen election.Really? An investigation is the same as a prosecution?
But this is congress doing the investigating not a law enforcement agency. Didn't Peluda do it for the impeachment. Why did they prosecute Trump and THEN investigate.An impeachment is not a criminal trial...so no, there is no double jeopardy.
You aren't ashamed of Obama calling back the Benghazi rescue operation 2 or 3 times?There were 8 investigations into Benghazi. You aren't ashamed of that?
Honestly, this entire response of yours couldn't be more pathetic.The impeachment was entirely about Trump inciting insurrection. Republicans refused to convict. Some because they were too loyal to the republican party or they feared Trump...some because they said it was too late, Trump was already leaving office. All bullshit excuses. Why were there no witnesses as to Trump's involvement in planning the rally or in his communication with the leaders of the riot?
You keep ignoring the number of audits and recounts that have already been done. How many more do you want? The GOP in AZ says they need another even after that crack group of Cyber Sphincters failed to find anything at all.Funny position to take given your standard for investigating the stolen election.
But this is congress doing the investigating not a law enforcement agency. Didn't Peluda do it for the impeachment. Why did they prosecute Trump and THEN investigate.Sounds like what a bunch of thumb sucker [english slang for cigarettes] would do, and like you, approve of.
You aren't ashamed of Obama calling back the Benghazi rescue operation 2 or 3 times?
Report: U.S. Rescue Team Was on its Way to Benghazi, But Was Turned Back
The commander-in-chief needed his beauty sleep.pjmedia.com
Honestly, this entire response of yours couldn't be more pathetic.
Did you read the article?A discredited source? Like One America News or Russia Today or Tyler Durden and anything on ZeroHedge?
Here is Eastman's current employer defending the memo...not denying he wrote it.
John Eastman’s Employer Defends Blueprint For Pence To Steal Election For Trump
MSN
www.msn.com
How was it misrepresented? Nobody claimed Eastman asked Pence to decertify electors. This is also from that article.Did you read the article?
"Claremont Institute Senior Fellow John Eastman, acting as counsel to the President of the United States at a critical stage during the 2020 elections in December 2020 and January 2021, offered legal advice that has since been maliciously misrepresented and distorted by major media outlets."
Was Eastman Pence's lawyer?Futhermore, because it was legal advice, it will fall under the priveledge of Attorney/Client confidentiality. Whomever released that memo should be prosecuted.
Eastman's memo was distributed to people other than just Trump.Futhermore, because it was legal advice, it will fall under the priveledge of Attorney/Client confidentiality. Whomever released that memo should be prosecuted.
I'm not ignoring what you call audits. I simply don't trust those auditors as I've told you at least twice. They're morely likely to destroy the evidence of wrong doing than to expose their malfeseance or complicity.You keep ignoring the number of audits and recounts that have already been done. How many more do you want? The GOP in AZ says they need another even after that crack group of Cyber Sphincters failed to find anything at all.
The impeachment could not have resulted in jail time for Trump, so no...it was not a prosecution.
A team of security people was flown from Tripoli to Benghazi. Nobody else was close enough to be of help. How does that have anything at all to do with the 8 congressional investigations?
And why would anyone trust the likes of Logan and the Cyber Ninjas?I'm not ignoring what you call audits. I simply don't trust those auditors as I've told you at least twice. They're morely likely to destroy the evidence of wrong doing than to expose their malfeseance or complicity.
You really have an anal retentive problem with your constant appeals to cyber sphincters and this isn't the first time you've displayed such retentive behavior (I'm talking about a recent prior post of yours).And why would anyone trust the likes of Logan and the Cyber Ninjas?
The companies doing audits were not involved in the election. They are certified auditors and their reputations are the bedrock of their businesses.
They'd have little to gain and everything to lose.
Well, why is it such a mystery and no one has yet been able to explain what Trump was doing during those three hours of "hugging and kissing by all those lovable people" as the mob scene was described by Trump during the attempted coup?
Maybe he was taking a dump. Who cares? He was not there. He didn't tell people to go break into the Capitol. There was no coup or insurrection.Well, why is it such a mystery and no one has yet been able to explain what Trump was doing during those three hours of "hugging and kissing by all those lovable people" as the mob scene was described by Trump during the attempted coup?
taking a dump on the constitution.Maybe he was taking a dump. Who cares? He was not there. He didn't tell people to go break into the Capitol. There was no coup or insurrection.
I care, all of us should care. Trump can explain it for us maybe... if he's subpoenaed.Maybe he was taking a dump. Who cares? He was not there. He didn't tell people to go break into the Capitol. There was no coup or insurrection.
So who would you trust if not independent auditors?I'm not ignoring what you call audits. I simply don't trust those auditors as I've told you at least twice. They're morely likely to destroy the evidence of wrong doing than to expose their malfeseance or complicity.