New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Cumulative Effect

Zam-Zam

Senator
The following are some of the headlines currently over at "Real Clear Politics"


The Problems Pile Up for Obama

In IRS Scandal, Echoes of Watergate

Our Ceaseless Circus

Lies About Libya

Obama More Outraged at GOP Than IRS

Obama's Second-Term Blues Set In

Obama Knee-Deep in Nixon-esque Scandal

Confusion, Cover-Up & the Lingering Questions

4 Americans--& the Truth--Died in Benghazi




What the effect of all of this will be on the administration is too early to decipher. Some will be convinced it will be his Waterloo, others that it won't touch him at all. I think that may be wishful thinking in both instances, and that real outcome lies somewhere in the middle ground. Interesting few days ahead, until the press gets bored and moves on once again.
 
Redundancy does not a pile make. Nice mole hill. Good luck with your desperation, FOX man.
 
Should the press become bored (as they should), then the House Republicans will simply start another "investigation". Investigations are easy -- especially those that never result in a finding of guilt.

So then... Enjoy your "investigations". As a Republican, that's really all you've got going for you these days.
 
Redundancy does not a pile make. Nice mole hill. Good luck with your desperation, FOX man.

"Fox man"?

I very seldom watch any television at all. However, for someone who is interested in putting labels on others, I'm fairly certain that won't matter to you in the least. Intelligent rational dialog is not your thing, as they say, better to disparage another poster and move on. It's what you do.
 
Should the press become bored (as they should), then the House Republicans will simply start another "investigation". Investigations are easy -- especially those that never result in a finding of guilt.

So then... Enjoy your "investigations". As a Republican, that's really all you've got going for you these days.



The press is already getting bored, some have moved on to Angelina Jolie's mastectomy. And whether you know it or not, I've got quite a lot going on for me these days, politics is only a tiny portion of my life. It's all good.
 
The press is already getting bored, some have moved on to Angelina Jolie's mastectomy. And whether you know it or not, I've got quite a lot going on for me these days, politics is only a tiny portion of my life. It's all good.


Politics is the topic of your post, but I understand why you aren't happy with politics recently. Sliming the opposition has been a time-honored tactic of the Republican Party since Richard Nixon's reign. What will the GOP do now that this tactic isn't working any longer?

They could run on a policy agenda -- if they had one.
 
You claim to have such a "pile" of "scandals" that it will have a "cumulative effect" and then post that redundant list of gibberish? How many "issues" do you see there? You even include "The problems pile up for Obama" as one of his problems....along with "the ceaseless circus", "Obama More Outraged at GOP Than IRS" and "Obama's Second-Term Blues Set In". Hilarious.

Then you list Benghazi three times as if they were separate topics and try to call him Nixon twice for the IRS's behavior.

Y'all ever have anything real? (Rhetorical) Only you, Rush and FOX are fantasizing a "cumulative effect". With them, it's a goal. You're just a dupe.
 
Intelligent rational dialog is not your thing

Actually, it is. Your stupid list doesn't qualify. You're parroting what O'Reilly just said on GMA 30 minutes ago....precisely the same time you posted. Quite a coincidence, eh?
 
Intelligent rational dialog is not your thing

Actually, it is. Your stupid list doesn't qualify. You're parroting what O'Reilly just said on GMA 30 minutes ago....precisely the same time you posted. Quite a coincidence, eh?




There are three separate scandals going on here at the same time. Some would say that is a lot. And if someone else on some television program said the same thing, I guess that proves I'm not the only one who thinks so.
 
Politics is the topic of your post, but I understand why you aren't happy with politics recently. Sliming the opposition has been a time-honored tactic of the Republican Party since Richard Nixon's reign. What will the GOP do now that this tactic isn't working any longer?

They could run on a policy agenda -- if they had one.



I'm pretty happy in general. Whether you think so or not doesn't matter (at least not to me), because that's your thing, not mine. I haven't 'slimed' anyone, I presented facts. What you think of those facts is your business, but they will remain facts.
 
You claim to have such a "pile" of "scandals" that it will have a "cumulative effect" and then post that redundant list of gibberish? How many "issues" do you see there? You even include "The problems pile up for Obama" as one of his problems....along with "the ceaseless circus", "Obama More Outraged at GOP Than IRS" and "Obama's Second-Term Blues Set In". Hilarious.

Then you list Benghazi three times as if they were separate topics and try to call him Nixon twice for the IRS's behavior.

Y'all ever have anything real? (Rhetorical) Only you, Rush and FOX are fantasizing a "cumulative effect". With them, it's a goal. You're just a dupe.



You're reduced to name-calling?

I guess that means I've won. I accept your surrender.
 
Yes I agree..

With what? That Benghazi will never subside and that Obama is Nixon and that y'all can sustain that forever?

Good luck with that.
 
Anything that hurts Obama and the Democrats is good for America.

The following are some of the headlines currently over at "Real Clear Politics"


The Problems Pile Up for Obama

In IRS Scandal, Echoes of Watergate

Our Ceaseless Circus

Lies About Libya

Obama More Outraged at GOP Than IRS

Obama's Second-Term Blues Set In

Obama Knee-Deep in Nixon-esque Scandal

Confusion, Cover-Up & the Lingering Questions

4 Americans--& the Truth--Died in Benghazi




What the effect of all of this will be on the administration is too early to decipher. Some will be convinced it will be his Waterloo, others that it won't touch him at all. I think that may be wishful thinking in both instances, and that real outcome lies somewhere in the middle ground. Interesting few days ahead, until the press gets bored and moves on once again.
 
Should the press become bored (as they should), then the House Republicans will simply start another "investigation". Investigations are easy -- especially those that never result in a finding of guilt.

So then... Enjoy your "investigations". As a Republican, that's really all you've got going for you these days.

The Republican House will be doing nothing BUT 'investigating' for the next three-and-a-half years. Right up to the 2016 Presidential election. I am, of course, assuming here that the House remains in Republican hands after the 2014 elections. But who knows, the public may get weary of a Congress that does NOTHING for the American people, but investigating.
 
No my point is that the dedicated voters will not move.....the only ones to be converted are the independent voters.....and that drawing BehGhazi out is an Axelrod tactic that will absolutely work like magic.

Truth.........well truth is irrelevant.

JO
 
i think real clear politics is about as irrelevant as huff po, as far as informing america goes.

typically, if a politician "goes down" its about 1 big problem, rather than a bunch of little ones. nobody actually dies by being nibbled to death by goldfish.

for dubya, it was the iraq war; for carter, it was the misery index; for nixon, it was watergate; for LBJ it was the vietnam war;
 
and that drawing BehGhazi out is an Axelrod tactic

Axelrod runs FOX now?
 
Back
Top