New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Christie wins Quinnipiac's heat index

Bo-4

Bo-4

Senator
Funny, he scores low among Pugs, but high among Indies and Dems. As i've been saying for the last year, he's the only guy with a chance to win yet that seems like the lowest Republican priority in recent years. It's about PRINCIPLES. & PURITY! :)

Which is fine, because running against Goober Cruz, The Idiot Paul Son, Creepy Munster Kid or Snotty Walker would be a wet dream!

"Christie's great strength is among independent voters, who give him 50.6 degrees of love, and Democrats, who give him 53.2 degrees," Brown said. "His rating on the Thermometer scale is a good indication of what may face him should he travel the 2016 campaign trail. His tougher problem may be winning the GOP nomination because in most states only registered Republicans are able to vote in party primaries," said Brown.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institute...titute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1932
 
Saw a discussion on MSNBC (Boo! Hiss! Al Sharpton!!!!!....well, no... actually it was Lawrence O'Donnell. But still Boo! Hiss! BOO!!!!!)....on Christie's moves and how he could position himself for a 2016 run.


If the Hard Righties run several candidates...Cruz, Rubio, Rand, Ryan...and SPLIT the vote of the Hard Right/Tea Partyers.....Kristie-Kreme could "pull a Romney"...i.e. win on PLURALITY wins in the Primaries as the "Moderate Choice", just as Mitt did.

Backed by the Big Money, he could then crush any "Newt" or "Santorum" that threatened him, by running negative TV ads against them and before the Tea Partyers could re-group for a "Anybody But Chris" candidate....Christie would already have the delegate count locked up and be inevitable.....again, just like Mitt did.

Any Righty who attacks him on Sandy relief money.....like Rand, he points out how their State gets more Federal money back than they put in....or how their State got Federal disaster relief.

Then suddenly the guy that the Right would be saying in 2015 "If he becomes the Nominee, I'm voting Libertarian" (like they did with Romney in 2011).....is their Nominee and they are FORCED to love and defend him....again, just like Romney. :)
 
GordonGecko said:
Saw a discussion on MSNBC (Boo! Hiss! Al Sharpton!!!!!....well, no... actually it was Lawrence O'Donnell. But still Boo! Hiss! BOO!!!!!)....on Christie's moves and how he could position himself for a 2016 run.

If the Hard Righties run several candidates...Cruz, Rubio, Rand, Ryan...and SPLIT the vote of the Hard Right/Tea Partyers.....Kristie-Kreme could "pull a Romney"...i.e. win on PLURALITY wins in the Primaries as the "Moderate Choice", just as Mitt did.

Backed by the Big Money, he could then crush any "Newt" or "Santorum" that threatened him, by running negative TV ads against them and before the Tea Partyers could re-group for a "Anybody But Chris" candidate....Christie would already have the delegate count locked up and be inevitable.....again, just like Mitt did.

Any Righty who attacks him on Sandy relief money.....like Rand, he points out how their State gets more Federal money back than they put in....or how their State got Federal disaster relief.

Then suddenly the guy that the Right would be saying in 2015 "If he becomes the Nominee, I'm voting Libertarian" (like they did with Romney in 2011).....is their Nominee and they are FORCED to love and defend him....again, just like Romney. :)
Click to expand...

That makes total sense.. ride the Romney Train to the nomination! Then again, wonder how many Republican purists will buy into the notion that Chris has the best chance of winning after that schtick went sour in 2012?
 
Bo-4 said:
That makes total sense.. ride the Romney Train to the nomination! Then again, wonder how many Republican purists will buy into the notion that Chris has the best chance of winning after that schtick went sour in 2012?
Click to expand...


The panel noted that TWICE before (McCain, Romney. I'd throw in Dubya and "compassionate conservatism" and Bob Dole to make it FOUR times).....the "RINO" or more moderate Republican won the Nomination over some "pure conservative".

So why would the Tea Partyers believe Christie couldn't do it. Mind you, Christie's no liberal...except compared to a wackadoodle like Calgary Cruz or "Ron Paul Junior".

But if the "pure conservatives" are SPLIT...then there are still enough Mr. Friscus or trapdoor SANE Republicans out there who know looneys when they see them...and will support Christie.

((Uh-oh, now Frisky and trap are going to get in trouble...I called them "sane". :) ))
 
GordonGecko said:
Saw a discussion on MSNBC (Boo! Hiss! Al Sharpton!!!!!....well, no... actually it was Lawrence O'Donnell. But still Boo! Hiss! BOO!!!!!)....on Christie's moves and how he could position himself for a 2016 run.


If the Hard Righties run several candidates...Cruz, Rubio, Rand, Ryan...and SPLIT the vote of the Hard Right/Tea Partyers.....Kristie-Kreme could "pull a Romney"...i.e. win on PLURALITY wins in the Primaries as the "Moderate Choice", just as Mitt did.

Backed by the Big Money, he could then crush any "Newt" or "Santorum" that threatened him, by running negative TV ads against them and before the Tea Partyers could re-group for a "Anybody But Chris" candidate....Christie would already have the delegate count locked up and be inevitable.....again, just like Mitt did.

Any Righty who attacks him on Sandy relief money.....like Rand, he points out how their State gets more Federal money back than they put in....or how their State got Federal disaster relief.

Then suddenly the guy that the Right would be saying in 2015 "If he becomes the Nominee, I'm voting Libertarian" (like they did with Romney in 2011).....is their Nominee and they are FORCED to love and defend him....again, just like Romney. :)
Click to expand...

Republican vs....murderer Killery...doesnt look good for you at all.
 
marvin martian said:
Ask Hillary, she was the original birther, or did you forget that? I know she's a woman and all, but she's not a Republican, so she must actually exist, right Gordo?
Click to expand...


marv....what is your opinion of Birtherism? You think it's a "smear job", right?


(Watch...he can't answer, without risking making potential "allies" mad. Boca, Jack, the Usual Suspects for sure.)
 
GordonGecko said:
marv....what is your opinion of Birtherism? You think it's a "smear job", right?


(Watch...he can't answer, without risking making potential "allies" mad. Boca, Jack, the Usual Suspects for sure.)
Click to expand...

You answer my question first, then I'll answer yours. Do you acknowledge that Hillary Clinton was the first significant public figure to raise the birther issue?
 
marvin martian said:
You answer my question first, then I'll answer yours. Do you acknowledge that Hillary Clinton was the first significant public figure to raise the birther issue?
Click to expand...


No. I don't. Let's see your proof.

Now that I've answered.....answer mine, while you check your archives.

Do you think Birtherism is a "smear job"...as you so often attribute to it when it comes up???
 
GordonGecko said:
No. I don't. Let's see your proof.

Now that I've answered.....answer mine, while you check your archives.

Do you think Birtherism is a "smear job"...as you so often attribute to it when it comes up???
Click to expand...

No, I don't think birtherism is a "smear job" per se, but it's an open question, initially raised by Hillary Clinton's campaign, that wasn't answered satisfactorily for a lot of people...including Hillary Clinton, apparently.
 
GordonGecko said:
Surprise, surprise. When he accuses Hillary of it...it's a "smear job".

When he risks pissing off Birther "allies"...it's "not a smear per se".

Thanks, marv...for proving my point.
Click to expand...

Sorry, you lost me. Why don't you stick to Republican men, I think you get a little confused when you're off your sweet spot...

I don't ever recall making up my mind conclusively about the birther thing. Check your creepy archive and confirm it for me please...
 
Bo-4 said:
Funny, he scores low among Pugs, but high among Indies and Dems. As i've been saying for the last year, he's the only guy with a chance to win yet that seems like the lowest Republican priority in recent years. It's about PRINCIPLES. & PURITY! :)

Which is fine, because running against Goober Cruz, The Idiot Paul Son, Creepy Munster Kid or Snotty Walker would be a wet dream!

"Christie's great strength is among independent voters, who give him 50.6 degrees of love, and Democrats, who give him 53.2 degrees," Brown said. "His rating on the Thermometer scale is a good indication of what may face him should he travel the 2016 campaign trail. His tougher problem may be winning the GOP nomination because in most states only registered Republicans are able to vote in party primaries," said Brown.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institute...titute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1932
Click to expand...
Why in the world would republicans run a candidate democrats and a slight majority of indies like?
 
Bo-4 said:
Funny, he scores low among Pugs, but high among Indies and Dems. As i've been saying for the last year, he's the only guy with a chance to win yet that seems like the lowest Republican priority in recent years. It's about PRINCIPLES. & PURITY! :)

Which is fine, because running against Goober Cruz, The Idiot Paul Son, Creepy Munster Kid or Snotty Walker would be a wet dream!

"Christie's great strength is among independent voters, who give him 50.6 degrees of love, and Democrats, who give him 53.2 degrees," Brown said. "His rating on the Thermometer scale is a good indication of what may face him should he travel the 2016 campaign trail. His tougher problem may be winning the GOP nomination because in most states only registered Republicans are able to vote in party primaries," said Brown.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institute...titute/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=1932
Click to expand...
Digestion creates a lotta heat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top