New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Commies !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

america-under-communism.jpg​

First of all, let me apologize for linking yesterday (NY Post) to photos which were widely distributed but not originating from the FBI. I was duped, along with dozens of media outlets. Kudos to the two PJ posters who pointed out that the NY Post is “always wrong”. (full disclosure - this definitely includes the weather. not sure about box scores, horoscopes, and pleas to re-elect the democratic mayor)

That said – I’m reviewing the PJ threads of the past several days, to see who predicted “commies”, as the Boston Terrierists. Um . . . nobody.

Technically, these ARE white males, but it’s looking less and less likely that there’s a tea party or tax protest angle here. These guys apparently never paid taxes. Not sure how they felt about the 1%. For sure they hated the 99%, because the bombs targetted main street, not target Wall Street.

We’re not even sure that the brothers Tsaramazov, caught in a nightmare of Dosteyevski-esque confusion about god, morality, and free will, were actually commies. The latest word is that they were “Russians from a region near Chechnya”. This is sort of like profiling someone as “an American from a region near Tijuana”.

Morning drive time with NPR was fascinating. First up, some pundit whose head was twisted so far to the left that I thought it would fall off. He asserted – without a trace of satire or irony – that this should “still be regarded as an act of domestic terrorism” because the brothers appear to have had relatives who lived in the area for some time, and who sponsored their emigration to this country last year.

Next up, NPR allowed an actual resident from planet earth to speak. He referred by names and dates to several incidents of Chechen inspired terrorism, noting that in each case the perpetrators had funding or ideological guidance from Al Qaeda in Chechnya.

Again, the FBI has been crystal clear about this – they don’t know if these guys were commies, al Qaeda, or even what sort of visa they used to secure residence in this country. Keep up the good work, G-men.

If this lack of context about why there in this US disquiets you, you’re not alone. I imagine some right wing senator will rise in congress this morning, to announce solemnly that the immigration bill is flawed. Well, it might be – nobody has actually deconstructed it yet. But until we know more about how the brothers got here, it’s unfair to say that immigration reform would either make it worse, or tighten things up. What is certain, however, is that the visa status of "Jokar" (phonetic spelling) and his brother won’t advance the cause of liberalized immigration rules.

And now, a word on our FBI guys. I know you’re doing your best. But releasing fuzzy photos more than 48 hours after you had them, with a plea for info, is an admission of intelligence failure. Then, to rush to the cameras this morning to tell us that the brothers were on your “short list”, but THAT YOU HADN’T EVEN INTERVIEWED THEM, AND DIDN’T KNOW WHERE THEY LIVED . . . well, that’s pathetic. It’s self serving.

These guys were caught (well, one at least) because they were idiotic enough to rob a 7-11 for gas money, shoot a campus cop in the head, then engage in a shootout with more local police. The FBI, CIA, Homeland Security? Completely missing in action.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t feel any safer. It turns out the system doesn’t work after all, if two “off the radar” radical tards without even a semblance of an escape could cause 170 casualties.

Further details – or retractions – as they develop

Full disclosure – Chechen Islamic separatists are perhaps most notorious for attempting to kill hundreds of Russian elementary school kids several years ago in a chilling hostage situation.
 
I'm glad I've resisted predictions. I'm still doing so. Even assuming they have the right guys and they're Muslims and Chechans, that still only suggests a motive, it doesn't prove one. It's conceivable it has nothing to do with them being Chechan or Muslim. If a Christian Texan is involved in terrorism, we don't assume it's Christian-extremism related violence, or Texan secessionism, etc. So, we can't assume it's Chechan separatism or Islamism.
 
And now, a word on our FBI guys. I know you’re doing your best. But releasing fuzzy photos more than 48 hours after you had them, with a plea for info, is an admission of intelligence failure. Then, to rush to the cameras this morning to tell us that the brothers were on your “short list”, but THAT YOU HADN’T EVEN INTERVIEWED THEM, AND DIDN’T KNOW WHERE THEY LIVED . . . well, that’s pathetic. It’s self serving.

No worse than the 'mission accomplished' photo-op with Bush.. Even worse -- he invaded the wrong country.. USA is still paying that price for that outrageous behavior.. So please spare the criticism..
 
I'm glad I've resisted predictions. I'm still doing so. Even assuming they have the right guys and they're Muslims and Chechans, that still only suggests a motive, it doesn't prove one. It's conceivable it has nothing to do with them being Chechan or Muslim. If a Christian Texan is involved in terrorism, we don't assume it's Christian-extremism related violence, or Texan secessionism, etc. So, we can't assume it's Chechan separatism or Islamism.

ark - thanks for your reply. i dont see what the motive could be, if it has nothing to do with radical islam or chechnya, however.

as the NPR news lady challenged one of her experts this morning - "please identify an incidence of terrorism by a chechen national which WASNT inspired or funded by radical islam"

cut to the sound of crickets chirping, on NPR
 
If this bombing is the work of the former CIA asset 'al-Quada', will this effect Obama funding/arming the Syrian/Al-quada/NATO rebel alliance against secular president Assad??
 
ark - thanks for your reply. i dont see what the motive could be, if it has nothing to do with radical islam or chechnya, however.

as the NPR news lady challenged one of her experts this morning - "please identify an incidence of terrorism by a chechen national which WASNT inspired or funded by radical islam"

cut to the sound of crickets chirping, on NPR

Time will tell. No need to hurry to theories. If I had to guess, I'd guess they were Chechan separatists. But in theory they could be Unabomber types with very specific personal bones to pick.
 
Well, one good thing might come out of this: perhaps you have learned not to trust the reporting of The New York Post.

But I doubt it.
 
Here's the thing: Terrorism is terrorism and a terrorist is a terrorist.

I don't really care what color their skin is or what motivated their terrorism. The end result is the same.
 
Well, one good thing might come out of this: perhaps you have learned not to trust the reporting of The New York Post.

But I doubt it.

Agree with you, Leroy..

World English Dictionary

alarmist (əˈlɑːmɪst)

— n
1. a person who alarms or attempts to alarm others needlessly or without due grounds
2. a person who is easily alarmed

a·larm·ist
[uh-lahr-mist] Show IPA
noun
1.
a person who tends to raise alarms, especially without sufficient reason, as by exaggerating dangers or prophesying calamities.
 
To return one requires winning one, doesn't it?

night - i love the pulitzers. i agree its a shame the post didn't win one this year. which 2013 winner was your favorite?

- the NY Times expose on Apple sweatshops in china, where expensive iPhones are churned out by people making 37 cents an hour and no benefits?

- the minneapolis star tribune story on how regulatory agency failures and mismanagement led to a spike in infant deaths at day care centers?

- the wall street journal award for editorial discussion of flaws in the hillary/obama foreign policy outreaches?

- the awards to a half dozen (approx) associated press photographers, who risked their lives to document how Syria's assad is slaughtering civilians
 
Back
Top