What is the purpose of blame?
Is it a way to vent anger at some mishap?
Is it something that is needed if one wants to sue and get rich off of someone's "fault"?
I don't get it. Sometimes you need to find out what caused an incident so that you don't repeat the same error and fail again. But that's "cause". In finding the cause for something there doesn't have to be blame.
To me, pointing out blame is a way to lash out at someone or something and utterly destroy its worth. It does nothing but make one person feel righteous and another feel worthless. What good is that?
So for the last month, Democrats have been blaming one thing after another. One person or persons after the other for Hillary's loss. Not once has Hillary been blamed. Not even once. So it's obvious that either she is searching for some faulty someone other than herself, or other people are searching for that faulty someone other than Hillary (and and to keep that finger from pointing at them).
But why do that tortured task?
It won't get the crown for Hillary. It won't make people like her more. It won't fix anything. On the other hand, making that finger point away from one's self might keep flying objects off of one's head (hurled by Hillary of course). But it seems that just about everyone has had a turn at being blamed.
I picture it as a long line of idiots coming forth to grovel at the feet of the soiled queen to be lambasted by her until she's tired of it and then says "next". Each person slithers away, utterly destroyed. But the queen feels better for berating everyone whose fault it is for her loss.
Is that, then, what it's all about?
Is it a way to vent anger at some mishap?
Is it something that is needed if one wants to sue and get rich off of someone's "fault"?
I don't get it. Sometimes you need to find out what caused an incident so that you don't repeat the same error and fail again. But that's "cause". In finding the cause for something there doesn't have to be blame.
To me, pointing out blame is a way to lash out at someone or something and utterly destroy its worth. It does nothing but make one person feel righteous and another feel worthless. What good is that?
So for the last month, Democrats have been blaming one thing after another. One person or persons after the other for Hillary's loss. Not once has Hillary been blamed. Not even once. So it's obvious that either she is searching for some faulty someone other than herself, or other people are searching for that faulty someone other than Hillary (and and to keep that finger from pointing at them).
But why do that tortured task?
It won't get the crown for Hillary. It won't make people like her more. It won't fix anything. On the other hand, making that finger point away from one's self might keep flying objects off of one's head (hurled by Hillary of course). But it seems that just about everyone has had a turn at being blamed.
I picture it as a long line of idiots coming forth to grovel at the feet of the soiled queen to be lambasted by her until she's tired of it and then says "next". Each person slithers away, utterly destroyed. But the queen feels better for berating everyone whose fault it is for her loss.
Is that, then, what it's all about?
