New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Benghazi

Not even the shrill rantings of Fox Noise support your claim that we had assets that could go 400 miles in 20 minutes, and deliver pinpoint relief in a street fight.

But that's the kind of silly nonsense people come up with when they substitute right wing hype for thinking.,
 
NCmusicman said:
Obama has been asked by very few media reporters -- "Who made decision to not help the victims?".. Obama sidesteps / ignores the question and refuses to answer. It's all about his reelection, NOT being a Commander In Chief.
Click to expand...

Therefore, we have a conspiracy.
 
NCmusicman said:
Obama has been asked by very few media reporters -- "Who made decision to not help the victims?".. Obama sidesteps / ignores the question and refuses to answer. It's all about his reelection, NOT being a Commander In Chief.
Click to expand...


There are questions as to what capacity he was there in anyway, was he even there officially ? There are lots of odd question marks around the whole thing .........but the bombing of Libya has sent her into total Chaos, it is a dangerous place for everybody not just Americans. They get paid danger money in these places for good reason.
 
How in God's name did you get that I was "unconcerned"? I noticed you didn't cite one single attack that occurred before Bush came to office. Does that mean you're "unconcerned" about them, or only when a republican is in office do you suddenly become civic minded?

But since you're obviously stuck in distraction mode, let's play you're little game. Which of these attacks did Bush deny help to those who were attacked? Which of these attacks did Bush cover for the terrorists by blaming the attack on something like a Youtube video? Which of these attacks did Bush try to cover up because of his re-election campaign? Which of these attacks were NOT investigated?
 
Colorforms said:
So leaving 4 Americans to die after numerous requests for assistance when help was all but 20 minutes away because it might hinder Obama's re-election campaign is not "policy"?
Click to expand...

No. There is no evidence to support the claim that people in the Adminstration conspired to deny assistance for poltical reasons. Every right wing whack job out there is shouting it from the roof tops.

Yet, there isn't a shred of evidence to support it, and many of the right wing claims are ludicrous and contradictory.

Little wonder this fact free circus is being ignored by media everywhere in the world outside the hyper partisan parochial land of low information voters.
 
Yes, the word from just about every high ranking military official involved. But since it's not confirmed by the investigation, such as it is, then I am still chalking it up to speculation.

But since you have already labeled me as "vulnerable to propaganda" for holding back on my accusation and only labeling it hearsay, then I may as well go ahead and say that Obama did kill those 4 men for political gain.

There, happy now?
 
well, there's both their real incompetence, and then their use of the description to hide their criminality, like in Iraq
 
Boca said:
What the hell are you talking about? There were daily reports of the killed and wounded, and even civilian casualties, during the Bush Administration. When was the last time you heard of the number kiled and wounded in Afghanistan since January, 2009? For that matter do you know how many Mexican officials and civilians were killed with Fast and Furious weapons?
Click to expand...

Oh, puhleeze!! There's been more media coverage of the attack on the consulate in Benghazi than there was of ALL those other attacks on our embassies and consulates PUT TOGETHER! It's been almost wall-to-wall around-the-clock coverage on Fox 'News'.
 
Colorforms said:
How in God's name did you get that I was "unconcerned"? I noticed you didn't cite one single attack that occurred before Bush came to office. Does that mean you're "unconcerned" about them, or only when a republican is in office do you suddenly become civic minded?

But since you're obviously stuck in distraction mode, let's play you're little game. Which of these attacks did Bush deny help to those who were attacked? Which of these attacks did Bush cover for the terrorists by blaming the attack on something like a Youtube video? Which of these attacks did Bush try to cover up because of his re-election campaign? Which of these attacks were NOT investigated?
Click to expand...

As soon as you have any, uh, EVIDENCE, for your claims here, do let us know.
 
indeed, that's how they operate -- they cite a supposition/falsehood like a denial of help, etc, they can't validate outside of their imagination as a premise, then expect their conclusions to be the unvarnished truth. Most rightwingers don't know what the essential elements of a valid argument are, which is why they confuse their flawed opinions/conclusions with "facts".

This is why real "debate" can never be had with any of them, just something akin to arguing with a knownothing child.
 
I asked YOU a question. It's Okay to intimate that Bush handled any of these attacks as incompetently as Obama, but as soon as you're asked for any kind of facts, you run.

Great lefty tactic.
 
Colorforms said:
You know, Degs, I can actually see you doing it too.
Click to expand...

Yup. and Backing it up with VERIFIABLE FACTS... and Calling Mr. Wood on his bullsh!t. I'd of course offer my condolances for the loss of his son. But I would also point out that such a loss - is only dishonored by the lies he is spreading.
 
Colorforms said:
Yes, the word from just about every high ranking military official involved.
Click to expand...
That's not even remotely close to true. There is a claim from ONE RETIRED officer who claims this without attribution.

Sorry you are making Sh!t up again.

Can't tell if you are serious about your claim that Obama killed the four men who died in Benghazi for political gain or are you just trying to ridicule CatsEye..

And that is sadly telling about how much of a sucker for propganda and repeating it you have been.
 
And after you told him that there was no screw up in the death of his son, and that even though there was help a short distance away that was never dispatched, if he did anything short of hospitalizing you, I would be severely disappointed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top