Constitutional Sheepdog
][][][%er!!!!!!!
After she attacked a Trump supporter
After she attacked a Trump supporter
I AGREEThese wackos should be on a watchlist.
That was lame. She is lame.After she attacked a Trump supporter
It's a leftist agenda that's what I think about it.That was lame. She is lame.
Let me know what you think of this though.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-in-the-machine/201712/analysis-trump-supporters-has-identified-5-key-traits?amp
SHE or is it a shimLooses job? So he has it, but it’s coming apart?
You didn't actually read it did you?It's a leftist agenda that's what I think about it.
leftist are the wacko's mentally sick rabid animals.
I Saw the link that's all it tookYou didn't actually read it did you?
You are kind of weak aren't you?I Saw the link that's all it took
Leftist actions show what they are
I'm not wasting my time on leftist lies I'm calling it how it is.You are kind of weak aren't you?
You seem terrified of reading anything that doesn't conform to your ore concieved notions.
I hope you gain some intelectual courage.
Too intellectually weak to risk it.I'm not wasting my time on leftist lies I'm calling it how it is.
Cut the bullshit I know the leftist agenda and I know the actions of the left when you attack others then spin it to make it look like it's the oppositions fault so go fvck yourselfToo intellectually weak to risk it.
Sad.
I"m glad she lost her job.After she attacked a Trump supporter
Not a government list; I ain't a fan of government keeping "lists". Bad things come from that.These wackos should be on a watchlist.
But you didn't even read it. The only explanation is intellectual cowardice.Cut the bullshit I know the leftist agenda and I know the actions of the left when you attack others then spin it to make it look like it's the oppositions fault so go fvck yourself
Maybe he was just considering the source. Since it came from you, odds are, it's just nonsense.But you didn't even read it. The only explanation is intellectual cowardice.
The source was Psychology Today.Maybe he was just considering the source. Since it came from you, odds are, it's just nonsense.
No it wasn't. It was originally published by Raw Story. Psychology Today simply re-printed it, probably as filler.The source was Psychology Today.
Considering the source is fine but being too afraid to read anything that might challenge your preconcieved notions is intellectual cowardice.