New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Benghazi

Boltlady

Boltlady

Governor
So according to the following we were using Benghazi as a way to get weapons transferred to the 'rebels' in Syria. The following is not the only place that I've seen that bit of information and it does make a lot more sense out of what ultimately happened.

You folks will believe what you want to believe because the truth is usually pretty inconvenient.

CNN confirms WND reporting on gun-running in Benghazi
 
Boltlady said:
So according to the following we were using Benghazi as a way to get weapons transferred to the 'rebels' in Syria. The following is not the only place that I've seen that bit of information and it does make a lot more sense out of what ultimately happened.

You folks will believe what you want to believe because the truth is usually pretty inconvenient.

CNN confirms WND reporting on gun-running in Benghazi
Click to expand...



From the linked article:


CNN is reporting lawmakers are speculating on the possibility U.S. agencies operating in the Benghazi compound attacked Sept. 11, 2012, were secretly helping to transfer weapons from Libya, via Turkey, to the rebels in Syria.


That possibility was first reported by WND two weeks after the Benghazi attack, when the news agency cited Egyptian security officials who said murdered U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens played a central role in arming and recruiting rebels to fight Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.


In November 2012, Middle Eastern security sources further described both the U.S. mission and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi as an intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels, which included weapons shipments being coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.


Many rebel fighters are openly members of terrorist organizations, including al-Qaida.


The information may help determine what motivated the deadly attacks in Benghazi.



But, but, wait. Hadn't that already been determined? We were told, repeatedly, that an Internet video was solely responsible for the "spontaneous uprising" which, coincidentally occurred on September 11th. They seemed so sure.....
 
Zam-Zam said:
But, but, wait. Hadn't that already been determined? We were told, repeatedly, that an Internet video was solely responsible for the "spontaneous uprising" which, coincidentally occurred on September 11th. They seemed so sure.....
Click to expand...


If you exposed yourself to unbiased reporting, then you wouldn't be so confused.

It's obvious that this CIA safe house in Benghazi was a hiding place for the President's real Birth Certificate -- from Kenya! ;)
 
NightSwimmer said:
If you exposed yourself to unbiased reporting, then you wouldn't be so confused.

It's obvious that this CIA safe house in Benghazi was a hiding place for the President's real Birth Certificate -- from Kenya! ;)
Click to expand...


That's the spirit. Avoiding the issue is your best play.
 
My play is ignoring the stupidity. You've got your 20 to 25% living in the bubble to share your conspiracy theories with. The rest of us couldn't care less.
 
NightSwimmer said:
My play is ignoring the stupidity. You've got your 20 to 25% living in the bubble to share your conspiracy theories with. The rest of us couldn't care less.
Click to expand...


Obviously then you don't consider this topic stupid, or you wouldn't have replied to it three times already.
 
Zam-Zam said:
Obviously then you don't consider this topic stupid, or you wouldn't have replied to it three times already.
Click to expand...


You're wrong. I have time for a bit of levity now and then.

Benghazi was supposed to be the big October Surprise that would win the White House for Mitt Romney. Eventually, you guys are going to have to come to grips with the fact that it was a failure and just get over it. There never was any "there" there.
 
NightSwimmer said:
You're wrong. I have time for a bit of levity now and then.

Benghazi was supposed to be the big October Surprise that would win the White House for Mitt Romney. Eventually, you guys are going to have to come to grips with the fact that it was a failure and just get over it. There never was any "there" there.
Click to expand...


Make that four times.

Your definition of "ignore" must be different than most peoples.
 
I can fully participate in a thread while simultaneously ignoring the stupidity of my fellow posters. Happens all the time.

Carry on...
 
George/Dick/Rummy's case for war in Iraq, was a pack-o-lies. Boy-o-boy, when the people find about THIS, there's no WAY George'll be reelected come 2004!
 
zzigzzag said:
Make that three out of four of your own posts on your own thread.

Now back to Benghazi.....
Click to expand...


Actually, this is Boltlady's thread. And I made no claims of ignoring it.

Of course, that's reality, and thus has no place in your universe.
 
Zam-Zam said:
Actually, this is Boltlady's thread. And I made no claims of ignoring it.

Of course, that's reality, and thus has no place in your universe.
Click to expand...
I stand corrected on whose thread it was. Your pasted post was just the longest when I scrolled up.

Nonetheless, you wrote three out of four of your posts complaining about what you were doing in those very posts.

Irony is a conservative value.
 
"The people" love themselves a good hate-angle or scandal, but the more times you've got rewrite it to make it even remotely plausible, the less seriously they take it and the more they start thinkin' it's a sad joke on the shouters.
 
fairsheet said:
"The people" love themselves a good hate-angle or scandal, but the more times you've got rewrite it to make it even remotely plausible, the less seriously they take it and the more they start thinkin' it's a sad joke on the shouters.
Click to expand...
Zam's pasted article begins, "Lawmakers are speculating...."

Good enough for gospel in winger world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top