New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

31 Dems voted to save Santos

Principle. Something alien to the winger mind.

Of course, the motion to oust Santos would have failed even if all Dems voted for the motion. Most Republicans want him there no matter what he does.
 
Principle. Something alien to the winger mind.

Of course, the motion to oust Santos would have failed even if all Dems voted for the motion. Most Republicans want him there no matter what he does.
Hehe. Literally NOTHING can move Paid-sy to do anything but compliment all Democrats. Blinding hackery in every post.
Note to self: ignore all Humpsy posts.
 
Hehe. Literally NOTHING can move Paid-sy to do anything but compliment all Democrats. Blinding hackery in every post.
Note to self: ignore all Humpsy posts.

The Most Boring Man in the World checks in to post his favorite repetitive, insipid drivel.
 
Not going to fall for GOPers BS.
They pushed the Santos vote to before he was found guilty by court or found in violation by the ethics committee. Meaning, they would set the precedent of removing someone before they had been found guilty.

Imagine how the crooked GOP would use that in the future to remove members of the opposition on allegations alone.

Sorry, but the Dems still believe in the rule of law, even if the GOP has thrown it out the window.
 

Not really, our resident communist party is smart enough to realize that it is better to have Santos in the House where they can continue to beat the GOP over the head with him. Politics, plain and simple.

I think Santos is a criminal and a sociopath (not the only one in Congress) but in terms of the damage he could do, it's NOTHING compared to say what Adam Schiff has done to the country, in comparison it wouldn't register at all.

So both sides can spare me the "these lies can't stand" bullshit while people like Schiff a notorious lying sack of shit is still a member of Congress.
 
Back
Top