New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Clapper Testifies

Zam-Zam said:
Same old same old:

James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Monday that he still has not seen any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals.


Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said on NBC that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. When asked if that is still accurate, Clapper said Monday, "it is."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/j...collusion-with-trump-campaign/article/2622452

So, there's that.......
Click to expand...

As you surely know, Clapper is not privy to the investigation.

So, you have a guy who's not privy to the investigation saying he knows of no evidence of Trump/Russia collusion. That ain't much, but a winger has to grasp whatever solace he can, no?

;-)
 
Zam-Zam said:
Same old same old:

James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Monday that he still has not seen any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals.


Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said on NBC that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. When asked if that is still accurate, Clapper said Monday, "it is."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/j...collusion-with-trump-campaign/article/2622452

So, there's that.......
Click to expand...

An inconvenient truth...
 
Sickofleft said:
Do you have to ask? Clappers testimony, Diane Fisenstein on CNN stating the same thing that she seen no evidence of collusion, all of them destroying the narrative.
Click to expand...

didn't figure I'd get an answer, due to being correct
libs are so torn of Russia and getting nowhere
oh well, democrat party so divided all the Kings Women can't put it back together
especially if against abortion and Planned Parenthood
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ion-rift/ar-BBAWnlb?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartandhp
 
Spamature said:
And you think having told a lie told under oath hanging around her neck would help her with being elected to any office in the future ?

Everyone on Earth knew she her appointment was temporary and that she was not going to keep that position.
Click to expand...

libs voted for liars under oath--Slick

"she her" is that Sow In Pant Suits
 
Dawg said:
is their a reason you're thread jacking? Yates is not the topic!
Click to expand...
Obviously the subject is evidence of collusion by the Trumpies.
Yates was sitting right next to him in the hearing and was asked the exact same question right after he was asked .

Stop trying to stifle discussion in someone else's thread because you don't want contrary opinions from other posters.
 
Dawg said:
libs voted for liars under oath--Slick

"she her" is that Sow In Pant Suits
Click to expand...
Bill and Hillary had nothing to do with the hearing at all, threadjacker. That POS Trump was the subject of the hearing not Hillary. Stop trying to hijack post with your irrelevant bullsh*t.
 
Spamature said:
And you are free to ignore she could not just say no.
Click to expand...
She's a partisan lefty with political aspirations. She won't sink your battleship quite so readily.
You still got nothing on the collusion angle, and you know it.
If you did Rice would have raced to the Hart Building to testify.
 
Zam-Zam said:
I'm not ignoring her lack of testimony; I'm just not going to speculate on what it means. Until she tells us something, we won't know what she has (or hasn't) found.
Click to expand...

But we know she did give the same answer as Clapper. Who was unaware of the FBI counterintelligence investigation.
 
Dino said:
She's a partisan lefty with political aspirations. She won't sink your battleship quite so readily.
You still got nothing on the collusion angle, and you know it.
If you did Rice would have raced to the Hart Building to testify.
Click to expand...

So says you. Rice saw right through GOP'ers and is not going to allow you muddy the waters with partisan talking points.
 
Zam-Zam said:
Same old same old:

James Clapper, the former Director of National Intelligence, told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Monday that he still has not seen any evidence of any kind of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian foreign nationals.


Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-N.C., asked if Clapper's prior statement was correct, when he said on NBC that there was "no evidence' of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials. When asked if that is still accurate, Clapper said Monday, "it is."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/j...collusion-with-trump-campaign/article/2622452

So, there's that.......
Click to expand...
And Diane Feinstein corroborated that opinion on CNN, with Wolf Blitzer. Blitzer did not get the answer he was fishing for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top