New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Barack Hussein Obama thinks you are stupid about his oil policy...

NCmusicman

NCmusicman

Governor
Bottom line on Keystone/Canada oil to USA and his chicanery tour yesterday:
Obama has rope-a-doped those that think he approved what he did not approve and that he will approve what he has prevented.
 
And I thought the libs would agree that they have been taken for a ride on the Obama Express to High Gas Prices.. enyoy the demobilization of America and the banning by Obama of The Great American Road Trip and The Long Weekend Vacation.
 
"Barack Hussein Obama thinks you are stupid about his oil policy..."

And when it comes to liberals, he's 100% correct.
 
It was the Republican Governor of Nebraska who asked Obama to re-route the northern leg to avoid endangering the water supply for 2 million people.

But don't let facts interfere with your circle jerk. Maybe get a room, though. No one wants to watch.
 
Obama chose to harm the nation instead of be a leader and get the job done to help our country ... we have pipelines throughout the USA and no water supplies are endangered by them... I hate to break it to you but many have been rope-A-doped.

But relax - Obama DID ask Saudi Arabia to pump more oil!!!!

zzigzzag said:
It was the Republican Governor of Nebraska who asked Obama to re-route the northern leg to avoid endangering the water supply for 2 million people.

But don't let facts interfere with your circle jerk. Maybe get a room, though. No one wants to watch.
Click to expand...
 
And, there were already other routes laid out with that taken into consideration...your point? Blame it on Nebraska if you like, but Obama was the one that ordered the halt and postponed everything. But, you'll notice that he (in front of a media circus) gave his approval for the pipeline in the southern states...you know, the area that he has absolutely no control over whether it gets built or not.
 
Your talking points were cancelled last night. Did you miss it? Move on to the next diversion from the hilarious Etch-a Sketch guy who's destroying the "conservative movement" for you. It should be issued by....what time does Rush come on?
 
...no he doesn't - clearly a "pipeline" is a transportation system - and "oil" is a global commodity - got it?
 
Silly liberals...they think that all conservatives support Romney and listen to Limbaugh. So, show me how my talking point was cancelled so I can spank your ass on another subject...
 
...just so you understand - the oil will be sold at the global cost - if we do not pay the going price for oil we can install 500 pipelines and they won't pump any oil in our direction - OK? Got it now? nocluemoosickperson?
 
Typically more of a product entering the market levels the price a bit...a large amount of product entering the market starts to lower the price. Now, how much of the product that this line is supposed to produce is hitting the market as we type here?
 
Silly liberals...they think that all conservatives support Romney and listen to Limbaugh.

Yep. All of them will lie about it on the way to the polls to vote for Romney with Rush on the radio, too.

I don't know what you're spankin' there, but you're obviously fantasizing while you do it.
 
...one article I read showed that Canada is already 700K of the total 850K BBL via other transportation systems. Regardless of the additional 150K BBL, we still need to pay the price of the commodity. What the pipeline does do is reduce source risk but that is about all...
 
Other liberals on here that DO have the ability to think on their own know you're wrong about that in regards to me...but, stay in Never Never Land if you choose to...I won't lose sleep at night because someone projects their weaknesses on to me.
 
And, reducing source risk creates greater stability in the market place...thus making the price much less volatile...according to every economics class I've ever sat in. Now, think if the US were allowed to tap the oil under public land both continental and underwater and imagine the reduction in source risk we would experience...hell, we might even get to see prices under $1 per gallon like they do in oil producing nations.
 
...oil companies in the US ARE allowed to explore for oil under public lands - imagine if they actually did...
 
Not quite the truth there Fig...here, you might find this an interesting read...

High Gas Prices: Obama's Half-Truths vs. Reality

I like this part the best, doubt if you will though...

Increased oil and gas production in the U.S. is a great development, but this is a result of increased production on private lands in North Dakota, Texas, and Alaska. On federal lands and offshore, the story is much grimmer. Production on federal lands and offshore could have yielded more output, increasing supply and therefore putting downward pressure on oil prices. Poor administrative decisions—such as refusing to open areas to exploration and production, cancelling or delaying lease sales, and the offshore drilling moratorium and subsequent “permitorium”—significantly reduced oil production, destroying jobs and reducing economic activity in the process.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top