New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Bad At Math.....

Zam-Zam

Senator
Representative Ocasio-Cortez might want to check her numbers before posting her work:


Ocasio-Cortez called out for claiming Pentagon $$ error could fund Medicare for all


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was roundly fact-checked this week -- by even liberal-leaning publications -- for suggesting a reported $21 trillion in Pentagon accounting errors could fund most of her proposed "Medicare for all" health care program.

Ocasio-Cortez, one of the highest-profile figures among the new wave of liberal Democrats entering Congress in 2019, cited a Nation story about how $21 trillion in "Pentagon financial transactions" between 1998 and 2015 could not be documented or explained.

“$21T in Pentagon accounting errors. Medicare for All costs ~$32T,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “That means 66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon.”

Ocasio-Cortez and others pushing "Medicare for all" have long faced questions about the government-backed health care program's price tag and how it could be funded. They often push back by noting Americans already spend enormous amounts on private insurance premiums and other out-of-pocket expenses, and taxpayers fund a variety of other costly government schemes that could be curtailed.

But multiple fact-checkers gave a clear verdict to Ocasio-Cortez’s suggestion that Pentagon accounting errors could largely cover the costs: it wasn’t true.

As left-wing Vox explained: “The Pentagon’s accounting errors are genuinely enormous, but they’re also just accounting errors -- they don’t represent actual money that can be spent on something else.”

Underscoring the disconnect between the original story and Ocasio-Cortez's Twitter claim, Vox continued: "Indeed, there simply hasn’t been $21 trillion in (nominal) Defense Department spending across the entirety of American history."


Complete text: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oc...ng-pentagon-cash-would-cover-medicare-for-all


Oopsie……:>)
 
As left-wing Vox explained: “The Pentagon’s accounting errors are genuinely enormous, but they’re also just accounting errors -- they don’t represent actual money that can be spent on something else.”

It's absolutely terrifying that an elected official is so stupid she needs to be corrected by the likes of Vox. Scary stuff...what have the democrats done to us?
 
Last edited:
Could be that she thought she could make any outrageous claim, and no one would call her on it.

Or, it could be that she's simply in over her head.

Next comes the damage control....."The Congresswoman misspoke...."

:D

I am not sure she cares.

Cortez, Bernie (the biggest [Unwelcome language removed] in all of American politics) Sanders and Warren operate on the notion of fantasy. The Government can give you anything you want with no consequence is the pillar of their philosophy.

So, so what if the money is just an error and does not translate into actual dollars you can spend? Why can't we just say we did it, we will just say it's actual money and make all the bad things in the world go away and proceed to give people all thing things they want. Who needs to work, for anything? Birthday cakes and balloons for everyone!

It's absolutely [Unwelcome language removed] absurd, yet it defines them. Idiocracy is coming soon, very soon.
 
Representative Ocasio-Cortez might want to check her numbers before posting her work:


Ocasio-Cortez called out for claiming Pentagon $$ error could fund Medicare for all


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was roundly fact-checked this week -- by even liberal-leaning publications -- for suggesting a reported $21 trillion in Pentagon accounting errors could fund most of her proposed "Medicare for all" health care program.

Ocasio-Cortez, one of the highest-profile figures among the new wave of liberal Democrats entering Congress in 2019, cited a Nation story about how $21 trillion in "Pentagon financial transactions" between 1998 and 2015 could not be documented or explained.

“$21T in Pentagon accounting errors. Medicare for All costs ~$32T,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “That means 66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon.”

Ocasio-Cortez and others pushing "Medicare for all" have long faced questions about the government-backed health care program's price tag and how it could be funded. They often push back by noting Americans already spend enormous amounts on private insurance premiums and other out-of-pocket expenses, and taxpayers fund a variety of other costly government schemes that could be curtailed.

But multiple fact-checkers gave a clear verdict to Ocasio-Cortez’s suggestion that Pentagon accounting errors could largely cover the costs: it wasn’t true.

As left-wing Vox explained: “The Pentagon’s accounting errors are genuinely enormous, but they’re also just accounting errors -- they don’t represent actual money that can be spent on something else.”

Underscoring the disconnect between the original story and Ocasio-Cortez's Twitter claim, Vox continued: "Indeed, there simply hasn’t been $21 trillion in (nominal) Defense Department spending across the entirety of American history."


Complete text: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oc...ng-pentagon-cash-would-cover-medicare-for-all


Oopsie……:>)

Sadly we'll sooner see a rise in persons elected who will believe her math, than additional corrections to her math.
Watch you'll see
 
Representative Ocasio-Cortez might want to check her numbers before posting her work:


Ocasio-Cortez called out for claiming Pentagon $$ error could fund Medicare for all


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was roundly fact-checked this week -- by even liberal-leaning publications -- for suggesting a reported $21 trillion in Pentagon accounting errors could fund most of her proposed "Medicare for all" health care program.

Ocasio-Cortez, one of the highest-profile figures among the new wave of liberal Democrats entering Congress in 2019, cited a Nation story about how $21 trillion in "Pentagon financial transactions" between 1998 and 2015 could not be documented or explained.

“$21T in Pentagon accounting errors. Medicare for All costs ~$32T,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “That means 66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon.”

Ocasio-Cortez and others pushing "Medicare for all" have long faced questions about the government-backed health care program's price tag and how it could be funded. They often push back by noting Americans already spend enormous amounts on private insurance premiums and other out-of-pocket expenses, and taxpayers fund a variety of other costly government schemes that could be curtailed.

But multiple fact-checkers gave a clear verdict to Ocasio-Cortez’s suggestion that Pentagon accounting errors could largely cover the costs: it wasn’t true.

As left-wing Vox explained: “The Pentagon’s accounting errors are genuinely enormous, but they’re also just accounting errors -- they don’t represent actual money that can be spent on something else.”

Underscoring the disconnect between the original story and Ocasio-Cortez's Twitter claim, Vox continued: "Indeed, there simply hasn’t been $21 trillion in (nominal) Defense Department spending across the entirety of American history."


Complete text: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oc...ng-pentagon-cash-would-cover-medicare-for-all


Oopsie……:>)

The DOD accounting system loses track of about 1 billion dollars a year. Not sure where the trillion numbers are coming from.
 
Representative Ocasio-Cortez might want to check her numbers before posting her work:


Ocasio-Cortez called out for claiming Pentagon $$ error could fund Medicare for all


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was roundly fact-checked this week -- by even liberal-leaning publications -- for suggesting a reported $21 trillion in Pentagon accounting errors could fund most of her proposed "Medicare for all" health care program.

Ocasio-Cortez, one of the highest-profile figures among the new wave of liberal Democrats entering Congress in 2019, cited a Nation story about how $21 trillion in "Pentagon financial transactions" between 1998 and 2015 could not be documented or explained.

“$21T in Pentagon accounting errors. Medicare for All costs ~$32T,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted. “That means 66% of Medicare for All could have been funded already by the Pentagon.”

Ocasio-Cortez and others pushing "Medicare for all" have long faced questions about the government-backed health care program's price tag and how it could be funded. They often push back by noting Americans already spend enormous amounts on private insurance premiums and other out-of-pocket expenses, and taxpayers fund a variety of other costly government schemes that could be curtailed.

But multiple fact-checkers gave a clear verdict to Ocasio-Cortez’s suggestion that Pentagon accounting errors could largely cover the costs: it wasn’t true.

As left-wing Vox explained: “The Pentagon’s accounting errors are genuinely enormous, but they’re also just accounting errors -- they don’t represent actual money that can be spent on something else.”

Underscoring the disconnect between the original story and Ocasio-Cortez's Twitter claim, Vox continued: "Indeed, there simply hasn’t been $21 trillion in (nominal) Defense Department spending across the entirety of American history."


Complete text: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oc...ng-pentagon-cash-would-cover-medicare-for-all


Oopsie……:>)
She's not in charge, Nancy is. Nancy is famous for her math skills. No speaker who ever held the position can count votes like her. Or at least that's what her record shows.
 
alexandria_ocasio-cortez-1530544424-e1530544520559.jpg


But she is Democrats pretty!
 
Nancy has severe dementia.

and Nancy hasn't been voted on yet
spam counts his chicks before their hatched
new house millennials have other plans and
how can they refuse [Unwelcome language removed] a black woman as speaker
 
Shhhhh..... Sit still and be quiet. The spell will pass.

And then Nancy wont remember something else. Right now she is like the weather in Oklahoma, if you don't like what she said wait 10 minutes and you will get a different answer on the same subject.


17 Democrats pledge to vote against Nancy Pelosi as speaker
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/15/17-democrats-pledge-vote-against-nancy-pelosi-spea/

Apparently even "You people" do not agree with you.
 
and Nancy hasn't been voted on yet
spam counts his chicks before their hatched
new house millennials have other plans and
how can they refuse [Unwelcome language removed] a black woman as speaker
There was no one running against her.


Are you holding out for a chance that your Benghazi Frame Up blabber mouth McCarthy will be speaker ?
 
Back
Top