New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

BleachBit??

Jen said:
There.
WAS.
INTENT.
Click to expand...
Absolute intent, engineered intent, intentions upon intentions upon intentions, a whole web of intentions, designed to operate the biggest pay to play racket in history... you don't fall into that by accident, it takes a lot of intent...
 
Jen said:
Well. I hope they film it when that Cow (Hillary) turns herself inside out.........it's starting.
I was about to write that B word that gets deleted around here........ I'll just say it a different way (about Hillary):
Witch.
Click to expand...
I use the word "battleaxe." It's a weapon of war so it's probably safe (as a word) and reminds me of The Flintstones.

Which is a good thing.
 
Days said:
Absolute intent, engineered intent, intentions upon intentions upon intentions, a whole web of intentions, designed to operate the biggest pay to play racket in history... you don't fall into that by accident, it takes a lot of intent...
Click to expand...
Comey is a Loser and a Coward to have done what he did.
 
Wow, that is really scary. At least Bleachbit is enjoying the free advertising.

Jonathan Zdziarski, a computer security expert, characterized BleachBit as a fairly "amateur" tool that doesn't raise any red flags.

"It looks like the type of tool someone would run who's conscious of cleaning old crud off their system," Zdziarski said. "Someone trying to cover their tracks would likely pay for and use a much more expensive, specialized data destruction tool."

Andrew Ziem, the developer behind BleachBit, wrote in a blog post that the service "has not been served a warrant or subpoena in relation to the investigation."

"BleachBit is free of charge to use in any environment whether it is personal, commercial, educational, and government, and the cleaning process is not reversible," Ziem said in the post on BleachBit's website.

That said, Ziem also noted that BleachBit's web traffic "spiked" after Gowdy's comments.

The Clinton campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/26/technology/hillary-clinton-bleachbit/index.html
 
Hey, maybe now the open source guys will build a new commercial version and call it Clintonbit. There's billions to be made guys.
 
Wahbooz said:
Wow, that is really scary.
Click to expand...

Yes it is...very scary.

Jonathan Zdziarski, a computer security expert, characterized BleachBit as a fairly "amateur" tool that doesn't raise any red flags.

"It looks like the type of tool someone would run who's conscious of cleaning old crud off their system," Zdziarski said. "Someone trying to cover their tracks would likely pay for and use a much more expensive, specialized data destruction tool."
Click to expand...

Not likely her legal team has a computer security expert, nor would the team want to raise red flags. Yet somehow the amateurs' tool was discovered, raising a red flag, otherwise we wouldn't be talking about it. And why shell out for a much more expensive, specialized data destruction tool when the free one got the job done?

As for her legal team, there's something very puzzling here. They are the ones who attempted to destroy the evidence, not her. The guy who set up the server in the first place was granted immunity. He was very very important to the investigators. We know who he is. We know what he went through. Why don't we know anything about her team? They are the ones I'd focus on if I were trying to get to the bottom of this. So who are they? Does Director Comey or Loretta Lynch want to know? Do they care? Do they not want to interview them? Have they interviewed them? Apparently not!

There is only one way to go with this. Logic suggests that if this cover-up is not a vast conspiracy of willing conspirators, then it has to be coercion, threats, bribes, or blackmail, for some unholy national purpose, at the highest level of government. One or the other.. Take your pick.

The Clinton campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Click to expand...

That speaks for itself.
 
Days said:
Hillary was long used to operating pay to play, so she had her system set up in advance of her SecOfState position, she knew she was going to delete those e-mails when the heat came and she had all those plans ready in advance also. She probably had all her excuses made up in advance also.
Click to expand...

Have you ever considered there was more involved than just deleting pay to play, yoga, and wedding plan emails?

Like maybe something related to national security, money laundering, etc.

There had to be something in there that would rock the nation. Something so very serious as to cause Director Comey to put a lid on it anyway he could, no matter how contrived and awkward it appeared.
 
Boca said:
Have you ever considered there was more involved than just deleting pay to play, yoga, and wedding plan emails?

Like maybe something related to national security, money laundering, etc.

There had to be something in there that would rock the nation. Something so very serious as to cause Director Comey to put a lid on it anyway he could, no matter how contrived and awkward it appeared.
Click to expand...
He probably was promised the same treatment if he did not play along as John Roberts was promised.

Everyone wants to live to see their grandchildren.
 
Boca said:
Have you ever considered there was more involved than just deleting pay to play, yoga, and wedding plan emails?

Like maybe something related to national security, money laundering, etc.

There had to be something in there that would rock the nation. Something so very serious as to cause Director Comey to put a lid on it anyway he could, no matter how contrived and awkward it appeared.
Click to expand...
funny you should mention that. Hillary the NWO princess was run by the globalists for New York Senator, even though she had never lived there or any where close to there, had no connections, except to Wall Street, it was the most obvious plant in our government since Herbert Hoover was made president (after two decades abroad working for the Dutch super rich). So who was really about to become the next Senator from New York?

The cabal kills the real candidate and patches in Hillary. Hillary has a bunch of skeletons like that in her closet, you can bet she was selling US secrets, it wasn't just pay to play, it was outright treason... the witch should be burned at the stake.

 
Boca said:
Yes it is...very scary.



Not likely her legal team has a computer security expert, nor would the team want to raise red flags. Yet somehow the amateurs' tool was discovered, raising a red flag, otherwise we wouldn't be talking about it. And why shell out for a much more expensive, specialized data destruction tool when the free one got the job done?

As for her legal team, there's something very puzzling here. They are the ones who attempted to destroy the evidence, not her. The guy who set up the server in the first place was granted immunity. He was very very important to the investigators. We know who he is. We know what he went through. Why don't we know anything about her team? They are the ones I'd focus on if I were trying to get to the bottom of this. So who are they? Does Director Comey or Loretta Lynch want to know? Do they care? Do they not want to interview them? Have they interviewed them? Apparently not!

There is only one way to go with this. Logic suggests that if this cover-up is not a vast conspiracy of willing conspirators, then it has to be coercion, threats, bribes, or blackmail, for some unholy national purpose, at the highest level of government. One or the other.. Take your pick.



That speaks for itself.
Click to expand...
Clinton publicly confessed to sharing secrets with 10 lawyers who didn't have the clearance to view those secrets. Publicly confessed to the crime.

FBI refused to act on it.
 
Wolfert Webber said:
He probably was promised the same treatment if he did not play along as John Roberts was promised.

Everyone wants to live to see their grandchildren.
Click to expand...

My take on Roberts is he was blackmailed. He and his wife arranged to adopt a couple of Irish children by having them transported to South America....illegal under Irish law.
 
Wahbooz said:
Wow, that is really scary. At least Bleachbit is enjoying the free advertising.

Jonathan Zdziarski, a computer security expert, characterized BleachBit as a fairly "amateur" tool that doesn't raise any red flags.

"It looks like the type of tool someone would run who's conscious of cleaning old crud off their system," Zdziarski said. "Someone trying to cover their tracks would likely pay for and use a much more expensive, specialized data destruction tool."

Andrew Ziem, the developer behind BleachBit, wrote in a blog post that the service "has not been served a warrant or subpoena in relation to the investigation."

"BleachBit is free of charge to use in any environment whether it is personal, commercial, educational, and government, and the cleaning process is not reversible," Ziem said in the post on BleachBit's website.

That said, Ziem also noted that BleachBit's web traffic "spiked" after Gowdy's comments.

The Clinton campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/26/technology/hillary-clinton-bleachbit/index.html
Click to expand...

I hope Mr. Zdziarski continues to stay healthy.
 
Boca said:
Yes it is...very scary.



Not likely her legal team has a computer security expert, nor would the team want to raise red flags. Yet somehow the amateurs' tool was discovered, raising a red flag, otherwise we wouldn't be talking about it. And why shell out for a much more expensive, specialized data destruction tool when the free one got the job done?

As for her legal team, there's something very puzzling here. They are the ones who attempted to destroy the evidence, not her. The guy who set up the server in the first place was granted immunity. He was very very important to the investigators. We know who he is. We know what he went through. Why don't we know anything about her team? They are the ones I'd focus on if I were trying to get to the bottom of this. So who are they? Does Director Comey or Loretta Lynch want to know? Do they care? Do they not want to interview them? Have they interviewed them? Apparently not!

There is only one way to go with this. Logic suggests that if this cover-up is not a vast conspiracy of willing conspirators, then it has to be coercion, threats, bribes, or blackmail, for some unholy national purpose, at the highest level of government. One or the other.. Take your pick.



That speaks for itself.
Click to expand...

It doesn't scare me. If Clinton and her IT guy are foolish enough to use something that is slightly more than a disk cleaner to clean the hard drive, and they have something to hide, they're not exactly the sharpest pencils in the box. And that being the case, I seriously doubt much has been successfully hidden from forensic eyes. You can accept what the security expert says or not, really doesn't much matter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top