Biden's Radical Gun Laws on his Website

[Mr. Friscus]

So, nobody is talking about Biden's policy in the media. Nobody.. zilch. It's all "Trump must go".. "Trump is bad"...

If you go to Biden's own website, you'll find He wants to

1. End the online sale of firearms and ammunitions. Biden will enact legislation to prohibit all online sales of firearms, ammunition, kits, and gun parts.​

Given that it's a way to have a paper trail ensured, this is weird. And many people who want ammo and guns that are capable of defending themselves have to venture online. So, this will heavily restrict access to your right to the 2nd amendment.

2. Close the “hate crime loophole.” Biden will enact legislation prohibiting an individual “who has been convicted of a misdemeanor hate crime, or received an enhanced sentence for a misdemeanor because of hate or bias in its commission” from purchasing or possessing a firearm​

This sounds fine and dandy by a cliche title, but given what a "misdemeanor hate crime" has been defined by from the left, it's kinda creepy. Basically, anyone who gets in trouble for saying a slur or holding the wrong political viewpoint has been charged with "misdemeanor hate crimes" before. So, this can easily be weaponized to ensure those who are on the wrong side of the aisle don't get guns.

3. Hold adults accountable for giving minors access to firearms. Biden supports legislation holding adults criminally and civilly liable for directly or negligently giving a minor access to a firearm, regardless of whether the minor actually gains possession of the firearm.​

So what does this mean? It's not crazy to think that if you have a child in the house, and a gun isn't locked away in a safe, you can be charged with a crime. If you have a gun by your bed to defend your home, that can be called a crime by this policy. So, this can be a way to criminalize normal behavior of owning a gun, taking guns from people who are using guns in an expected, regular manner.

Again, nobody is talking about his, and it's by design. I had no idea. This type of gun control isn't going to win Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, etc. So, the media is ignoring the discussion entirely. Notice, the media isn't looking at Biden's policies at all. 0% exposure and 0% critique. Democrats largely probably don't even know why they're voting for him other than he's not Trump, and middle-of-the-road voters likely have no idea how radical Biden's policies are.

And, this is clearly by design.

 

[Michigander]

That all sounds very sensible to me. In fact, it doesn't go far enough. There should also be a permanent ban on assault rifles and high capacity magazines.
In fact, private citizens really don't need any thing except traditional hunting rifles and shotguns.

This weird and absurd notion that we need some kind of citizen's army to protect us from a tyrannical government or in case the British come sailing back in wooden ships to reclaim their colonial assets is 1000% bullshit. It is a pretext used by perverted little freaks that are terrified of their own shadows to arm themselves to the teeth because they couldn't get a date.

Fact is, we have a "well regulated militia"... we call it "The National Guard". They're awesome when there's a flood or something.

And no one wants to infringe on anyone's right to keep and bear a saber or musket in the spirit in which the 2nd Amendment was written.... because ...you ..know... the British are still out there.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

That all sounds very sensible to me.

That doesn't surprise me.

There should also be a permanent ban on assault rifles and high capacity magazines.

The policy in the 90's didn't do jack, so while it might make you feel better, it doesn't result in any improvements. Facts over feelings.

This weird and absurd notion that we need some kind of citizen's army to protect us from a tyrannical government or in case the British come sailing back in wooden ships to reclaim their colonial assets is 1000% bullshit. It is a pretext used by perverted little freaks that are terrified of their own shadows to arm themselves to the teeth because they couldn't get a date.

You are hilariously insecure in this statement. It's pathetic. If you don't want a gun, don't buy one. I don't own one. But rights are rights. You stay angry and triggered (no pun intended).. it's so prevalent in leftist expectations. A happy populace votes Republican, so you need to get pissed off. Go ahead... get emotional.

Fact is, we have a "well regulated militia"... we call it "The National Guard". They're awesome when there's a flood or something.

The National Guard is controlled by the government. We need the populace to have some sort of power to resist against when totalitarians, like you and the leftists in the Democrat party, come try to take things that by definition aren't yours to take, no matter how you try to spin it.

 

[UPNYA2]

That all sounds very sensible to me. In fact, it doesn't go far enough. There should also be a permanent ban on assault rifles and high capacity magazines.
In fact, private citizens really don't need any thing except traditional hunting rifles and shotguns.

This weird and absurd notion that we need some kind of citizen's army to protect us from a tyrannical government or in case the British come sailing back in wooden ships to reclaim their colonial assets is 1000% bullshit. It is a pretext used by perverted little freaks that are terrified of their own shadows to arm themselves to the teeth because they couldn't get a date.

Fact is, we have a "well regulated militia"... we call it "The National Guard". They're awesome when there's a flood or something.

And no one wants to infringe on anyone's right to keep and bear a saber or musket in the spirit in which the 2nd Amendment was written.... because ...you ..know... the British are still out there.

"private citizens really don't need any thing except traditional hunting rifles and shotguns."

Perhaps.

But that is the annoying part about our rights to so many left leaning individuals, our rights aren't based upon what another feels everyone "needs". Also of note, the desire to restrict and limit our rights almost always and only pertain to the 2ad amendment which guarantees that people can bear arms, not so much the others.

Lets take the freedom of the press part of the 1st amendment for an example.

Among other things it prohibits any laws that abridge the freedom of speech or infringe upon the freedom of the press. Now lets say that for the sake of argument some feel that this means private citizens really don't need any thing except traditional speech and the traditional press, you know, in the spirit in which the 1st Amendment was written.

Stump speeches and town hall meetings were the types of free speech the framers were dealing with, old fashioned block letter placement printing presses were used to create newspapers, books and pamphlets at the time, so, like your reference to sabers and muskets, these speeches and press types from back in the day should be all anyone is guaranteed.

Therefore, using this exact, for lack of an actual accurate word, "logic", if there should also be a permanent ban assault rifles and high capacity magazines because they are far more efficient at what they do and could be used to hurt more people faster than the guns of yesteryear, there should also be a ban radio, tv, social media and high speed internet for exactly the same reasons.

Agreed?

 

[Michigander]

LOL! Jesus! I knew that was coming.
Fact is, I personally don't give a rat's ass. I have owned plenty of guns in my life. For me, the issue is just screwing the gun nuts because it's so fun to watch them yammering on about "the Constitution". The best are those fat drunken "militia" fools that dress-up in camouflage and wheeze around in the woods pretending they are soldiers. So, like I said, there's no reason anyone should have a gun unless they are a soldier or a cop.

 

[Michigander]

That doesn't surprise me.

The policy in the 90's didn't do jack, so while it might make you feel better, it doesn't result in any improvements. Facts over feelings.

You are hilariously insecure in this statement. It's pathetic. If you don't want a gun, don't buy one. I don't own one. But rights are rights. You stay angry and triggered (no pun intended).. it's so prevalent in leftist expectations. A happy populace votes Republican, so you need to get pissed off. Go ahead... get emotional.

The National Guard is controlled by the government. We need the populace to have some sort of power to resist against when totalitarians, like you and the leftists in the Democrat party, come try to take things that by definition aren't yours to take, no matter how you try to spin it.

Gee. I'm going to sleep so much better knowing that you and your little friends are protecting us all against the National Guard! I'm sure their tanks are no match for your AR. Good luck with all that, Doris!

I'm all-set up here on the plane of reality.

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

Item 1 would essentially end gun and ammo sales in the US.

98% of ammo purchases in the US are online.

violates the 2nd amendment.

 

[Michigander]

Item 1 would essentially end gun and ammo sales in the US.

98% of ammo purchases in the US are online.

violates the 2nd amendment.

If a person is too drunk or too stupid to take a bus to Walmart to buy bullets, they probably shouldn't have them.

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

If a person is too drunk or stupid too take a bus to Walmart to buy bullets, they probably shouldn't have them.

if a person is too drunk or stupid to know that many Walmart's no longer sell anything but shotgun shells, then perhaps they should not post.

 

[UPNYA2]

LOL! Jesus! I knew that was coming.
Fact is, I personally don't give a rat's ass. I have owned plenty of guns in my life. For me, the issue is just screwing the gun nuts because it's so fun to watch them yammering on about "the Constitution". The best are those fat drunken "militia" fools that dress-up in camouflage and wheeze around in the woods pretending they are soldiers. So, like I said, there's no reason anyone should have a gun unless they are a soldier or a cop.

" like I said, there's no reason anyone should have a gun unless they are a soldier or a cop."

Lucky for us you were not given the authority to grant all US citizens our rights, huh?

 

[Michigander]

Thank God for the "patriots" ! LOL!

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Item 1 would essentially end gun and ammo sales in the US.

98% of ammo purchases in the US are online.

violates the 2nd amendment.

Wow, if that stat is true... yea, it's radical policy..

Which nobody even knows about much less talks about. How can such radical policy go under the radar? I guess when the media devotes 98% of their coverage of how bad Trump is, and don't actually cover the election.. this happens.

 

[RickWA]

That all sounds very sensible to me. In fact, it doesn't go far enough. There should also be a permanent ban on assault rifles and high capacity magazines.
In fact, private citizens really don't need any thing except traditional hunting rifles and shotguns.

This weird and absurd notion that we need some kind of citizen's army to protect us from a tyrannical government or in case the British come sailing back in wooden ships to reclaim their colonial assets is 1000% bullshit. It is a pretext used by perverted little freaks that are terrified of their own shadows to arm themselves to the teeth because they couldn't get a date.

Fact is, we have a "well regulated militia"... we call it "The National Guard". They're awesome when there's a flood or something.

And no one wants to infringe on anyone's right to keep and bear a saber or musket in the spirit in which the 2nd Amendment was written.... because ...you ..know... the British are still out there.

Geeze. You only tried to maintain the lie that you are merely anti-Trump and are actually a Republican for like...two days? Now you are all-in on socialism AND removal of gun rights.

Very, VERY extremist radical lefty Democrat. VERY.