New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Democrats’ worst nightmare (GOP too) – Ben Carson running for Prez

000 carson.jpg


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/1/ben-carson-takes-major-step-toward-presidential-ca/

Ben Carson has formed a “political action committee” as a first step towards declaring his candidacy for president in 2016.

Color me skeptical.

I do applaud the idea of black Americans hearing the message of hard work, educational achievement, and sobriety from a high achieving black leader. This is likely to scare democrats – and for good reason. Nobody in their right mind wants to continue with the democratic party/teachers union status quo – sky high wages and benefits; unbreakable tenure; and a 50% inner city “defect rate” – that is, 50% of inner city high school students fail to get a degree. Make that 60% if we’re talking about DC, where federal subsidies have resulted in the cost of “educating” a student rising to the same level as a year at Harvard.

Ben Carson – please address this. And please tell people not to use marijuana, whether they’re “sick” or not, or whether it’s legal or not. I’ve never read about anyone improving their intelligence, making an important scientific discovery – or even being allowed to drive a bus – while on narcotics. As a physician, this is your area of expertise. Narcotics are not well understood by pandering politicians who would legalize rape and prostitution if they believed it was key to their re-election.

But Ben, I’m skeptical about the presidential bid. When was the last time someone with ZERO political experience got elected to the white house? Well, it was more recently than some here would guess. That would be Dwight D. Eisenhower. Former commander in chief of the army that crushed Hitler. And although I general endorse Eisenhower’s belief “that which governs least governs best” , he DID bring us Richard Nixon as his veep; failure to act on america's apartheid system; and political/cia intrigue in half a dozen countries which had signficiant blowback. Well, nobody’s perfect.

Not even you, Ben Carson. There’s more to being president than inspiring speeches, as Obama found out to his everlasting chagrin. You need to assemble a white house team which can sort good ideas from bad, fend off the crazies in your own party, and has an instinctive feel for what the american people will accept. The Obama white house is zero for three on this – a negative hat trick. Which is why his popularity is now lower than anyone named bush, carter, Roosevelt, or Hoover. He might be above Nixon – someone here on PJ will know.

Ben, you’re the alpha black-male Sarah Palin – with a higher IQ. But that won’t keep the extreme left press from dogging you 24-7 with insults, fake scandals, and an “exclusive” on every white woman you shook hands with. Do you want to go through that, and put your family through it? Do you want to get ambushed with questions like "who is the prime minister of Ukraine this week?" or "Explain the difference between Hamas, Hezbollah, and Hummus"?

The presidency is a job for professionals. The operating theater is as well. I’m not sure either set of skills translates into success in the other. If we’ve learned anything from Obamacare, it’s this: politicians don’t know jack about medicine. And probably vice versa.
 
Zero political experience.
And that is a liability.
Isn't it strange that we hate the thought of a political insider because to be on, a person has to be tainted by whatever slimy oil coats everyone in the Beltway and they act .... based on all the wrong things. Politics ruins good people.
Yet,
if we don't get someone that is experienced, it's even worse. Look at Barack Obama. He was too inexperienced for the job and due to that he has been a terrible President.

Maybe zero political experience is better than a lot, or just a little...................but do we dare try it out? I'm not convinced that we do.
 
Zero political experience.
And that is a liability.
Isn't it strange that we hate the thought of a political insider because to be on, a person has to be tainted by whatever slimy oil coats everyone in the Beltway and they act .... based on all the wrong things. Politics ruins good people.
Yet,
if we don't get someone that is experienced, it's even worse. Look at Barack Obama. He was too inexperienced for the job and due to that he has been a terrible President.

Maybe zero political experience is better than a lot, or just a little...................but do we dare try it out? I'm not convinced that we do.

i dont begrudge someone with zero political experience running for elective office. maybe start out with something less ambitious: governor, senator, big city mayor?

i'd be more comfortable with condi rice, and her experience working for bush, than I am with carson.

if carson wants to show us he can assemble a first rate team - proposed secretary of state, secretary of the treasury, secretary of defense, etc . . . i'd certainly be interested. not so much if the guy at the top has never held office and his team consists of "players to be named later"
 
i dont begrudge someone with zero political experience running for elective office. maybe start out with something less ambitious: governor, senator, big city mayor?

i'd be more comfortable with condi rice, and her experience working for bush, than I am with carson.

if carson wants to show us he can assemble a first rate team - proposed secretary of state, secretary of the treasury, secretary of defense, etc . . . i'd certainly be interested. not so much if the guy at the top has never held office and his team consists of "players to be named later"

YES. Carson would need to talk to us about his proposed cabinet. Those people a President surrounds himself with are very important and with him being inexperienced we would need to know who they are before hand .......or be given some idea of who they might be if they accepted.

I would be comfortable with Condi Rice, but she has plenty of fodder for the Left (even if it's mostly lies) (the left is comfortable with lying)....... I'm sure she would be shredded and she doesn't deserve that.

All of that said, I do hope that if (when) a Republican is elected that if it's not Carson that he is on the Cabinet in some capacity. His wisdom should be tapped.
 
YES. Carson would need to talk to us about his proposed cabinet. Those people a President surrounds himself with are very important and with him being inexperienced we would need to know who they are before hand .......or be given some idea of who they might be if they accepted.

I would be comfortable with Condi Rice, but she has plenty of fodder for the Left (even if it's mostly lies) (the left is comfortable with lying)....... I'm sure she would be shredded and she doesn't deserve that.

All of that said, I do hope that if (when) a Republican is elected that if it's not Carson that he is on the Cabinet in some capacity. His wisdom should be tapped.

i think this was a plus for obama, actually. i believe he announced Hillary's role in his administration at the same time he made Biden his running mate. Cynics will claim this is simply a crass attempt to placate disgruntled Hillary backers - but naming a rival to your candidate always has an element of this.
 
i dont begrudge someone with zero political experience running for elective office.

I kind of like the idea. A president is an Administrator according to FDR. Congress and the Judiciary do all the work. As the Administrator you put the best and most qualified people that know more than you do in the appropriate position, not big donors.

Henry Ford was successful because he surrounded himself with people who were smarter than him in many ways. He didn't have to know everything. The fact is Ford was tremendously successful precisely because he knew he didn't know everything, let alone think he knew everything.

Besides that anybody with "political experience" gained in the last 35 years is poisoned to begin with. Tarnished with a bias no matter how slight and beholden to those that got him there.

But on the other hand if you mean by "political experience" the art of negotiating, which is vitally important, than a Donald Trump would qualify, as would have Mitt Romney, or many other successful leaders of either party.

Ideologues have no business being installed in the White House, particularly if they're not eligible for it and refuse to prove they are. It's simply not their job to define what this country should become and do it outside of the process.

All that said, if Carson runs he'll be trashed. Particularly by those who have for decades touted themselves as color blind and champions of diversity when in fact they are slaveholders. And any of color that opt out of that are to be hunted down, drug home through the dirt, and lynched in public as a warning to other free thinkers
 
Last edited:
I kind of like the idea. A president is an Administrator according to FDR. Congress and the Judiciary do all the work. As the Administrator you put the best and most qualified people that no more than you do in the appropriate position, not big donors.

Henry Ford was successful because he surrounded himself with people who were smarter than him in many ways. He didn't have to know everything. The fact is Ford was tremendously successful precisely because he knew he didn't know everything, let alone think he knew everything.

Besides that anybody with "political experience" gained in the last 35 years is poisoned to begin with. Tarnished with a bias no matter how slight and beholden to those that got him there.

But on the other hand if you mean by "political experience" the art of negotiating than a Donald Trump would qualify, as would have Mitt Romney, or many other successful leaders.

Foamy-mouth-cowboy dude has a really SICK version of "leaders".

Whatevs
 
Back
Top