When Obama was elected, it became HIS job to re-assess the entire situation, and to re-negotiate the deal if the situation warranted.That "wise man" got precisely what he wanted to supposedly avoid a complete Iraq meltdown - the surge and his extended troop withdrawal deal with Iraq.
And then Iraq melted down anyway.
Leading GOP cultists to blame....Obama!
;-)
He was too busy making 8 years worth of Tee times.When Obama was elected, it became HIS job to re-assess the entire situation, and to re-negotiate the deal if the situation warranted.
Did he?
Of course. You saw his speech last night.When Obama was elected, it became HIS job to re-assess the entire situation, and to re-negotiate the deal if the situation warranted.
Did he?
ROTFLMAO! We're talking about re-negotiating our withdrawal from Iraq, and you babble about... what, exactly? Obama's failure to do so, and as a result yes, Iraq has completely melted down.Of course. You saw his speech last night.
Iraq has completely melted down, just like opponents of GWB's war knew it would.
I simply answered your question.ROTFLMAO! We're talking about re-negotiating our withdrawal from Iraq, and you babble about... what, exactly? Obama's failure to do so, and as a result yes, Iraq has completely melted down.
mmm, because Barry is the president? Or maybe because Iraq is his responsibility? Or maybe because Barry was warned about what a screw up like pulling out too soon could do? Or maybe because he cares enough about the US and the military as to not waste their blood and sacrifice?I simply answered your question.
But why do you now claim that Obama should have renegotiated GWB's deal and kept our troops there? You Pugs thought that Iraq was then a wonderful place - a victory for GWB. Vindication. Suicide bombings were just frequent, not constant. You didn't call for keeping more US troops there back then, and you don't even want them there now. So how do you justify your Monday morning quarterbacking asserting that Obama should have overidden the GWB deal and kept our troops there past the deadline GWB agreed to?
I have ALWAYS said a complete withdrawal of our troops will lead to a resurgence of al quaeda. No different from what will happen in Afghanistan, once we leave there.I simply answered your question.
But why do you now claim that Obama should have renegotiated GWB's deal and kept our troops there? You Pugs thought that Iraq was then a wonderful place - a victory for GWB. Vindication. Suicide bombings were just frequent, not constant. You didn't call for keeping more US troops there back then, and you don't even want them there now. So how do you justify your Monday morning quarterbacking asserting that Obama should have overidden the GWB deal and kept our troops there past the deadline GWB agreed to?
Again, pure revisionism.mmm, because Barry is the president? Or maybe because Iraq is his responsibility? Or maybe because Barry was warned about what a screw up like pulling out too soon could do? Or maybe because he cares enough about the US and the military as to not waste their blood and sacrifice?
You pick one.
Jeez, then you must have harshly castigated GWB for his troop withdrawal agreement, and insisted that we keep the peace in Iraq with our troops forever.I have ALWAYS said a complete withdrawal of our troops will lead to a resurgence of al quaeda. No different from what will happen in Afghanistan, once we leave there.
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out.
I have always felt that the situation is fluid, NOTHING IS WRITTEN IN STONE, and if it needs to be re-negotiated, so be it.Jeez, then you must have harshly castigated GWB for his troop withdrawal agreement, and insisted that we keep the peace in Iraq with our troops forever.
Right?
;-)
Wow. That sounds like harsh criticism of GWB for his troop withdrawal agreement, which had hard deadlines in it.I have always felt that the situation is fluid, NOTHING IS WRITTEN IN STONE, and if it needs to be re-negotiated, so be it.
Instead, we not only withdrew, we told them exactly WHEN we would do so... if I were a terrorist, what would I be thinking? There's only ONE possible answer to THAT question...
Figure it out.
Excuse me, who was it that was so proud that he was pulling the troops out of a "stable and self sufficient Iraq"? Please don't tell me that was the GOP.Again, pure revisionism.
You say he was warned about pulling out our troops.
GWB got the surge he wanted. He got the troop withdrawal agreement he wanted. That agreement lapsed in 2011. When it lapsed, you Pugs were painting the picture of a wonderful GWB victory in Iraq. Complete vindication. Everything wonderful.
There was no GOP clamor for keeping our troops there. The contrary was true. And now you pretend that Obama was "warned" that honoring GWB's agreement and ending our combat role in Iraq would lead to the complete Iraq meltdown. Pure hooey - nothing but a desperate attempt by Pugs to blame the consequences of GWB's disastrous Iraq war on Obama.
Hey, lots of people fooled themselves into thinking Iraq was stabilizing, which is why no one back then was clamoring to keep our troops in Iraq. It's only long after the fact that Pugs screech that Obama should have left our troops there (even without immunity from Iraqi prosecution), even though Pugs say they don't want our troops there now.Excuse me, who was it that was so proud that he was pulling the troops out of a "stable and self sufficient Iraq"? Please don't tell me that was the GOP.
Barry had the intel, did the assessment (by his own words) and decided to pull the troops and leave Iraq to it's own devices. He was warned what that would do, he did it anyway.
Bush was gone for 3 years before Barry, the supposed president of the United States, pulled the troops without opting for negotiating a status of forces agreement.
So you're saying that even Barry isn't immune to Barry's lies.Hey, lots of people fooled themselves into thinking Iraq was stabilizing, which is why no one back then was clamoring to keep our troops in Iraq. It's only long after the fact that Pugs screech that Obama should have left our troops there (even without immunity from Iraqi prosecution), even though Pugs say they don't want our troops there now.
Completely incoherent GOP hackery that no one can explain or justify.
Huh? What "lie" are you babbling about?So you're saying that even Barry isn't immune to Barry's lies.
We finally agree on something.
Conceding right away, I see.Huh? What "lie" are you babbling about?
And respond to what I actually said, if at all possible.
Don't waste your time on this mindless Internet drone. There is no there there. It's simply a party shill husk.So you're saying that even Barry isn't immune to Barry's lies.
We finally agree on something.
So true.Don't waste your time on this mindless Internet drone. There is no there there. It's simply a party shill husk.