Combining Theft & Treason

[Flanders]

Republican crooks stole oil leases:

Events that led to the scandal began decades before when government and U.S. Navy officials, contemplating a new, global presence, realized they needed a fuel supply that was more reliable and more portable than coal.

http://www.wyohistory.org/encyclopedia/teapot-dome-scandal​

Hillary stole uranium:

The latest revelation is a potential bombshell: That while Clinton was secretary of state, a federal committee approved the $610 million sale of Wyoming-based uranium mines to Russia's state atomic energy agency, Rosatom, as it tried to corner the market for the radioactive mineral.

For Hillary Clinton, Scandals Have Achieved Critical Mass
04/23/2015 07:09 PM ET

http://news.investors.com/ibd-edito...n-when-questions-abound-about-her-ethics-.htm​

Has anybody noticed that Democrats are hellbent on eliminating the coal industry and the petroleum industry. Clinton selling America’s uranium to Russia makes it theft and treason. At least President Harding’s cronies were good old-fashioned crooks.

Incidentally, both robberies took place in Wyoming.

 

[Flanders]

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.​

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
By JO BECKER and MIKE McINTIRE APRIL 23, 2015

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0​

I do not know who signed for the other agencies, but you can bet the family fortune that none of the others dare oppose then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton not to mention the president. And I am certain none of them violated the Emoluments Clause as did Hillary:

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution is known as the Emoluments Clause, and it bans payola to U.S. government officials from foreign governments. It reads:

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.​

Sean Davis of The Federalist has explored how payments from foreign governments to the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation probably violate that clause.
​

Hell, everybody knew that Clinton was not innocent before the Blue Dress proved he was guilty.

In fact, the Clintons are never penalized seriously for breaking a law. So it isn’t likely they will be punished when there is no penalty involved:

Clinton Fined $90,686 for Lying in Paula Jones Case
July 30, 1999
|ROBERT L. JACKSON | TIMES STAFF WRITER

http://articles.latimes.com/1999/jul/30/news/mn-61021

An aggressive prosecutor could probably make a case that Hillary benefited from an “emolument” from a foreign government, though it is far from clear what penalty would exist for this constitutional infraction.

April 25, 2015
Hillary and the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution
By Thomas Lifson

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...he_emoluments_clause_of_the_constitution.html​

Forget the Emoluments Clause. Nail them on treason.

Clinton selling America’s uranium to Russia makes it theft and treason.