Democrat DC mayor: Christians, Jews, and Muslims aren't entitled to first amendment protections

[marvin martian]

She's a good Democrat.

D.C. Mayor Bowser on Accusation of Treating Protests and Churches Differently: First Amendment Protects Protests

During an interview on MSNBC on Wednesday, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) responded to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) | Clips

www.breitbart.com

During an interview on MSNBC on Wednesday, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) responded to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) accusation that she is treating protests differently from religious services by stating that D.C. is following a phased reopening, and “First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same.”

After listening to a clip from McConnell where he said, “Here in the District of Columbia, the mayor celebrates massive street protests. She actually joins them herself. But on her command, churches and houses of worship remain shut. … Apparently, while protests are now permissible, prayer is still too dangerous.”

Bowser responded, “I think the senator is very familiar with the White House’s reopening plan. It’s a phased reopening plan. It follows data and science. The president was there when it was presented by Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci. And we are following a phased reopening plan in Washington, D.C., and we are in phase one. We’re reopening our city safely and according to the science. Now, First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same. And that’s why we don’t see our cities opened up to all of the massive events. Now, in the United States of America, people can protest.”

 

[Emily]

Now, in the United States of America, people can protest.”

Well, ain't it good to know that one of our unalienable constitutional rights still exists.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

She's a good Democrat.

D.C. Mayor Bowser on Accusation of Treating Protests and Churches Differently: First Amendment Protects Protests

During an interview on MSNBC on Wednesday, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) responded to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) | Clips

www.breitbart.com

During an interview on MSNBC on Wednesday, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) responded to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) accusation that she is treating protests differently from religious services by stating that D.C. is following a phased reopening, and “First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same.”

After listening to a clip from McConnell where he said, “Here in the District of Columbia, the mayor celebrates massive street protests. She actually joins them herself. But on her command, churches and houses of worship remain shut. … Apparently, while protests are now permissible, prayer is still too dangerous.”

Bowser responded, “I think the senator is very familiar with the White House’s reopening plan. It’s a phased reopening plan. It follows data and science. The president was there when it was presented by Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci. And we are following a phased reopening plan in Washington, D.C., and we are in phase one. We’re reopening our city safely and according to the science. Now, First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same. And that’s why we don’t see our cities opened up to all of the massive events. Now, in the United States of America, people can protest.”

I think the Corona Virus which really hit Blue States hard- created an exacerbation of leftists deep deep deep mental illness.

 

[UPNYA2]

She's a good Democrat.

D.C. Mayor Bowser on Accusation of Treating Protests and Churches Differently: First Amendment Protects Protests

During an interview on MSNBC on Wednesday, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) responded to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-KY) | Clips

www.breitbart.com

During an interview on MSNBC on Wednesday, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) responded to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (R-KY) accusation that she is treating protests differently from religious services by stating that D.C. is following a phased reopening, and “First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same.”

After listening to a clip from McConnell where he said, “Here in the District of Columbia, the mayor celebrates massive street protests. She actually joins them herself. But on her command, churches and houses of worship remain shut. … Apparently, while protests are now permissible, prayer is still too dangerous.”

Bowser responded, “I think the senator is very familiar with the White House’s reopening plan. It’s a phased reopening plan. It follows data and science. The president was there when it was presented by Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci. And we are following a phased reopening plan in Washington, D.C., and we are in phase one. We’re reopening our city safely and according to the science. Now, First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same. And that’s why we don’t see our cities opened up to all of the massive events. Now, in the United States of America, people can protest.”

"Now, First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same. And that’s why we don’t see our cities opened up to all of the massive events. Now, in the United States of America, people can protest.”

HUH???

"protests and large gatherings are not the same."
How is that? Are these protest limited in size? Only allowed with 10 or less people there? Everyone of those have to maintain 6 feet of distance from one another?
Oh HELL no. As she says, they aren't churches or something.

The first amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Protests and the free exercise of religion are quite literally spoken of in the same damned sentance, so how can she think people have a right to one but not the other?

Damned liberal education system......

Damned liberal period.

 

[Nutty Cortez]

"Now, First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same. And that’s why we don’t see our cities opened up to all of the massive events. Now, in the United States of America, people can protest.”

HUH???

"protests and large gatherings are not the same."
How is that? Are these protest limited in size? Only allowed with 10 or less people there? Everyone of those have to maintain 6 feet of distance from one another?
Oh HELL no. As she says, they aren't churches or something.

The first amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Protests and the free exercise of religion are quite literally spoken of in the same damned sentance, so how can she think people have a right to one but not the other?

Damned liberal education system......

Damned liberal period.

Leftists : "You can't go to church- you will be arrested!"

Same leftists 2 weeks later : "Oh you burned down a church ok"

 

[UPNYA2]

Leftists : "You can't go to church- you will be arrested!"

Same leftists 2 weeks later : "Oh you burned down a church ok"

That's right. I almost forgot...…….

To dems/libs churches are made to burn if you are angry.

OH...….. Just not black churches in the south. That sh it isn't acceptable at all.

 

[marvin martian]

"Now, First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same. And that’s why we don’t see our cities opened up to all of the massive events. Now, in the United States of America, people can protest.”

HUH???

"protests and large gatherings are not the same."
How is that? Are these protest limited in size? Only allowed with 10 or less people there? Everyone of those have to maintain 6 feet of distance from one another?
Oh HELL no. As she says, they aren't churches or something.

The first amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Protests and the free exercise of religion are quite literally spoken of in the same damned sentance, so how can she think people have a right to one but not the other?

Damned liberal education system......

Damned liberal period.

Yeah, I was hoping to get a leftnut here to explain this "logic", but they tend to be far too frightened to engage my threads.

 

[EatTheRich]

"Now, First Amendment protests and large gatherings are not the same. And that’s why we don’t see our cities opened up to all of the massive events. Now, in the United States of America, people can protest.”

HUH???

"protests and large gatherings are not the same."
How is that? Are these protest limited in size? Only allowed with 10 or less people there? Everyone of those have to maintain 6 feet of distance from one another?
Oh HELL no. As she says, they aren't churches or something.

The first amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Protests and the free exercise of religion are quite literally spoken of in the same damned sentance, so how can she think people have a right to one but not the other?

Damned liberal education system......

Damned liberal period.

You can have free exercise of religion without congregating in one place. You can’t have peaceable assembly without congregating in one place.