New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Rick Perry indictment

Colorforms

Senator
Judge Jeanine Pirro spent the first five minutes of her show utterly demolishing the politicized indictment of Texas Governor Rick Perry.
Make no mistake............it was a stupid political move similar to the claim that Romney caused the cancer death of a woman in Massachusetts.

Democrat Reputation Slashing machine is up and working.


Well, the Walker indictmwnt turned out not only to be complete BS, but now the prosecutors who filed the indictment are under scrutiny for their corruption of it
 

Colorforms

Senator
It was purely political.
That's what Democrats do.
They try to destroy anyone that disagrees with them.
Utterly destroy.
Frankly, that reeks of pure evil.
Could not have said it better myself. Conform or be destroyed. So many societies were eroded from within with this kind of philosophy. Germany, pre WW2, during the Nazi build up comes to mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jen

Jen

Senator
Yep. Dems must look at Perry as a threat... the witchhunt is on.
Yup.
They slash and burn anyone who threatens them.
Perry has already demonstrated that he is a stronger leader than Obama could hope to be. You don't see the tantrums with Perry. He may not have been star-quality last time and he may not be a celebrity-type this time. But he seems to have far more substance than the limp-noodle-wristed political whores that the Democrats have to offer.
 

Jen

Senator
I'm not even a fan of Rick Perry and we are laughing at this here (in Texas) because it's going to have a reverse effect (he will probably gain popularity for being attacked like that).

Besides...if anyone should have a grand jury issue an indictment against them it's Barack Hussein Obama.

;)
I am not/was not a Perry fan either, but he has certainly risen in my estimation at this point. He is more manly than Obama could ever hope to be.


 

Mr. Friscus

Governor
WOW.

When David Axelrod calls it "pretty sketchy", you know it was just a political move.

You know, the type that Democrats have accused the GOP congress of, nonstop, for at least four years.

Meanwhile, the person who Perry "acted against", The chief Law Enforcement officer here in the indictment, was arrested for drunk driving. She blew 3 times the legal limit. She was combative and needed to be strapped down.

There's also a ton of history of indictments that are way out there and immediately overturned in this court against Republicans.

I'm no Rick Perry guy, but this one is hard for Democrats to stand behind.
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
You expect something different from Pirro?
Stupid, irresponsible, wrong, idiotic...but is the democratic ever going to do anything smart? Nope and this is another fine example of the democratic wasting out time and tax dollars.
 

Drumcollie

* See DC's list of Kook posters*
Perry is a piece of shit...Hopefully he'll do jail time...Funny to watch him squirm
Hay Mr racist with low self esteem...tell you drunk ass democratic women to just quit driving drunk....she is an embarrassment...just like yuou are to the democratic party...bad enough you guys supported slavery and segregation and voted against civil rights...better you go fake some audio and video.
 

Spamature

President
I am not/was not a Perry fan either, but he has certainly risen in my estimation at this point. He is more manly than Obama could ever hope to be.


Judge Jeanine Pirro spent the first five minutes of her show utterly demolishing the politicized indictment of Texas Governor Rick Perry.
Make no mistake............it was a stupid political move similar to the claim that Romney caused the cancer death of a woman in Massachusetts.

Democrat Reputation Slashing machine is up and working.

So if Obama stated publicly that he wanted to dismantle the congressional republican's ability to investigate his administration. And in conjunction with that desire Obama said that unless Tray Gowdy resigned his seat in congress that he was going to veto any bill containing funding for congressional investigations. Gowdy stood up to him and refused to resign. Then Obama makes good on his threat. You would say that's a perfectly fine use of his power as president and everything is on the up and up ? You believe there is no illegality in an individual trying to force an elected official out of office by use of the power of their office ?
 
Last edited:

Saladin2

Senator
Supporting Member
Rick Perry is a piece of shit...He needs to start hiring lawyers to defend himself....NO chance of a Presidential run...What a loser
 

Marcus Aurelius

Governor
Supporting Member
WOW.

When David Axelrod calls it "pretty sketchy", you know it was just a political move....
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/16/david-axelrod-defends-rick-perry-calls-indictment-/
“Unless he was demonstrably trying to scrap the ethics unit for other than his stated reason, Perry indictment seems pretty sketchy,” Mr. Axelrod tweeted.
Other Democrats have spoken out on Twitter to defend the rumored 2016 presidential contender.

Politico’s chief economic correspondent Ben White tweeted, “It seems quite perverse to indict a governor for exercising his clearly delineated constitutional authority.”
 

gigi

Mayor
So if Obama stated publicly that he wanted to dismantle the congressional republican's ability to investigate his administration. And in conjunction with that desire Obama said that unless Tray Gowdy resigned his seat in congress that he was going to veto any bill containing funding for congressional investigations. Gowdy stood up to him and refused to resign. Then Obama makes good on his threat. You would say that's a perfectly fine use of his power as president and everything is on the up and up ? You believe there is no illegality in an individual trying to force an elected official out of office by use of the power of their office ?
Not at all. But let's bring the comparison closer to home. Let's say that Obama refused to fund an ethics organization run by someone who proved herself to be not only incapacitated and ill, but completely unethical as well. Let's figure that Obama assumed that someone like that could not possibly fill the responsibilities of her office and would therefore create waste and mismanagement of The People's funds that would be applied to her office. So Obama says....she's got to resign so we can get on with the work of this agency. And she refuses. So now Obama is left with a dilemma: Either fund the org and take a chance on whether this woman who can't seem to keep sober long enough to drive home can actually run such an important organization, or tell them....no money til the CRIMINAL is off the board.
Yeaah, I would support Obama's choice to veto that.


Speaking of "vetoes".....this is interesting, only because the left is trying to hard to pitch a bitch over Perry's refusal to support the funding. Last year or the year before, Texas said they would not give state funds to Planned Parenthood. Immediately, Obama said then suck it (I'm paraphrasing here) No federal funds to Texas for state medicaid until Texas caved on the PP thing. Not only that, but PP, who already had the current year's funding, began, the next day, refusing to treat women or fill their prescriptions....even though they already had the meds in house and the current year's money in the bank.
And nobody indicted Obama.
And the left didn't say anything about the abuse of power from Obama, or PP, or a word about all those needing, low income women they say urgently need PP.
 
Top