09/11 changed everything

[Days]

Before 09/11 our nation was still thinking carbon based thoughts, we listened to authority, we made sure things were "official" or we rejected them... and it was a big deal if something was rejected! I remember at the age of 14, when Richard Milhouse Nixon resigned from the oval office, I asked my dad "why is the president resigning?" ... and his answer was, "he lied to us". What a strange answer. But in those days, Americans believed their government, and it was a huge crime to tell a lie. On 09/11/2001 that all changed.

Enter the digital revolution. We no longer believe authority, we no longer believe the media, it isn't "accept but verify" - it is more like "find out how they are lying"... because you can damn sure count on it, they ALWAYS lie. This is the new paradigm. We rifled through a thousand lies made to cover up the real culprits behind 09/11. We got attacked just for investigating; we were labeled "conspiracy theorists" and "anti-Semites" and we were cussed out and condemned and banned from posting. Evidence was taken down over and over... authority did not want the truth to come out. (Because the truth is, 09/11 was done by the Mossad) But we kept on fighting for the truth and a new paradigm began to take shape; digital based thinking, a whole new way of reasoning. And a whole new generation was raised ... to not trust authority.

The irony of this paradigm shift to digital based thought is that the basic argument of 09/11 is a carbon based argument. Good old mechanical engineering is needed to grasp what happened. The old authority was turned on its head. This was exceedingly evil. Simple physics were no longer reliable arguments. Buildings can fall down for no reason, steel superstructure can fail without the superstructure being demolished, all the rudiments of old logic was no longer important. Steel that was cold enough to grab with your bare hands and hold onto, was also hot enough to fail from intense heat. Fire burned up, but the heat went down. Explosions that happened everywhere were not proof of explosives. Discovery of traces of nano explosives in the ash was not proof of traces of nano explosives in the ash. In short, everything was denied. The entire history of fire prevention was no longer valid argument; all logic, all history, all science, anything known to mankind was no longer valid argument... in the new paradigm, stupid-speak reigned supreme, while intelligence was deemed inferior.

Now, I understand it was a psy-op... I understand that the forces behind it are not interested in the advancement of mankind... they have their marching orders and that's what they do. But the damage done to the human intellect is horrific. Human intelligence has been rendered inoperative. Intelligence itself is no longer a function of the human brain, it is a security apparatus of the state. The central intelligence found it necessary to attack and destroy individual intelligence. All hail the new intelligence! It is no longer an intelligent intelligence.

Gone are the days when you can point out simple truths. Simple truth is utterly rejected. Propaganda rules the day. Truth has no place in the new paradigm. Facts are befuddled by disinformation. Seeing is allowed, believing is not. It is a brave new digital world. Human logic doesn't have a place in the cyber reality. When someone online demands you to prove something... there is no way to prove anything online. Everything is questioned, nothing is allowed. When it got so bad that I wasn't allowed to say "heat rises" - I knew I was in trouble. In the new paradigm of digital think, water is no longer wet. Everything is an illusion. Nothing is real. You can't prove out real world ideas in the land of illusion. See those people hanging to the steel in the impact gashes of the World Trade Center? Will you admit that the steel has cooled? Nope. No reason to admit that the steel has cooled, just because humans have wrapped themselves around the steel with their bare hands and arms.

That crazy old way of thinking is gone. Back when men were men and women were women. Welcome to the world of intersex. What the hell is that, you ask? It is digital think. You can't be sure of anything.

This is scarier than it sounds.

 

[Jen]

There was a huge push to defy authority back in the 1960's. Police were called "pigs" just like they are now.
This crapola has been going on for a very long time.

 

[Days]

There was a huge push to defy authority back in the 1960's. Police were called "pigs" just like they are now.
This crapola has been going on for a very long time.

Yeah, but logic was still logic.

not anymore. Use logic these days and you aren't being logical.

 

[Emily]

Jen's right, though, that it goes back a long ways before 9/11.
That they were able to convince people of the impossible re: 9/11 -- all the kinds of things Days said in the top post -- did change things, was a turning point for psy-ops. It started long before, though.
JFK's assassination was an op, with the official story full of the proverbial holes big enough to drive a truck through. Most people accept the official story, though, or don't care about looking any deeper, while those who notice the holes are "conspiracy nuts."
Lincoln's assassination was an op. Garfield and McKinley, too. Zachary Taylor didn't really die from eating too many cherries.
And that's just America, and just Presidents being removed.
Question the official lies and your nuts.

High gear and a new paradigm since 9/11, though, yes. Days is absolutely right. Heat doesn't rise even though it does, the collapse of building 7 wasn't reported before it happened even though you saw it, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Wonderful post.

 

[Days]

Jen's right, though, that it goes back a long ways before 9/11.
That they were able to convince people of the impossible re: 9/11 -- all the kinds of things Days said in the top post -- did change things, was a turning point for psy-ops. It started long before, though.
JFK's assassination was an op, with the official story full of the proverbial holes big enough to drive a truck through. Most people accept the official story, though, or don't care about looking any deeper, while those who notice the holes are "conspiracy nuts."
Lincoln's assassination was an op. Garfield and McKinley, too. Zachary Taylor didn't really die from eating too many cherries.
And that's just America, and just Presidents being removed.
Question the official lies and your nuts.

High gear and a new paradigm since 9/11, though, yes. Days is absolutely right. Heat doesn't rise even though it does, the collapse of building 7 wasn't reported before it happened even though you saw it, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Wonderful post.

my very first OpEd, I'm so proud. I read it to my wife and she laughed at my naiveté... she said the same thing you and Jen said, her version went kind of like this; "minorities have been dealing with that forever". Then she called me a rich white boy again, I hate when she does that.

fun piece to write, I knocked it off without any edits, just shot it out there, sometimes that's the best way to do it... keeps the flow going in the post. The old writers on the fray were great at that, my posts were a tad choppy, but hey, I was writing about money, it was more math than literature. It felt good to write something and have a JackDallas or Catnapping alert you that you just kicked out some beautiful poetry... whoa! really? cool.

here's an old funny I wrote in Kausville, a land out of time...



TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2005

Rhymes with Orange


I once knew an astronaut
who thought his craft was wrought
with not enough style
to win over hearts while
race cars the people bought

He told engineers his plight
to get more to fancy his flight
he recommended more flange
and painting his ship orange
and to hell with all the white

(I knew it could be done!)

 

[Days]

Jen's right, though, that it goes back a long ways before 9/11...............
.............. .............. ............................
High gear and a new paradigm since 9/11, though, yes. Days is absolutely right. Heat doesn't rise even though it does, the collapse of building 7 wasn't reported before it happened even though you saw it, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
...............

that was the heart of the post... it was subtle yet powerful change in our way of reasoning. We were no longer allowed to make an argument the old way, those attempts were blown out of the water. None of us are the same. Think about how hard it was to program a VCR back when they first came; it was soooooo hard to understand, we just didn't think in digital yet, it made no sense to our natural minds. Once we adjusted, everything changed.

I remember the days when it was hard to know how to end a phone call. Thank God for cell phones. After so many dropped calls with Sprint, ending a call without it ending became habit. What I do today all the time, I would have been offended by, 20 years ago.

Today, posting a picture proves nothing unless you can prove the picture wasn't digitally altered. A whole new logic was born and it was very hard to prove anything. We adjusted. ... and it changed us.

Here's one of the strange consequences of that. Watch how this works. A while back I tried to post on how the pancake theory was complete nonsense. But I couldn't get people to see the obvious faults of the theory, mainly because I was posting pics of the collapse and even though no one was questioning the authenticity of the pics, our general way of processing info in cyber space had evolved to the point where we no longer trust pics. So I couldn't get anyone to do the exercise of looking at the pics. My argument was bulletproof according to physics, it was obviously true, but it was dead on arrival, all because pics are no longer allowed in argument.

Life with these computers...
We forget just how much it has changed us.

 

[Queen Titania]

Before 09/11 our nation was still thinking carbon based thoughts, we listened to authority, we made sure things were "official" or we rejected them... and it was a big deal if something was rejected! I remember at the age of 14, when Richard Milhouse Nixon resigned from the oval office, I asked my dad "why is the president resigning?" ... and his answer was, "he lied to us". What a strange answer. But in those days, Americans believed their government, and it was a huge crime to tell a lie. On 09/11/2001 that all changed.

Enter the digital revolution. We no longer believe authority, we no longer believe the media, it isn't "accept but verify" - it is more like "find out how they are lying"... because you can damn sure count on it, they ALWAYS lie. This is the new paradigm. We rifled through a thousand lies made to cover up the real culprits behind 09/11. We got attacked just for investigating; we were labeled "conspiracy theorists" and "anti-Semites" and we were cussed out and condemned and banned from posting. Evidence was taken down over and over... authority did not want the truth to come out. (Because the truth is, 09/11 was done by the Mossad) But we kept on fighting for the truth and a new paradigm began to take shape; digital based thinking, a whole new way of reasoning. And a whole new generation was raised ... to not trust authority.

The irony of this paradigm shift to digital based thought is that the basic argument of 09/11 is a carbon based argument. Good old mechanical engineering is needed to grasp what happened. The old authority was turned on its head. This was exceedingly evil. Simple physics were no longer reliable arguments. Buildings can fall down for no reason, steel superstructure can fail without the superstructure being demolished, all the rudiments of old logic was no longer important. Steel that was cold enough to grab with your bare hands and hold onto, was also hot enough to fail from intense heat. Fire burned up, but the heat went down. Explosions that happened everywhere were not proof of explosives. Discovery of traces of nano explosives in the ash was not proof of traces of nano explosives in the ash. In short, everything was denied. The entire history of fire prevention was no longer valid argument; all logic, all history, all science, anything known to mankind was no longer valid argument... in the new paradigm, stupid-speak reigned supreme, while intelligence was deemed inferior.

Now, I understand it was a psy-op... I understand that the forces behind it are not interested in the advancement of mankind... they have their marching orders and that's what they do. But the damage done to the human intellect is horrific. Human intelligence has been rendered inoperative. Intelligence itself is no longer a function of the human brain, it is a security apparatus of the state. The central intelligence found it necessary to attack and destroy individual intelligence. All hail the new intelligence! It is no longer an intelligent intelligence.

Gone are the days when you can point out simple truths. Simple truth is utterly rejected. Propaganda rules the day. Truth has no place in the new paradigm. Facts are befuddled by disinformation. Seeing is allowed, believing is not. It is a brave new digital world. Human logic doesn't have a place in the cyber reality. When someone online demands you to prove something... there is no way to prove anything online. Everything is questioned, nothing is allowed. When it got so bad that I wasn't allowed to say "heat rises" - I knew I was in trouble. In the new paradigm of digital think, water is no longer wet. Everything is an illusion. Nothing is real. You can't prove out real world ideas in the land of illusion. See those people hanging to the steel in the impact gashes of the World Trade Center? Will you admit that the steel has cooled? Nope. No reason to admit that the steel has cooled, just because humans have wrapped themselves around the steel with their bare hands and arms.

That crazy old way of thinking is gone. Back when men were men and women were women. Welcome to the world of intersex. What the hell is that, you ask? It is digital think. You can't be sure of anything.

This is scarier than it sounds.

The irony of the 'inside job' 9/11 is that it was perceived as a declaration of war on the UsofA - when in fact and in reality it was a declaration of war by the USofA on the whole of the rest of the world - The Insidious Empire.

 

[Days]

The irony of the 'inside job' 9/11 is that it was perceived as a declaration of war on the UsofA - when in fact and in reality it was a declaration of war by the USofA on the whole of the rest of the world - The Insidious Empire.

It might best be equated to a modern day crusade against all Islam.