New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Annnnnnnd... here's Rayshard's rap sheet...

If a cop murdered him, then YES the cop should get the death penalty. But no cop murdered him. He DID try to kill a cop and the cop DEFENDED himself with deadly force.

And the very prosecutor who began this cross burning witch hunt of a police officer said it himself: "A Taser is a deadly weapon according to Georgia Law." That animal fired a deadly weapon at the officer and the officer defended himself.

There was no murder. It was justifiable homicide. And the cop and his family should sue the city of Atlanta for false arrest and defamation of character.
More evidence that the prosecutor is trying to throw the case, as usual. Bottom line: Brooks was shot in the back, so even if an officer was hurt, it was not self-defense but revenge.
 
Stealing the taser from the cop and running from the scene of this is a FELONY in Georgia Law. FIRING this deadly weapon at the cop is therefore ATTEMPTED FELONY MURDER.
And the police had every right to arrest him on that charge and hold him for trial. Not to try him themselves and execute him on the spot after he no longer posed a danger.
 
If that gives you pleasure? Have at it.

A while back, it used to give me a pleasure to beat down these highly uneducated liberals and visualize them melting down every time they lost an argument. I'm starting to wonder if there are any real posters here at all. I'm wondering if the liberal posters here are just some machine designed to mimic absolute ignorance and total immaturity.

Now I don't know.
 
A while back, it used to give me a pleasure to beat down these highly uneducated liberals and visualize them melting down every time they lost an argument. I'm starting to wonder if there are any real posters here at all. I'm wondering if the liberal posters here are just some machine designed to mimic absolute ignorance and total immaturity.

Now I don't know.
So it's like playing ping pong against the folded table face. Some utility but then gets boring. I'm getting there for sure.
 
You are ALL wrong. First of all, Mr. Brooks entire arrest record stems from 2 domestic violence incidents which happened 6 years ago and were adjudicated and disposed of at that time. The woman and the children involved were still living with him at the time of his death 6 years later. To be fair about this, let’s hear what they have to say about Mr. Brooks now. All you Christians out there should read about redemption and forgiveness which I have heard is a big part of the Christian Religion. That said passing judgement or calling him an animal is very un Christian to say the least.

As far as calling the Officer involved, Mr. Rolfe a murderer who should get the death penalty, that’s extremely vindictive and ignorant also. I do not think Officer Rolfe intentionally killed Mr. Brooks with malicious intent. He acted unprofessionally and illegally in reaction to a violent confrontation in a matter of seconds and caused the untimely death of Mr. Brooks. He is however responsible for his illegal actions such as firing his weapon into a crowded parking lot and endangering innocent bystanders as well as killing Mr. Brooks who was fleeing by shooting him in the back. I predict that Officer Rolfe will plead guilty to voluntary manslaughter and be sentenced to 8-15 years and be released in around 6.
 
Back
Top