New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Bombshell !

Spamature said:
@The Thinker Told you I would let you know when the next one dropped.


US' top diplomat Taylor was told Trump wanted aid withheld until Ukraine said it would investigate Biden


So what now ?

Do you Trumpies pretend it's not happening ?

Do you pretend it's a deep state plot ?

Or do you accept the fact that you support and defend a criminal and traitor ?
Click to expand...

Ah, part of the closed door interrogation of Trump officials that we only find out about through democrat leaks.

Got it :)

I'll wait to see what really happened.
 
  • marvin martian said:
    Until a vote is held in the House (which it won't be because the Democrats are chickenshit losers) there is no "impeachment inquiry", there is only Adam Schiff's illegal Star Chamber. Hike up your skirts and hold the vote!
    Click to expand...
Utter nonsense.

Pay attention.

No vote is required to open an impeachment inquiry.

The vote is required at the end.

Those are simply the facts
 
The Thinker said:
Will there be an end?
Click to expand...
Yes.

At the end of the house impeachment inquiry the full house will vote out articles of impeachment; or not.

If the House does not pass articles of impeachment it is over.

If they do, the senate has a trial on said articles, and at the end votes on conviction/ removal.

Basic American civics.

The question is why don't you already know all this? Your country deserves more effort.
 
FakeName said:
Yes.

At the end of the house impeachment inquiry the full house will vote out articles of impeachment; or not.

If the House does not pass articles of impeachment it is over.

If they do, the senate has a trial on said articles, and at the end votes on conviction/ removal.

Basic American civics.

The question is why don't you already know all this? Your country deserves more effort.
Click to expand...


Actually the senate will dismiss it on lack of evidence.

BUT since the democrats are violating the rules- they already cooked their own goose.

ALL House members are entitled to material democrats are hiding.

Adam Schiff isn't allowing Reps. to see the transcripts from this impeachment inquiry, but selectively leaks small portions to the press.
This process should be transparent to the American people.
It should be a fair process w/ clear rules, just like past impeachment inquiries.


HouseRulesScreenGrab2.jpg

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/HMAN-116/pdf/HMAN-116.pdf
 
EatTheRich said:
https://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/

No, I know it did.
Click to expand...

LOL ! Really ? It was a scam exposed long ago.


https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-foundation-donations/
If the Clinton Foundation was as good as defenders claimed, why did all its big-time donors suddenly lose interest? The only reasonable explanation is that donors weren't interested in what the foundation supposedly did for humanity. They were interested in the political favors they knew their money would buy.
 
Nutty Cortez said:
LOL ! Really ? It was a scam exposed long ago.


https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/clinton-foundation-donations/
If the Clinton Foundation was as good as defenders claimed, why did all its big-time donors suddenly lose interest? The only reasonable explanation is that donors weren't interested in what the foundation supposedly did for humanity. They were interested in the political favors they knew their money would buy.
Click to expand...

They have consistently been rated as one of the most transparent and honestly run charities with among the least overhead by every independent organization that rates charities. 89% of their revenue went to charity. None of your unsupported innuendo changes that.
 
EatTheRich said:
They have consistently been rated as one of the most transparent and honestly run charities with among the least overhead by every independent organization that rates charities. 89% of their revenue went to charity. None of your unsupported innuendo changes that.
Click to expand...

Wow, you're such a sucker. Enjoy that eau de Clinton bath water.
 
Spamature said:
@The Thinker Told you I would let you know when the next one dropped.


US' top diplomat Taylor was told Trump wanted aid withheld until Ukraine said it would investigate Biden


So what now ?

Do you Trumpies pretend it's not happening ?

Do you pretend it's a deep state plot ?

Or do you accept the fact that you support and defend a criminal and traitor ?
Click to expand...

Oh please. "Was told" is second hand information at best. Not admissible in a trial.
Two, turns out this guy sat on the board of Burissma too. Whoopsie. And he met with Schiff's aids before he testified. Not exactly an impartial witness, is he?
Finally, diplomatic quid pro quo is how things get done, is used by virtually every government entity, and above all: ISN'T A CRIME. Anywhere. And you don't want it to be.
This is another nothing burger.
 
Since the Republicans on the committees that are deposing Bill Taylor and several other witnesses have leaked NOTHING, it's evident that Republicans have heard NOTHING that would make Trump look not guilty.
 
SoccerMom said:
Oh please. "Was told" is second hand information at best. Not admissible in a trial.
Two, turns out this guy sat on the board of Burissma too. Whoopsie. And he met with Schiff's aids before he testified. Not exactly an impartial witness, is he?
Finally, diplomatic quid pro quo is how things get done, is used by virtually every government entity, and above all: ISN'T A CRIME. Anywhere. And you don't want it to be.
This is another nothing burger.
Click to expand...

The issue is that the thing he wanted done was a personal political favor, not something for the U.S.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top