New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Calling on all Hollyweirdos.

Any actor, grip, stage hand, assistant, cook, janitor or anyone else that made any money from a Harvey Weinstein movie, should donate the entire amount to charity. Practice what you preach you bunch of phony leftists.
 
Any actor, grip, stage hand, assistant, cook, janitor or anyone else that made any money from a Harvey Weinstein movie, should donate the entire amount to charity. Practice what you preach you bunch of phony leftists.

Should all of Trump's employees also donate their money to charity?

After all, Trump has been accused of the same things, and Trump has admitted to such conduct.
 
why? its a crime to work for a sexual harasser?

half the congressional pages/interns would be both victims and enablers then.
 
What does that have to do with Harvey Weinstein?

See if you can find the common ground...

Any, grip, stage hand, assistant, cook, janitor or anyone else that made any money from a Bill O'Reilly show, should donate the entire amount to charity. Practice what you preach you bunch of phony righties.
 
See if you can find the common ground...

Any, grip, stage hand, assistant, cook, janitor or anyone else that made any money from a Bill O'Reilly show, should donate the entire amount to charity. Practice what you preach you bunch of phony righties.
This post is not about Bill. It is about Weinstein
 
This post is not about Bill. It is about Weinstein

Not really, it's about the concept of restitution from workers who assisted in making the product of a sexual harasser. Those workers may or may not have known a thing.

However, for some reason, you limit the concept of restitution by these workers to one person and one person only, when the subject of sexual harassment is currently a hot topic on many fronts.

So, if you believe such restitution is due from Weinstein's workers, doesn't it simply make sense to believe in it on all fronts and with all harassers?
 
Bill Oreilly should donate his entire salary to charity.
Making a pass at a woman (sexual harassment) is not the same as being a sexual predator, like Weinstein. I'll bet both you and BM (interesting initials, no?) have made more passes at women than O'Reilly.
 
Making a pass at a woman (sexual harassment) is not the same as being a sexual predator, like Weinstein. I'll bet both you and BM (interesting initials, no?) have made more passes at women than O'Reilly.

32 million for "making a pass"??? Please.
 
What's your "theory" of what happened?

You're the one who is absurdly and incorrectly conflating making a pass with sexual harassment. These are, quite simply, not the same.

My theory is that O'Reilly kicked in 32 million to the woman because he didn't want the sexual harassment to become headlines and maybe cost him his job.

What's your theory on O'Reilly's total of 45 million dollars in payouts?
 
Last edited:
You're the one who is absurdly and incorrectly conflating making a pass with sexual harassment. These are, quite simply, not the same.

My theory is that O'Reilly kicked in 32 million to the woman because he didn't want the sexual harassment to become headlines and maybe cost him his job.

What's your theory on O'Reilly's total of 45 million dollars in payouts?

You're theory doesn't make sense. The sexual harassment DID become headlines and it DID cost him his job. He probably paid it so he wasn't prosecuted and would have to be listed as a sexual predator! Although I think he still got raked over the coals.....
 
You're theory doesn't make sense. The sexual harassment DID become headlines and it DID cost him his job. He probably paid it so he wasn't prosecuted and would have to be listed as a sexual predator! Although I think he still got raked over the coals.....

My theory makes sense. His attempt failed.

Actually, Fox signed him to a 25 million contract and they knew about it, so, no, it didn't cost him his job, initially.

Last January, six months after Fox News ousted its chairman amid a sexual harassment scandal, the network’s top-rated host at the time, Bill O’Reilly, struck a $32 million agreement with a longtime network analyst to settle new sexual harassment allegations, according to two people briefed on the matter — an extraordinarily large amount for such cases.

Although the deal has not been previously made public, the network’s parent company, 21st Century Fox, acknowledges that it was aware of the woman’s complaints about Mr. O’Reilly. They included allegations of repeated harassment, a nonconsensual sexual relationship and the sending of gay pornography and other sexually explicit material to her, according to the people briefed on the matter.

It was at least the sixth agreement — and by far the largest — made by either Mr. O’Reilly or the company to settle harassment allegations against him...


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/21/business/media/bill-oreilly-sexual-harassment.html
 
Billo was accused of assault and nonconsensual sex according to the reports. That's a tad worse than "making a pass."

https://www.mediamatters.org/resear...enigration-and-harassment-of-Lis-Wiehl/218301
Wow! Media Matters. LOL After reading the entire thing, I can't help but wonder why she didn't either complain or quit working with him. Gosh, it was so TERRIBLE!! Nonconsensual sex sounds like rape to me...however, she didn't mention that part. Hmmm....curious.

January: O’Reilly made a massive payout in response to reported “repeated harassment” and a “nonconsensual sexual relationship.”
 
Any actor, grip, stage hand, assistant, cook, janitor or anyone else that made any money from a Harvey Weinstein movie, should donate the entire amount to charity. Practice what you preach you bunch of phony leftists.

While they're at it

Any actor, grip, stage hand, assistant, cook, janitor or anyone else who worked on The Apprentice. Don't donate your money. Donate your Trump stories and or recordings of Trump's sexual harassment and or racist outburst and intentional slights.
 
Back
Top