New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why the "Trump's a Racist" Narrative Doesn't Hold Any Credibility

EatTheRich

President
Cool. Maybe someone at the funeral of the American citizens killed in El Paso can get up and talk about how illegal immigration caused their murders. You are one sick, disgusting left winger. There is no reason to respond to your evil.
The racism that killed people in El Paso wasn’t caused by anything brown people did. Antipathy against cops was caused solely by police actions.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
Poor whites above the poverty line .

Poor Blacks Living where majority is poor. Where whites are more likely to commit crime?

What on earth are you smoking. Makes zero sense.

It's the lies needed to keep their asinine and fact-less conspiracies afloat. Really a sign of a very low IQ.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
It’s a simple decduction.
1. The gaps between whites and Blacks in every aspect of life (for example the high-paying jobs that as @Dawg puts out are largely unavailable to Blacks, especially the minority of Blacks living in the inner city) are well established.
2. Race has no meaning independent of the social meaning we give it but is simply a system of “othering” set up to provide one group with opportunity at the expense of another.
3. Therefore the racial distribution of opportunity is in and of itself proof of systemic racism.
1. Okay
2. P.C. garbage in defiance of incontrovertible genetic research results and common sense and the simple reality before everyone's eyes.
3. Philosophy 101 teaches otherwise. Disparate results -- your point #1 -- don't prove disparate opportunity. The existence of x doesn't prove the existence of y unless y is the only possible cause of x; "systemic racism" is not the only possible cause of extant gaps between Whites and blacks. If x ("racism") acts on a, b, c, d, and e (such as blacks, Orientals, jews, Arabs, Hispanics) and a reacts differently than the others, there must be something distinct inherent to a. If a given quantity of X ("systemic racism") produces a given quantity of Y (such as black crime rates) then a reduction in the quantity of X (undeniable reduction in racist attitudes + legal mechanisms to diminish race-based practice) will gradually cause a reduction in Y, which hasn't happened. Asserting that, because x would produce y and y exists, x must exist is fundamentally fallacious.

Did you read the 2nd article I linked? It's quite objective & even-handed.

Except that it doesn't indicate any such thing. Dirt poor whites commit less crime than poor blacks. Rich blacks commit more crime than rich whites. Once again, you have a statistics problem on your side. You are still unable, as a mentally ill left winger, to process the fact that people CHOOSE to commit crimes. You are unable to admit that blacks commit higher rates of crime regardless of economic conditions. These are left wing racist philosophies. I don't want to hear anymore garble about how these criminals had no choice or how these statistics don't exist. That is worst of racism.
It's always about the narrative that advances the agenda, never about objective facts. If objective facts and the conclusions to which they inevitably lead were the only considerations, "racism" wouldn't even be a thing
 

Mick

The Right is always right
The racism that killed people in El Paso wasn’t caused by anything brown people did. Antipathy against cops was caused solely by police actions.
LOL. So racist cops justify murdering cops and deriding them at their own funerals is not only okay...but SHOULD happen........but the same is not true for illegals aliens motivating murder of those perceived as illegal aliens. You are one bizarre, nutty person.
 

Drumcollie

Ending Racism with or without Hillary
My explanation is racism. The alternative explanation favored by racist conservatives is Black inferiority.
They would be left wing conservative as Republicans were formed on the basis that all are equal and still believe this. Unlike you because your arguments demand inequality to exist so you can complain.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
$12.50 an hour is a starvation wage particularly for someone trying to support a family. Also, even if you were hiring 50 people, there are nearly 2 million unemployed Black youth in the U.S.

Maybe this kid did get addicted to alcohol as a result of the hand life dealt him. I’ve never heard of anyone stealing to support a weed habit. If you don’t have new clothes you can’t get a job.
Really? Kids want to hang out, not work. They have clothes, but they want Nike Jordans.
New clothes do not keep people from applying at a fast food place....and most of our employees are college students, not the head of a household.

I'm telling you that if you want a job, there are jobs to be had.
 

Emily

NSDAP Kanzler
What is your explanation why Blacks commit crimes at higher rates? Good luck coming up with one that isn’t racist,
Any explanation for different outcomes among the races other than "racism" will always be deemed "racist" -- you set a trap.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
So you think your ilk believe an innocent man should be sent to trial? Wow. I know you were desperate to support the low IQ and gullibility of your electorate but what you are suggesting is sheer evil. They know it never happened....but they want him prosecuted anyway. It is mentally sick.
1. I think people realized a grand jury is secret and thought it would be best if the testimony were public. Evil? Really? The fact is that Brown was a good 20ft away. Some people may have felt Wilson had other options and should not have killed an unarmed man.
2. There was conflicting information and no decisive evidence either way.

I happen to believe Wilson, but that is not based on indisputable evidence. It is a judgement call.
 

EatTheRich

President
1. Okay
2. P.C. garbage in defiance of incontrovertible genetic research results and common sense and the simple reality before everyone's eyes.
3. Philosophy 101 teaches otherwise. Disparate results -- your point #1 -- don't prove disparate opportunity. The existence of x doesn't prove the existence of y unless y is the only possible cause of x; "systemic racism" is not the only possible cause of extant gaps between Whites and blacks. If x ("racism") acts on a, b, c, d, and e (such as blacks, Orientals, jews, Arabs, Hispanics) and a reacts differently than the others, there must be something distinct inherent to a. If a given quantity of X ("systemic racism") produces a given quantity of Y (such as black crime rates) then a reduction in the quantity of X (undeniable reduction in racist attitudes + legal mechanisms to diminish race-based practice) will gradually cause a reduction in Y, which hasn't happened. Asserting that, because x would produce y and y exists, x must exist is fundamentally fallacious.

Did you read the 2nd article I linked? It's quite objective & even-handed.


It's always about the narrative that advances the agenda, never about objective facts. If objective facts and the conclusions to which they inevitably lead were the only considerations, "racism" wouldn't even be a thing
What genetics actually show is that race is not a reliable proxy for common ancestry or genetic endowment.

What history actually shows is that when discrimination has been reduced, the gaps between whites and Blacks have decreased. The specific mechanisms of racism (discrimination for example) operate differently with respect to Blacks, Jews, Asians, etc.

The assertion is that racism is a possible cause of racial inequality, and there is no other possible cause because there is no such thing as race aside from systems of advantage and disadvantage.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Same poll I linked, buffoon. Try reading your material before you post, fool. It says only 8% of Republicans feel Donald Trump is racist. Do you lie for the sake of lying or do you just have a really low IQ? More than likely it's both.
So 8% of republicans, something like 40% independents and 60% of democrats...as I said..
That is people on the left, independents and people on the right.

So the fact is that people on all sides think Trump is a racist.
 

EatTheRich

President
LOL. So racist cops justify murdering cops and deriding them at their own funerals is not only okay...but SHOULD happen........but the same is not true for illegals aliens motivating murder of those perceived as illegal aliens. You are one bizarre, nutty person.
I never said and do not believe the killing of those cops was justified,Professor Strawman. But it is a foreseeable consequence of the law that cops must use violence to uphold a brutal racist system. Obama was pointing out that reforms would result in fewer killings of cops for the same reasons in the future.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
John McCain was a SENATOR you moron. Not a simple Congressman. There are filibuster rules in the Senate. Dems promised to use the filibuster to block any attempt to reform the GSEs because they claimed doing so was really sinister and racist.
Here is what I wrote:

The regulations proposed by McCain in the senate were not blocked by anyone. The republicans had the majority. You claim democrats in the House blocked the legislation...tell me how.

Your reading comprehension sucks. Who in the senate promised a filibuster?
 

EatTheRich

President
They would be left wing conservative as Republicans were formed on the basis that all are equal and still believe this. Unlike you because your arguments demand inequality to exist so you can complain.
You are hopelessly mixed up. The Republican Party was founded by people who pointed out and loudly complained about a particular racial injustice, slavery. They did not say “all people are equal so no one should ever talk about how slavery treats people unequally.”
 

Mick

The Right is always right
1. I think people realized a grand jury is secret and thought it would be best if the testimony were public. Evil? Really? The fact is that Brown was a good 20ft away. Some people may have felt Wilson had other options and should not have killed an unarmed man.
2. There was conflicting information and no decisive evidence either way.

I happen to believe Wilson, but that is not based on indisputable evidence. It is a judgement call.

The evidence is indisputable and that was made clear by Obama's DOJ. Of course, they never dared to actually say it publicly, they preferred the riots and lies continue....and your part of the electorate to continue to be duped. They just stuffed in the middle of a 200 page report. There was no evidence whatsoever that Micheal Brown was murdered. Yet, two of your Presidential candidates claimed he was just days ago. Is this pure evil in order to try to benefit electorally or is low IQs by these individuals? And you wonder why your electorate looks so idiotic when it comes to facts and evidence and conspiracies.
 

EatTheRich

President
Really? Kids want to hang out, not work. They have clothes, but they want Nike Jordans.
New clothes do not keep people from applying at a fast food place....and most of our employees are college students, not the head of a household.

I'm telling you that if you want a job, there are jobs to be had.
19% unemployment (for Black youth) says otherwise.
 

EatTheRich

President
Any explanation for different outcomes among the races other than "racism" will always be deemed "racist" -- you set a trap.
Because any other explanation is racist. Either the different outcomes reflect different opportunities, or they reflect one race’s superiority.
 

Mick

The Right is always right
So 8% of republicans, something like 40% independents and 60% of democrats...as I said..
That is people on the left, independents and people on the right.

So the fact is that people on all sides think Trump is a racist.

Yeah, if you use an 8% statistics to say "people on the right" then it's safe to say America believes the Earth is flat. Good lord, dunce, just admit you're an idiot and didn't read the poll. Doubling down and claiming 8% is something to brag about is sheer insanity. You are wrong. Just admit it for once. Lulz
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
That's how highlights....and lowlights work in news programs, clown. Try watching SportsCenter. They'll show things in repetitive loops every single day. It is done to make sure people get the point of the play. No one actually thinks the same exact thing happened 5 times. Unless of course you are low IQ left winger. Then God only knows how your brain works. Face it, the claim that it was "doctored" was another one of your left wing lies.
You said it wasn't doctored...clearly it was. Otherwise the video would have been exactly what those present happened to see. Yes, it was a way to reinforce what they wanted to emphasize. First you say it didn't happen then you agree it did, but for a good reason.
 

middleview

President
Supporting Member
Nope. You are peddling backwards now. That was not YOURS nor the original left wing lie. Originally you floated a pic around of the name covered and claimed Trump did it. The pic was not from the day he visited the POTUS never made the request. When exposed as left wing liars you just changed it to "someone somewhere may have asked something but nothing ever happened.....please stop talking about it". LMFAO
Find the post of mine claiming Trump issued that order. I won't expect that you will, because you can't. I posted the link to the Navy saying "yes, the White House asked us to move the ship or cover the name".....Are you now saying the Navy is a bunch of left wing liars?
 
Top