New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Climate Disruption Hypocalypse...

Bernard_Fokke

Captain Fokke
Supporting Member
Another of many climate commentary's in the continuing heated discussion and finger pointing contest, frankly I'd be happy if we could agree on one point besides the weather is changing.
Is it warming , cooling, caused by nature or man, what should we do, can we really do anything at all, who can we blame, who should we blame and why?

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/05...nd-the-coming-climate-disruption-hypocalypse/

Funny thing it used to be talking about the weather was a safe subject, now days you're liable to get into a fist fight. LOL
 
Another of many climate commentary's in the continuing heated discussion and finger pointing contest, frankly I'd be happy if we could agree on one point besides the weather is changing.
Is it warming , cooling, caused by nature or man, what should we do, can we really do anything at all, who can we blame, who should we blame and why?

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2014/05...nd-the-coming-climate-disruption-hypocalypse/

Funny thing it used to be talking about the weather was a safe subject, now days you're liable to get into a fist fight. LOL


The first thing we've got to do is obvious. We have no choice. We have to confront the observable effects of climate change.

At the same time, we should pick up the pace in terms of weaning ourselves off dino and transitioning ourselves towards non-greenhouse gas renewables. Some express their "concern" that if we aren't 100% certain about man's role in climate change?.....we'd be making a mistake by taking this tack. I disagree. IF 100 years from now we've transitioned off dino to renewable and we find out that man had no influence over climate change? .....so what? what's the downside?
 
Funny thing it used to be talking about the weather was a safe subject, now days you're liable to get into a fist fight. LOL

Exactly. It used to be that if you wanted to steer people away from talking about religion or politics you'd bring up the weather. Now weather is politics. Now you have to stay away from even the weather because the alarmists have no shame.
 
Exactly. It used to be that if you wanted to steer people away from talking about religion or politics you'd bring up the weather. Now weather is politics. Now you have to stay away from even the weather because the alarmists have no shame.

"Kittens and Puppies" is still safe. Just make sure it isn't just one or the other.
 
The first thing we've got to do is obvious. We have no choice. We have to confront the observable effects of climate change.

At the same time, we should pick up the pace in terms of weaning ourselves off dino and transitioning ourselves towards non-greenhouse gas renewables. Some express their "concern" that if we aren't 100% certain about man's role in climate change?.....we'd be making a mistake by taking this tack. I disagree. IF 100 years from now we've transitioned off dino to renewable and we find out that man had no influence over climate change? .....so what? what's the downside?
Lots of money involved here and the oil companies want to stay in control so you won't see the weaning off the fossil fuels any time soon and the politicians will continue to stay bought
 
Back
Top