justoffal
Senator
For some time now I have predicted that the SCOTUS would side step the decision making process behind the National Healthcare issue and till this morning I thought that my viewpoint had been vindicated...it appeared that they simply passed it along to the voters in November.
But wait...an important change has indeed been made to the issue at large. The ruling did not prohibit the Federal Government from the coercion segment of this law insofar as it appears to be within the Government's powers of Taxation to determine the cost of a national policy and then seek to fund that policy....this pretty much closes down the commerce clause argument from the public opinion Standpoint which would have been an obvious overstep of Government Authority.
By prodding this thing along into the light of NEW TAXATION.....Roberts may have subtly dressed this thing up as dog food for the hungry wolves of November. After all, why should the SCOTUS stand in front of the firing squad of left wing OPINE and HATRED when a defeat at the poles in November will do the same thing anyway?
It's a thought.
JO
But wait...an important change has indeed been made to the issue at large. The ruling did not prohibit the Federal Government from the coercion segment of this law insofar as it appears to be within the Government's powers of Taxation to determine the cost of a national policy and then seek to fund that policy....this pretty much closes down the commerce clause argument from the public opinion Standpoint which would have been an obvious overstep of Government Authority.
By prodding this thing along into the light of NEW TAXATION.....Roberts may have subtly dressed this thing up as dog food for the hungry wolves of November. After all, why should the SCOTUS stand in front of the firing squad of left wing OPINE and HATRED when a defeat at the poles in November will do the same thing anyway?
It's a thought.
JO
