A question for the Stone sentencing defenders.

[Spamature]

Let us suppose you have a loved one who took a trip to LA or NY.

And they were found severely beaten and in a coma in some alley.

The cops arrest member of the governors campaign staff , on a gun violation charge.
Let's call him Rodrigo Roca.

In the process on the investigation they find that he has on his phone conversations with gang call the La Rusos. And in these conversations are discussing and joking about the attack on your loved on La Rusos turf with the La Rusos and also with the governor's campaign staff no less. Roca seems to know a lot attack. But when questioned about it he refuses to cooperate with the investigation into the brutal crime against your loved one. He then even goes so far as to threaten others who might have information about the crime that they could relate to the police. More so he even goes so far as to make threatening statements to the judge in his case.

Roca is found guilty on the gun charge and prosecutors recommend a sentenced within state sentencing guidelines for his offense.

Should the governor override the decisions by prosecutors and in the Rodrigo Roca in an attempt to lesson his sentence ?

If so, why ?

 

[sensible don]

the more lawless VP Trump* is the better they like it !

 

[Spamature]

the more lawless VP Trump* is the better they like it !

I want to see how much or little they love it. I suspect they will be reluctant to voice their support for Rodrigo Ruso being given a lighter sentence.

 

[excalibur]

Roger Stone did not commit a violent act, as the OP's fictional character did.

Furthermore, the DOJ insiders were astonished when the Weissmann hacks sought the sentencing they did and alerted higher-ups about it. Barr acted properly, well within his capacity as AG.

And we also know that the judge in the Stone trial allowed anti-Trumpers on that jury.

Roger Stone jury foreperson's anti-Trump social media posts surface after she defends DOJ prosecutors

Former Memphis City Schools Board President Tomeka Hart revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson of the jury that convicted former Trump adviser Roger Stone on obstruction charges last year, and soon afterward, a string of her anti-Trump, left-wing social media posts came to light.

www.foxnews.com

 

[SoccerMom]

Let us suppose you have a loved one who took a trip to LA or NY.

And they were found severely beaten and in a coma in some alley.

The cops arrest member of the governors campaign staff , on a gun violation charge.
Let's call him Rodrigo Roca.

In the process on the investigation they find that he has on his phone conversations with gang call the La Rusos. And in these conversations are discussing and joking about the attack on your loved on La Rusos turf with the La Rusos and also with the governor's campaign staff no less. Roca seems to know a lot attack. But when questioned about it he refuses to cooperate with the investigation into the brutal crime against your loved one. He then even goes so far as to threaten others who might have information about the crime that they could relate to the police. More so he even goes so far as to make threatening statements to the judge in his case.

Roca is found guilty on the gun charge and prosecutors recommend a sentenced within state sentencing guidelines for his offense.

Should the governor override the decisions by prosecutors and in the Rodrigo Roca in an attempt to lesson his sentence ?

If so, why ?

Your analogy doesn't work, that's why.

The charges against Stone were flimsy at best and the jury was tainted. I'm getting ready to post this:

Roger Stone will get a mistrial, thanks to Tomeka Hart- and Donald Trump - Flopping Aces

When the dam bursts, a lot of water is released. The Roger Stone dam has burst and we have a flood of new information that should absolutely result in a mistrial. Desperate to find something to hang Trump and justify its existence, the Mueller team had been investigating Roger Stone for some...

www.floppingaces.net

 

[reason10]

Let us suppose you have a loved one who took a trip to LA or NY.

And they were found severely beaten and in a coma in some alley.

The cops arrest member of the governors campaign staff , on a gun violation charge.
Let's call him Rodrigo Roca.

In the process on the investigation they find that he has on his phone conversations with gang call the La Rusos. And in these conversations are discussing and joking about the attack on your loved on La Rusos turf with the La Rusos and also with the governor's campaign staff no less. Roca seems to know a lot attack. But when questioned about it he refuses to cooperate with the investigation into the brutal crime against your loved one. He then even goes so far as to threaten others who might have information about the crime that they could relate to the police. More so he even goes so far as to make threatening statements to the judge in his case.

Roca is found guilty on the gun charge and prosecutors recommend a sentenced within state sentencing guidelines for his offense.

Should the governor override the decisions by prosecutors and in the Rodrigo Roca in an attempt to lesson his sentence ?

If so, why ?

Stone tweeted someone. He broke no laws.. He doesn't deserve to spend a second behind bars just because you edited didn't like the outcome of the 2016 election.

 

[Spamature]

Stone tweeted someone. He broke no laws.. He doesn't deserve to spend a second behind bars just because you fkkking idiots didn't like the outcome of the 2016 election.

Stone was convicted for the crimes he perpetrated.. It is what it is. But I gave you an example of his behavior and I am asking you why that behavior should be rewarded with a lighter sentence.

If it were your loved one laying battered in that alley. Would you approve of Mr Roca receive a reduced sentence for his crime after not cooperating with law enforcement and in fact threatening witness who might help find their attacker.

If so, why.

It's a very simple question. No need to wander off onto other topics.

 

[Spamature]

Your analogy doesn't work, that's why.

The charges against Stone were flimsy at best and the jury was tainted. I'm getting ready to post this:

Roger Stone will get a mistrial, thanks to Tomeka Hart- and Donald Trump - Flopping Aces

When the dam bursts, a lot of water is released. The Roger Stone dam has burst and we have a flood of new information that should absolutely result in a mistrial. Desperate to find something to hang Trump and justify its existence, the Mueller team had been investigating Roger Stone for some...

www.floppingaces.net

Then I guess the author of that piece should have been his lawyer. Because the jury obviously didn't buy the arguments of the lawyers .

Anyway you didn't answer the question.

You cons seem to have some issue with wanting to blather about everything except for the topic at hand today.

 

[Jack4freedom]

Roger Stone did not commit a violent act, as the OP's fictional character did.

Furthermore, the DOJ insiders were astonished when the Weissmann hacks sought the sentencing they did and alerted higher-ups about it. Barr acted properly, well within his capacity as AG.

And we also know that the judge in the Stone trial allowed anti-Trumpers on that jury.

Roger Stone jury foreperson's anti-Trump social media posts surface after she defends DOJ prosecutors

Former Memphis City Schools Board President Tomeka Hart revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson of the jury that convicted former Trump adviser Roger Stone on obstruction charges last year, and soon afterward, a string of her anti-Trump, left-wing social media posts came to light.

www.foxnews.com

If the judge disallowed anti Trumpers on the jury it would have consisted of all Hannitized Ditto Heads. How fair would that have been?

 

[Spamature]

Roger Stone did not commit a violent act, as the OP's fictional character did.

Furthermore, the DOJ insiders were astonished when the Weissmann hacks sought the sentencing they did and alerted higher-ups about it. Barr acted properly, well within his capacity as AG.

And we also know that the judge in the Stone trial allowed anti-Trumpers on that jury.

Roger Stone jury foreperson's anti-Trump social media posts surface after she defends DOJ prosecutors

Former Memphis City Schools Board President Tomeka Hart revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson of the jury that convicted former Trump adviser Roger Stone on obstruction charges last year, and soon afterward, a string of her anti-Trump, left-wing social media posts came to light.

www.foxnews.com

Rodrigo Roca was not accused of committing a violent act. He was picked up on a gun charge.

How are you so confused about my post ?

Also there is a process called voir dire.

Stone's legal team has a voice in jury selection.

Voir dire - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[excalibur]

Stone tweeted someone. He broke no laws.. He doesn't deserve to spend a second behind bars just because you fkkking idiots didn't like the outcome of the 2016 election.

That is why the Left calls Trump fascist, because it is who they are. Classic leftist act.

 

[excalibur]

Rodrigo Roca was not accused of committing a violent act. He was picked up on a gun charge.

How are you so confused about my post ?

You wrote this:

Let us suppose you have a loved one who took a trip to LA or NY.

And they were found severely beaten and in a coma in some alley.​

Perhaps you are confused as to what you started out the OP with.

 

[EatTheRich]

You wrote this:

​

Let us suppose you have a loved one who took a trip to LA or NY.​

​

And they were found severely beaten and in a coma in some alley.​

Perhaps you are confused as to what you started out the OP with.

The “loved one” in this analogy is our battered representative government.