New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Comments please

That's not what the FBI says. Do you believe the FBI over Alex Jones?

Now that's more loopy than your usual. Everyone knows 30,000+ emails were destroyed. The perp herself claimed they were personal. She also said her lawyers, that presumably she pays, did the work.

And regrettably, of late, myself and millions of others are pressed to believe much of anything coming out of the FBI. Maybe you haven't been paying attention to the incriminating texts coming from the Clinton supporter agent who oversaw the e-mail investigation; changed "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless" in the Hillary exoneration/ excuse speech Comey gave July 5th last year. He also obtained the FISA warrant that gave him the go-ahead to light up Trump Towers with God only knows what new high technological listening equipment?

And then there's the text in which he compared Trump family women to "douchebags"... and you ask me to believe anything the FBI says??
 
Now that's more loopy than your usual. Everyone knows 30,000+ emails were destroyed. The perp herself claimed they were personal. She also said her lawyers, that presumably she pays, did the work.

And regrettably, of late, myself and millions of others are pressed to believe much of anything coming out of the FBI. Maybe you haven't been paying attention to the incriminating texts coming from the Clinton supporter agent who oversaw the e-mail investigation; changed "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless" in the Hillary exoneration/ excuse speech Comey gave July 5th last year. He also obtained the FISA warrant that gave him the go-ahead to light up Trump Towers with God only knows what new high technological listening equipment?

And then there's the text in which he compared Trump family women to "douchebags"... and you ask me to believe anything the FBI says??

Go to Infowars to get the straight skinny.

;-)
 
Full throated suppprt for the proposition that the Kremlin’s interference in our election, and all related Team Trump skulduggery, should have been swept under the rug.

Deplorable.

So like the word that cost Sow the election, use it often and decrease the shameful, dishonest yapping.
 
Well it is a fact that she was subpoenaed and it is a fact that she used bleach bit to destroy the evidence so what conspiracy theory are you refering too?

She turned over all the emails under subpoena. The supposed issue is that some of the emails not under subpoena that were deleted ... because of a miscommunication with the independent contractor hired to preserve her emails when she made clear that all emails under subpoena had to be preserved ... were also supposed to be preserved as per FOIA.
 
But not the ones under subpoena ... and all but a few hundred of them personal ones.

You have got to be kidding!

She turned over all the emails under subpoena​

Out of 60,000 or so emails hidden in her private server how does one subpoena the ones they want.....#1986, # 32,oo2, #993........
 
Last edited:
You gotta wait for Gowdy to stop talking. I know it's tough. He took 7 minutes to ask a "question" that woulda took half that time if he hadn't repeated himself over and over but he was giving a theatrical performance and used all the time he could.

I wouldn't say you're trying to kill the messenger but you have definitely been taken back by the prosecutor's summation. Gowdy was a prosecutor and as you must know good one's are very effective speakers. It's not the fault you want to make it out to be.

Like others you are avoiding comment on what Gowdy presented. But I'll give you credit for not shaming him for his haircut as another of your cohorts did.
 
Last edited:
You have got to be kidding!

She turned over all the emails under subpoena​

Out of 60,000 or so emails hidden in her private server how does one subpoena the ones they want.....#1986, # 32,oo2, #993........

The subpoena was for all emails sent after a certain date. The investigation confirmed that no emails from after that date were deleted.
 
The subpoena was for all emails sent after a certain date. The investigation confirmed that no emails from after that date were deleted.

I'd surely like to see that order given that it has been common knowledge for some time now that it was personal vs government business e-mails....date notwithstanding.-
 
Gowdy always struck me as an unserious investigator -- basically, his questioning is built around creating sound bites for Fox News, to keep his own face on display, rather than built around actually digging into what happened. Finding out what happened is, in fact, the last thing he wants, since that would end his star turn.

But lately it seems his corruption goes deeper than the usual media whoring of career politicians. When one of the Benghazi investigators insisted on continuing to focus on what actually happened, rather than using the investigation as a front for a partisan "Get Hillary" witch-hunt, Gowdy fired the investigator. Then, when the wrongful firing resulted in a wrongful termination lawsuit, Gowdy used $150,000 of OUR money to hush it up. Gowdy should be the target of an ethics investigation, at this point, but since he's a Republican, he'll instead be put in a position to continue his partisan witch-hunting. It's sad how far the GOP has fallen.

Wow, yet another kill the messenger response. Can only be you're just as stunned at what was revealed in those text messages as all the others who avoid the issue.
 
Back
Top